신채호 아나키즘의 문학적 형상화- 하늘(天)과 용(龍) 이미지의 전도(顚倒)
Literary Image for Sin Chae-ho's Anarchism -Upsetting the image of Korean traditional god and the Dragon
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
On the one hand Sin Chae-ho agreed with Kropotkin's mutualism, but on the other hand accepted assassination from Russian nihilists' idea as Anarchism. He accepted assassination as anti-imperialism and developed it into a theory of People's Revolution. We can see the theory of People's Revolution in the 'the Declaration of Independence of Joseon'(1923), which had a trait of a struggle of classes as a direct violence revolution of people. He expressed the People's Revolution literarily in the novel of 'Miri vs Dragon'(1928). If we read the book in detail, we can find that he tried to break the traditional values, upsetting the image of the god of Korea and the dragon. The god of Korea in the text stood for not only monarchy and Japanese imperialism but also authoritative ideas and religions. He degraded and caricatured Sangje who represented Korean traditional god. In his writing Sangje degenerated into a mouse and Jesus was murdered by the popular revolution. As a kind of literary metaphor, it showed aesthetics which contained humor and ridicule for authoritative ideas and religions, and his opinion of the popular revolution. Also, he classified the Yong into the Miri and the Dragon to express the traditional image. The Miri had meant a king but the author made it an image of a monster that squeezed the people. And champion of revolution as he was, the Dragon existed by the sound of, "He has come, he has come, the Dragon has come!" in the text, but he actually did not exist. The Dragon was expressed as '0'. The absence of the Dragon showed the author's opinion that the self- awakening of nation should be needed before the popular revolution. It is a kind of literary metaphor. Even though Kotoku Shusui who had influenced Sin Chae-ho's Anarchism wrote a book about a dragon, his expression of a dragon was not better than Sin Chae-ho's.
Abstract
On the one hand Sin Chae-ho agreed with Kropotkin's mutualism, but on the other hand accepted assassination from Russian nihilists' idea as Anarchism. He accepted assassination as anti-imperialism and developed it into a theory of People's Revolution. We can see the theory of People's Revolution in the 'the Declaration of Independence of Joseon'(1923), which had a trait of a struggle of classes as a direct violence revolution of people. He expressed the People's Revolution literarily in the novel of 'Miri vs Dragon'(1928). If we read the book in detail, we can find that he tried to break the traditional values, upsetting the image of the god of Korea and the dragon. The god of Korea in the text stood for not only monarchy and Japanese imperialism but also authoritative ideas and religions. He degraded and caricatured Sangje who represented Korean traditional god. In his writing Sangje degenerated into a mouse and Jesus was murdered by the popular revolution. As a kind of literary metaphor, it showed aesthetics which contained humor and ridicule for authoritative ideas and religions, and his opinion of the popular revolution. Also, he classified the Yong into the Miri and the Dragon to express the traditional image. The Miri had meant a king but the author made it an image of a monster that squeezed the people. And champion of revolution as he was, the Dragon existed by the sound of, "He has come, he has come, the Dragon has come!" in the text, but he actually did not exist. The Dragon was expressed as '0'. The absence of the Dragon showed the author's opinion that the self- awakening of nation should be needed before the popular revolution. It is a kind of literary metaphor. Even though Kotoku Shusui who had influenced Sin Chae-ho's Anarchism wrote a book about a dragon, his expression of a dragon was not better than Sin Chae-ho's.
참고문헌 (26)
- 고토쿠 슈스이, "幸德秋水全集" (1980), 메이지문고
- 신채호, "단재 신채호전집" (1985), 형설출판사
- 신채호, "단재 신채호전집" (1995), 형설출판사
- 신채호, "용와 용의 대격전, 신채호문학연구" (1989), 아침
- 권택영, "카니발의 의미, 바흐친과 대화주의", pp.269~277 (1990), 나남
- 近藤典彦, "<呼子と口笛>の口?と『基督抹殺論』─秋水の遺著に重ねた啄木の天皇制批判─", 成城文芸, 133, pp.33~ (1990)
- 김갑수, "아나키즘의 윤리관과 전통 윤리관의 만남 및 변용", 시대와 철학, 18(1), pp.65~110 (2007), 한국철학사상연구회
- 柳田泉, "明治に於ける社?主義文?の勃興と展開", 明治大正文究, 15, pp.25~26 (1955)
- 민 찬, "단재 소설의 경로와 전통의 자장(磁場)", 인문과학 논문집, (34), pp.161~ (2002), 대전대 인문과학 연구소
- 민찬, "단재 소설 <용과 용의 대격전>의 내용 및 형식", 어문연구, (48), pp.351~377 (2005), 어문연구학회
- 박준건, "해방전 일본을 통한 서양사회사상의 수용과정에 관한 연구", 한국민족문화, 16(1), pp.351~362 (2000), 부산대 한국민족문화연구소
- 신지영, "신채호의 담론 구성과 글쓰기의 역동성", 원우론집, (36), pp.135~137 (2002), 연세대 대학원 원우회
- 윤일, "근대 일본과 한국의 사회진화론과 아나키즘 연구 - 고토쿠 슈스이와 신채호를 중심으로 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(14), pp.67~100 (2008), 동북아시아문화학회
- 윤 일, "明治三十年代に見られるイエス像─木下?江と幸?秋水の場合 ─", COMPARATIO, 4, pp.115~117 (2000)
- 이동재, "단재 신채호 소설의 문학사적 계보와 변천과정 연구", 현대문학이론연구, (20), pp.10~274 (2003), 현대문학이론학회
- 李浩龍, "신채호의 아나키즘", 역사학보, 177, pp.67~103 (2003), 역사학회
- 조세현, "동아시아 3국(한중일)에서크로포트킨 사상의 수용 - 相互扶助論을 중심으로 -", 중국사연구, (39), pp.231~273 (2005), 중국사학회
- 한금윤, "신채호 소설의 미적특성 연구-<꿈하늘>과 <용과 용의 대격전>을 중심으로", 현대소설연구, 9, pp.146~147 (1998)
- 한국의 내셔널리즘과 소국의식, "조선", pp.2007, 기무라 간
- 김병민, "신채호문학연구", pp.226~ (1989), 아침
- 김욱동, "대화적 상상력", pp.243~246 (1994), 문학과 지성사
- 이호룡, "한국의 아나키즘-사상편", pp.92~93 (2002), 지식산업사
- 전복희, "사회진화론과 국가사상-구한말을 중심으로" (1996), 한울 아카데미
- 조세현, "동아시아 아나키즘, 그 반역의 역사", pp.25~26 (2001), 책세상
- 최기영, "식민지 시기 민족지성과 문화운동" (2003), 한울아카데미
- 헨리 H. 할레이, "최신 성서 핸드북", pp.840~841 (2006), 기독교문사
