본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

최근 3년간 수입 유연탄 분석 및 연소열성능 해석을 활용한 석탄화력 발전소 탄종 경제성 평가 연구

Economic Evaluation of Coals Imported in Last 3 Years for Power Plant Based on Thermal Performance Analysis

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In this study, the economic evaluation for imported coals was conducted for power plant based on thermodynamical performance analysis. The number of coal types considered was 1,755 imported by five power generation companies in Korea during the 2010-2012. The higher heating value (HHV) of the coals ranged 4,000-6,500 kcal/kg, mostly sub-bituminous. The 1D thermo-dynamical performance modeling was performed for a 500 MWe standard power plant using PROATES code. It was founded that the low rank coals had negative effects on the plant efficiency mainly due to the increased heat loss by moisture, hydrogen and flue gas. Based on the performance analysis, the economic performance of the coals was evaluated. The apparent price of low-rank coals tended to be significantly lower than design coal; for example, the unit price of coal with a HHV of 4,000 kcal/kg was 57% of the reference coal having 6,080 kcal/kg. Considering the negative effects leading to a decrease in the thermal performance, heating value compensation, and increased parasite load, the corrected unit cost for the coal with 4,000 kcal/kg was 90.7% of the reference coal. Overall, the cost saving by imported coals was not high as expected.

Abstract

In this study, the economic evaluation for imported coals was conducted for power plant based on thermodynamical performance analysis. The number of coal types considered was 1,755 imported by five power generation companies in Korea during the 2010-2012. The higher heating value (HHV) of the coals ranged 4,000-6,500 kcal/kg, mostly sub-bituminous. The 1D thermo-dynamical performance modeling was performed for a 500 MWe standard power plant using PROATES code. It was founded that the low rank coals had negative effects on the plant efficiency mainly due to the increased heat loss by moisture, hydrogen and flue gas. Based on the performance analysis, the economic performance of the coals was evaluated. The apparent price of low-rank coals tended to be significantly lower than design coal; for example, the unit price of coal with a HHV of 4,000 kcal/kg was 57% of the reference coal having 6,080 kcal/kg. Considering the negative effects leading to a decrease in the thermal performance, heating value compensation, and increased parasite load, the corrected unit cost for the coal with 4,000 kcal/kg was 90.7% of the reference coal. Overall, the cost saving by imported coals was not high as expected.

참고문헌 (4)

  1. "KEPCO in BRIEF 2012", ~ (2012)
  2. E.on-UK, "PROATES User's manual", ~ (2008)
  3. 한국발전교육원, "화력발전효율실무", ~ (2010)
  4. H 화력 발전소, "년간 운전 data sheet, H 화력 발전소", ~ (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)