근대 문학자의 한자어 인식과 국문/한글 문체

Abstract

The modern “Korean” discourse was influenced by linguistic nationalism, which projected the existence of the nation into language. The arguments of the “Korean” discourse and the reality of the “Hangul” sentence were both overlapping and fragmented. This article examines the changes in the perception of Sino-Korean words by the writers, focusing on the issues of Chinese/Chinese characters/ Sino-Korean words that have been continuously raised in the process of forming Hangul sentences. The central problem in establishing the Hangul written system in the 1910s was 'the unification of spoken and written language'. It was a matter of vocabulary and phrases order in which were arranged. Even if a phrase with Chinese grammar added to it is in a sentence, it is possible to make a sentence by intervening with the Korean to[토] or grammatical element that connects the Chinese verses together. The degree of involvement in Chinese grammar, exposed/non-exposed Chinese characters, and frequency of use of Sino-Korean words did not matter. In the 1930s, the question of the exclusion of Chinese characters/Sino-Korean words from the side that insisted on the ideological notation and the acceptance of Chinese characters/ Sino-Korean words from the side that insisted on the phonetic notation was raised. Literature writers favored the ideological notation, but to expand the expression range of Korean sentences, they allowed the display of Chinese characters to be exposed and tried to maintain the unique area of ​​Sino-Korean words that were not replaced by others. In the 1950s, there was a movement to establish a “pure” Korean language through the exclusion of Chinese characters and Sino-Korean words. Literature writers did not agree with the cause of the language movement anymore and tried to understand the degree to which Sino-Korean words permeated their lives and to accept them as part of the Korean language that did not expose Chinese characters. The problem of Chinese characters/Sino-Korean words is constantly intervening in the formation of Hangul sentences. The reason why a complete transition to the Korean style was achieved is that the establishment of the national script was in line with the time of the essential state formation. However, unless all of the Sino-Korean words are replaced by pure Korean words, we can still be said to be included in the final stage of the Korean-Chinese style. It is necessary to reconsider the way that Korean and Korean-Chinese styles have been regarded as confronting.