한국전쟁기 북한에서 미술인의 전쟁 수행 역할에 대한 연구
North Korean Artists During the Korean War
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay examines North Korean art as part of the preparation for the Korean War, which North Korea had been geared for since Kim Il-Sung took power, by focusing on the artists who were active in North Korea during the Korean War. As a way of mobilizing the public, art served as a powerful means of propaganda in socialism. In North Korea, art education for art's sake was prohibited; instead, art education as part of the preparation for war was encouraged and the activities of artists during the war were an outcome of such education. With this as a premise, this essay explores art education in North Korea right before the Korean War and the role of North Korean artists during the Korean War. During the war, the government exercised its power, emphasizing its authority to take retaliatory actions against its people, and the nation submitted themselves to the government in a state of national emergency. During the Korean War, many North Korean artists came to South Korea and equally many South Korean artists went to North Korea. However, even right after the liberation of Korea from Japan and before the war when the 38thparallel was already established, some artists chose to work in North Korea by crossing the 38th parallel. Therefore, the artists who went to North Korea can be divided largely into three groups: those who went to the northern peninsula before the war, those who went after the restoration of Seoul, and those who went after the war. There were also artists who grew up and lived in North Korea. They were affiliated with many socialist organizations and leagues and devoted to socialist art. There was also a group of artists who did not have professional education in art but allied themselves and worked as artists after North Korea established itself as a nation. Finally, there was another group of artists which was newly identified during this study. They were artists who studied art in the Soviet Union and were included in the talent education program after the war. Even during the period of the Korean War, artists in North Korea produced many works with Kim Il-Sung as the major theme, including Kim's portrait. Also, they were actively engaged in propaganda more than ever before, as art was a critical means of propaganda during the war.In fact, the flyers and posters produced by North Korean artists far outnumbered those by Korean armies and the U.N. forces. Newspapers and publications by North Korea were widely distributed across the peninsula, which included 7,000 posters of "Kim's Portrait" and 4,000 posters of "the Portrait of Stalin." One group of artists produced and distributed 15,000 fliers of "Actions for the Expulsion of the U.S. Forces," 80,000 flyers of the "Expulsion of the U.S. Forces," and 8,000 posters of the "Statement for the Expulsion of the U.S. Forces." The propaganda paintings for victory in the war were considered a privilege only the artists loyal to the communist party or with a strong sense of patriotism could produce and artwork produced during that period was also limited to propaganda. The posters and flyers seen in the pictures in South Korea tend to inspire military actions through the portrayal of military soldiers or by highlighting cruelty by the U.S. forces through the depiction of South Korean people inpain. Propaganda paintings during wars require persuasive power and incitement more than any other art genre, especially when the illiteracy rate was high and the public did not have access to printed matter like newspapers and magazines. Propaganda paintings should be readily understandable and convincing to the public. Accordingly, North Korean art at that time focused heavily on simplicity so that the public could easily understand the message it attempted to convey. As a result, it is speculated that the artists who produced propaganda paintings during the Korean War had been obsessed with the conception that art based on socialist realism should be readily understandable and thus faithful to socialist doctrines. Since the Korean War, the North Korean leader Kim Il-Sung actively utilized art and established socialist art, making the public believe that fantasy or utopia was real. An understanding of art in North Korea as a means of shaping a nation gives a glimpse of North Korean art as kitsch art.
Abstract
This essay examines North Korean art as part of the preparation for the Korean War, which North Korea had been geared for since Kim Il-Sung took power, by focusing on the artists who were active in North Korea during the Korean War. As a way of mobilizing the public, art served as a powerful means of propaganda in socialism. In North Korea, art education for art's sake was prohibited; instead, art education as part of the preparation for war was encouraged and the activities of artists during the war were an outcome of such education. With this as a premise, this essay explores art education in North Korea right before the Korean War and the role of North Korean artists during the Korean War. During the war, the government exercised its power, emphasizing its authority to take retaliatory actions against its people, and the nation submitted themselves to the government in a state of national emergency. During the Korean War, many North Korean artists came to South Korea and equally many South Korean artists went to North Korea. However, even right after the liberation of Korea from Japan and before the war when the 38thparallel was already established, some artists chose to work in North Korea by crossing the 38th parallel. Therefore, the artists who went to North Korea can be divided largely into three groups: those who went to the northern peninsula before the war, those who went after the restoration of Seoul, and those who went after the war. There were also artists who grew up and lived in North Korea. They were affiliated with many socialist organizations and leagues and devoted to socialist art. There was also a group of artists who did not have professional education in art but allied themselves and worked as artists after North Korea established itself as a nation. Finally, there was another group of artists which was newly identified during this study. They were artists who studied art in the Soviet Union and were included in the talent education program after the war. Even during the period of the Korean War, artists in North Korea produced many works with Kim Il-Sung as the major theme, including Kim's portrait. Also, they were actively engaged in propaganda more than ever before, as art was a critical means of propaganda during the war.In fact, the flyers and posters produced by North Korean artists far outnumbered those by Korean armies and the U.N. forces. Newspapers and publications by North Korea were widely distributed across the peninsula, which included 7,000 posters of "Kim's Portrait" and 4,000 posters of "the Portrait of Stalin." One group of artists produced and distributed 15,000 fliers of "Actions for the Expulsion of the U.S. Forces," 80,000 flyers of the "Expulsion of the U.S. Forces," and 8,000 posters of the "Statement for the Expulsion of the U.S. Forces." The propaganda paintings for victory in the war were considered a privilege only the artists loyal to the communist party or with a strong sense of patriotism could produce and artwork produced during that period was also limited to propaganda. The posters and flyers seen in the pictures in South Korea tend to inspire military actions through the portrayal of military soldiers or by highlighting cruelty by the U.S. forces through the depiction of South Korean people inpain. Propaganda paintings during wars require persuasive power and incitement more than any other art genre, especially when the illiteracy rate was high and the public did not have access to printed matter like newspapers and magazines. Propaganda paintings should be readily understandable and convincing to the public. Accordingly, North Korean art at that time focused heavily on simplicity so that the public could easily understand the message it attempted to convey. As a result, it is speculated that the artists who produced propaganda paintings during the Korean War had been obsessed with the conception that art based on socialist realism should be readily understandable and thus faithful to socialist doctrines. Since the Korean War, the North Korean leader Kim Il-Sung actively utilized art and established socialist art, making the public believe that fantasy or utopia was real. An understanding of art in North Korea as a means of shaping a nation gives a glimpse of North Korean art as kitsch art.
참고문헌 (61)
- "대중 속에 뿌리박은 예술 ; 해방일보 , 1950. 9. 4", ~ (1950)
- "화가의 눈 ; 조선일보 , 1949. 5. 4., 5. 6", ~ (1949)
- "빨치산 자료집" (1996), 한림대학교 아시아 문화연구소
- "위대한 수령 김일성 동지의 전기 , 1-2" (1982), 평양로동당출판사
- "조선미술사2" (1987), 조선미술가동맹
- "조선조각사2" (1991), 조선미술출판사
- "오늘의 풍경화" (2003), 문학예술출판사
- "조선미술년감 1985" (1985), 문예출판사
- A. 기토비차, "1946년 북조선의 가을,우리는 조선을 다녀왔다" (1980), 글누림
- 강정구, "분단과 전쟁의 한국현대사" (1996), 역사비평사
- 국사편찬위원회, "남조선인민대표자대회에서 당선된 조선최고인민회의대의원명단 in:북한관계사료집 , 6권", pp.159~160 (1988)
- 극동문제연구소, "북한총람 1945-1968" (1968), 극동문제연구소
- 김광운, "북한 정치사 연구" (2003), 선인
- 김기진, "끝나지 않은 전쟁:국민보도연맹" (2002), 역사비평사
- 김남식, "남로당연구" (1984), 돌베개
- 김면, "구(舊)동독이 본 북한체제의 형성과 발전 in: 해외자료로 본 북한체제의 형성과 발전", pp.238~271 (2006), 선인
- 김복기, "개화의 요람 평양 화단의 반세기", 계간미술, pp.98~108 (1987)
- 김성보, "남북한 경제구조의 기원과 전개-북한 농업체제의 형성을 중심으로" (2000), 역사비평사
- 김용준, "정계에 보내는 나의 건의 , 동아일보 , 1946. 8. 20", 동아일보, ~
- 김용준, "고구려벽화고분연구" (1958), 과학원출판사
- 김용진, "풍진 세월 예술에 살며:근원수필" (1988), 을유문화사
- 김재원, "景福宮夜話" (1991), 탐구당
- 김진송, "이쾌대" (1995), 열화당
- 김하영, "북한 체제의 초기 집단정체성 형성에 관한 연구 in: 해외자료로 본 북한 체제의 형성과 발전", pp.158~201 (2006), 선인
- 김현숙, "한국근대미술에서의 동양주의 연구", 박사, pp.2001
- 라종일, "끝나지 않은 전쟁:한반도와 강대국 정치 1950-54" (1994), 전예원
- 리재현, "조선력대미술가편람" (1999), 문학예술종합출판사
- 문영대, "러시아 한인화가 변월룡과 북한에서 온 편지" (2004), 문화가족
- 박명림, "한국 1950:전쟁과 평화" (2002), 나남출판
- 박영택, "1930년대 전후의 프롤레타리아미술운동 및 해방직후 좌익운동에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1988
- 북한연구소, "북한총람" (1983)
- 성혜랑, "등나무집" (2000), 지식나라
- 세종연구소 북한연구센터, "북한의 사회문화" (2006), 한울아카데미
- 역사문제연구소 기획, "사진과 그림으로 보는 북한현대사" (2004), 웅진닷컴
- 역사문제연구소, "1950년대 남북한의 선택과 굴절" (1998), 역사비평사
- 유홍준, "朝鮮畵의 제한된 성공 '色의 力動'에 밀린 水墨의 전통미학 in; 중앙일보 , 1999. 1. 23", ~ (1999)
- 이정, "북한문화예술인명사전" (2002), 동방미디어 웹문서
- 이경희, "근원 김용준의 회화와 비평활동 연구", 석사, 미학․미술사학과, pp.1997
- 이구열, "북한미술50년" (2001), 돌베개
- 이기봉, "북의 문학과 예술인" (1986), 사사연
- 이동현, "이슈로 본 한국현대사" (2002), 민연
- 이용필, "남북분단과 사상적 갈등" (1991), 인간사랑
- 이윤규, "들리지 않던 총성 종이폭탄" (2006), 지식더미
- 이일, "북한의 미술" (1990), 고려원
- 이쾌대, "북조선 미술계 보고", 신천지 (1947)
- 장우성, "화맥인맥" (1982), 중앙일보사
- 정형민, "한국미술사에 있어서 근대성 논의(2)-김용준을 중심으로-", 미술사학연구, 211 (1996), 한국미술사학회
- 조영복, "월북 예술가,오래 잊혀진 그들" (2002), 돌베개
- 조은정, "1950년(월북)이후 근원 김용준의 활동에 대한 연구", 인물미술사학, (1), pp.171~208 (2005), 인물미술사학회
- 조은정, "한국전쟁기 남한미술인의 전쟁체험에 대한 연구 in: 한국문화연구", pp.139~193 (2002), 이화여대한국문화연구원
- 조은정, "대한민국 제1공화국의 권력과 미술의 관계에 대한 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 조은정, "1950년대 전반 한국미술에서 他者읽기", 미술사학연구, 240 (2003), 한국미술사학회
- 최열, "김용준의 초기 미학․미술론", 미술연구, (4) (1994)
- 최열, "김용준-민족미술의 방향을 제시한 근대 화단의 才士", 월간미술 (1989)
- 최열, "논쟁의 소용돌이 속에서 지새운 한평생", 가나아트, pp.170~175 (1994)
- 최열, "월북 조소예술가들-김복진 탄신 100주년 기념 강연회 원고", 조형연구, (3) (2002), 경원대학교 조형연구소
- 최열, "최고의 논객 김용준", 가나아트 (1994)
- 최태만, "근원 김용준의 비평론 연구", 한국근대미술사학, 7 (2000)
- 토비 클락, "20세기 정치 선전예술" (2000), 예경
- 한국역사연구회 현대사연구반, "한국현대사2" (1993), 풀빛
- 한국정신문화연구원, "한국전쟁과 사회구조의 변화" (1999), 백산서당
