본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

동아시아 반식민주의 저항으로서 일제말의 ‘만주 서사’ - 이태준의 <농군>과 한설야의 <대륙>을 중심으로-

'Manchuria Narration' in the Late of Japanese Imperialism as Anti-colonial Resistance of East Asia - in the <Nonggun(농군)> by Lee Taejun and <Daeruk(대륙)> by Han Seolya

0

조회

0

다운로드

18

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

Japanese imperialism on Manchuria state intended to make Manchuria colony of Japanese empire standing colonialism argument such as national harmony(民族協和), seonmanilye(鮮滿一如), and naeseonilche(內鮮一體). In this process, Japanese imperialism reinforced colonialism control through discriminative treatment toward Chosun people living in Manchuria. A short story <Nonggun(농군)> by Lee Taejun and a novel <Daeruk(대륙)> by Han Seolya were problem novels staring at this reality of Manchuria and seeking for narrative possibility of anti-colonial resistance. A narrative strategy to pay attention to <Nonggun(농군)> should consider <Leeminburakgynmungi(이민부락견문기)> that was written earlier than <Nonggun(농군)>. Like reassignment 'Manbosan Event(만보산 사건)' in <Nonggun(농군)>, <Nonggun(농군)> intended to read contradiction and break of colonial narration with national harmony(民族協和), seonmanilye(鮮滿一如), and naeseonilche(內鮮一體) of Manchuria through anti-colonial resistant context in Jangjaweofu(쟝자워푸) of Manchuria state. That is to seek for new possibility of anti-colonial resistant narration that could implode colonialism. While Manchuria state destroyed a basic mind of national harmony(民族協和). Han Seolya's <Daeruk(대륙)> had an insight to colonial desire of a private citizen capitalist who devoted to colonial management of an empire in Manchuria state. As Han Seloya did not deny completely a frame of Manchuria state that had close relation to Japanese empire, he had a dream for an accompanied world, national harmony(民族協和), capital paradise that could not be caught by colonialism of Japanese empire through love transcending race and nationality. Like intending to narrative strategy of Lee Taejun, Han Seolya also tried to a new possibility of anti-colonial resistant narration by striking back naturally a sight of an empire. Manchuria could be a strategic position to Lee Taejun and Han Seolya to newly seek for anti-colonial resistant narration with a possibility to implode colonialism through narrative realization that was different from in Chosun.

Abstract

Japanese imperialism on Manchuria state intended to make Manchuria colony of Japanese empire standing colonialism argument such as national harmony(民族協和), seonmanilye(鮮滿一如), and naeseonilche(內鮮一體). In this process, Japanese imperialism reinforced colonialism control through discriminative treatment toward Chosun people living in Manchuria. A short story <Nonggun(농군)> by Lee Taejun and a novel <Daeruk(대륙)> by Han Seolya were problem novels staring at this reality of Manchuria and seeking for narrative possibility of anti-colonial resistance. A narrative strategy to pay attention to <Nonggun(농군)> should consider <Leeminburakgynmungi(이민부락견문기)> that was written earlier than <Nonggun(농군)>. Like reassignment 'Manbosan Event(만보산 사건)' in <Nonggun(농군)>, <Nonggun(농군)> intended to read contradiction and break of colonial narration with national harmony(民族協和), seonmanilye(鮮滿一如), and naeseonilche(內鮮一體) of Manchuria through anti-colonial resistant context in Jangjaweofu(쟝자워푸) of Manchuria state. That is to seek for new possibility of anti-colonial resistant narration that could implode colonialism. While Manchuria state destroyed a basic mind of national harmony(民族協和). Han Seolya's <Daeruk(대륙)> had an insight to colonial desire of a private citizen capitalist who devoted to colonial management of an empire in Manchuria state. As Han Seloya did not deny completely a frame of Manchuria state that had close relation to Japanese empire, he had a dream for an accompanied world, national harmony(民族協和), capital paradise that could not be caught by colonialism of Japanese empire through love transcending race and nationality. Like intending to narrative strategy of Lee Taejun, Han Seolya also tried to a new possibility of anti-colonial resistant narration by striking back naturally a sight of an empire. Manchuria could be a strategic position to Lee Taejun and Han Seolya to newly seek for anti-colonial resistant narration with a possibility to implode colonialism through narrative realization that was different from in Chosun.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 이태준, "일제말기 문인들의 만주체험" (2007), 역락
  2. 이태준, "이민부락견문기 in: 일제말기 문인들의 만주체험" (2007), 역락
  3. 한설야, "식민주의와 비협력의 저항: 일제말 전시기 일본어 소설선 2" (2003), 역락
  4. 고명철, "한설야 문학의 일제에 대한 비협력 및 저항의 맥락 in: 탈식민주의를 넘어서" (2006), 소명출판
  5. 고토 겐이치, "동남아시아에 대한 일본의 인식 변화", 아시아, (봄) (2008)
  6. 김성경, "인종적 타자의식의 그늘 - 친일문학론과 국가주의", 민족문학사연구, 24(봄), pp.126~158 (2004), 민족문학사학회
  7. 김예림, "1930년대 후반 근대인식의 틀과 미의식" (2004), 소명출판
  8. 김윤식, "염상섭 연구" (1987), 서울대출판부
  9. 김재용, "협력과 저항" (2004), 소명출판
  10. 김? 철, "몰락하는 신생:‘만주’의 꿈과 농군의 오독", 상허학보, 9 (2002)
  11. 박영석, "만보산 사건 연구" (1978), 아세아문화사
  12. 배주영, "1930년대 만주를 통해 본 식민지 지식인의 욕망과 정체성", 한국학보, (가을) (2003)
  13. 신주백, "만주인식과 파시즘 국가론 in: 일제하 지식인의 파시즘체제 인식과 대응" (2005), 혜안
  14. 윤대석, "‘만주’와 한국문학자 in: 식민지 국민문학론" (2006), 역락
  15. 윤휘탁, "만주국의 ‘2등 국(공)민’, 그 실상과 허상", 역사학보, 169 (2001), 169집
  16. 임성모, "만주국협화희의 대민지배정책과 그 실태", 동양사학연구, 42 (1993)
  17. 하정일, "1930년대 후반 한설야 문학과 자기 성찰의 깊이 in: 한설야 문학의 재인식" (2000), 소명출판
  18. 하정일, "탈식민의 미학" (2008), 소명출판
  19. 한석정, "만주국 건국의 재해석" (2007), 동아대출판부
  20. 호사카 유우지, "일본제국주의의 민족동화정책 분석" (2002), 제이엔씨
  21. 홍기돈, "식민지 말기 이태준의 소설과 백산 안희제 in: 근대를 넘어서려는 모험들" (2007), 소명출판

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)