본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

명재(明齋) 윤증(尹拯) 초상의 제작 과정과 정치적 함의

The Drawing Process of Yunjeung’s Portrait and its Political Implications

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류미술

초록

Yunjeung(尹拯, 1629~1714) is one of the representative Neo-Confucianists (性理學者) in late 17th and early 18th century. He led a unique life as he never received any government post due to personal, ideational, and political suppression for his Neo-Confucian theory of faith and justice though the king granted him one as a prime minister. Most of the Neo-Confucianists in those days had their portrait drawn, but Yunjeung refused it strictly when his descendants and disciples tried to draw one of his. Thereby, his disciples and descendants disguised a painter named Byeonryang (卞良) as a Sien-pi(선비; 士大夫, gentleman) so that he could peek him to draw one. And he finished it at last after a lot of complications for three months from April till June, 1711. Neo-Confucianists from the early and middle of Joseon Dynasty did not have their portraits drawn for their Neo-Confucian ritual ideology whereas those in the middle and end of it had their portraits done aggressively for Neo-Confucian significance of self-discipline. However, Yunjeung did not have one drawn for the political suppression resulted from his Neo-Confucian theory of faith and justice based on his and his father’s extraordinary lives. However, Yunjeung’s descendants and disciples knew a portrait could be highly effective to unify families, academic schools, or political parties at that time when Sanrim (山林; famous Neo-Confucianists retired to hermitage in the mountain and forest) or Bungdang (朋黨; Faction) politics was developed and No-ron(老論; The Old Doctrine) and So-ron(少論; The Young Doctrine) were in severe confrontation. This is why they secretly drew his portrait despite his prohibition. The reason they drew his portrait in the summer of 1711 is that the situation was more vital and the political suppression on them was gotten rid of around that time as Yunjeung was appointed as a prime minster and both his father and grandfather were revered as ones, too. And in his portrait, he wears a simple and ordinary Dopo (道袍; clothes for the gentleman to wear in usual times) and Banggun (方巾; a square hat for the gentleman to wear in usual times) unlike other typical Neo-Confucianists of the time like Song Siyeol(宋時烈, 1607~1689) who is in Simui (深衣; a typical uniform for Neo-Confucianists) and Bokgun (幅巾; a typical hat for Neo-Confucianists) in this portrait following the example of Zhuzi (朱熹, 1130~1200). This is not just because he did normally wear Dopo and Banggun regarding himself as a jingsa (徵士; a gentleman without a government post though one has been granted by the king) but because he could not consider himself as one of the moralists or followers of Zhuzi like Song Siyeol or did not mean to call himself that since he was in severe conflict with Song personally, academically, or politically. In this sense, Yunjeung’s portrait can be considered as a crucial example which opens a new view to understanding of the characteristics and meanings of portraits in the middle and end of Joseon(朝鮮) Dynasty from a perspective of political context.

Abstract

Yunjeung(尹拯, 1629~1714) is one of the representative Neo-Confucianists (性理學者) in late 17th and early 18th century. He led a unique life as he never received any government post due to personal, ideational, and political suppression for his Neo-Confucian theory of faith and justice though the king granted him one as a prime minister. Most of the Neo-Confucianists in those days had their portrait drawn, but Yunjeung refused it strictly when his descendants and disciples tried to draw one of his. Thereby, his disciples and descendants disguised a painter named Byeonryang (卞良) as a Sien-pi(선비; 士大夫, gentleman) so that he could peek him to draw one. And he finished it at last after a lot of complications for three months from April till June, 1711. Neo-Confucianists from the early and middle of Joseon Dynasty did not have their portraits drawn for their Neo-Confucian ritual ideology whereas those in the middle and end of it had their portraits done aggressively for Neo-Confucian significance of self-discipline. However, Yunjeung did not have one drawn for the political suppression resulted from his Neo-Confucian theory of faith and justice based on his and his father’s extraordinary lives. However, Yunjeung’s descendants and disciples knew a portrait could be highly effective to unify families, academic schools, or political parties at that time when Sanrim (山林; famous Neo-Confucianists retired to hermitage in the mountain and forest) or Bungdang (朋黨; Faction) politics was developed and No-ron(老論; The Old Doctrine) and So-ron(少論; The Young Doctrine) were in severe confrontation. This is why they secretly drew his portrait despite his prohibition. The reason they drew his portrait in the summer of 1711 is that the situation was more vital and the political suppression on them was gotten rid of around that time as Yunjeung was appointed as a prime minster and both his father and grandfather were revered as ones, too. And in his portrait, he wears a simple and ordinary Dopo (道袍; clothes for the gentleman to wear in usual times) and Banggun (方巾; a square hat for the gentleman to wear in usual times) unlike other typical Neo-Confucianists of the time like Song Siyeol(宋時烈, 1607~1689) who is in Simui (深衣; a typical uniform for Neo-Confucianists) and Bokgun (幅巾; a typical hat for Neo-Confucianists) in this portrait following the example of Zhuzi (朱熹, 1130~1200). This is not just because he did normally wear Dopo and Banggun regarding himself as a jingsa (徵士; a gentleman without a government post though one has been granted by the king) but because he could not consider himself as one of the moralists or followers of Zhuzi like Song Siyeol or did not mean to call himself that since he was in severe conflict with Song personally, academically, or politically. In this sense, Yunjeung’s portrait can be considered as a crucial example which opens a new view to understanding of the characteristics and meanings of portraits in the middle and end of Joseon(朝鮮) Dynasty from a perspective of political context.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. "肅宗實錄", ~, pp.肅宗實錄
  2. "肅宗實錄補闕正誤", ~, pp.肅宗實錄補闕正誤
  3. "承政院日記", ~, pp.承政院日記
  4. 尹拯, "明齋遺稿"
  5. 尹東洙, "明齋先生年譜"
  6. 尹光紹, "明齋言行錄"
  7. 尹東洙, "敬庵遺稿"
  8. 尹光紹, "敬庵先生年譜"
  9. 尹光紹, "素谷先生遺稿"
  10. 尹仁基, "影堂紀蹟"
  11. 河演, "敬齋集"
  12. 魚有鳳, "咸從世稿"
  13. 曺好益, "家禮考證"
  14. 坡平尹氏魯宗派譜刊行委員會, "坡平尹氏魯宗派譜" (1983)
  15. 金濟謙, "安東金氏世譜" (1833)
  16. 東萊鄭氏林塘公派宗親會, "東萊鄭氏林塘公派譜" (1994)
  17. 全義禮安李氏大同譜刊行委員會, "全義李氏姓譜" (1992)
  18. 강관식, "조선시대 초상화의 圖像과 心像", 美術史學, 15 (2001), 한국미술사교육연구회
  19. 강관식, "털과 눈: 조선시대 초상화의 祭儀的 命題와 造形的 課題", 미술사학연구, 248(248), pp.95~129 (2005), 한국미술사학회
  20. 권정안, "윤증 유학의 심학적 연원 - 탄옹 권시를 중심으로, in: 명재 윤증의 학문연원과 가학" (2006), 충남대학교 유학연구소
  21. 김길락, "명재 윤증의 심학, in: 명재 윤증의 생애와 사상" (2001), 충남대학교 유학연구소
  22. 문화재청, "한국의 초상화" (2007), 눌와
  23. 朴奭遠, "明齋言行錄" (1994), 坡平尹氏魯宗派丙舍大宗中
  24. 유봉학, "조선후기 학계와 지식인" (1998), 신구문화사
  25. 李康七, "朝鮮名人肖像大鑑" (1972), 探究堂
  26. 이강칠, "역사인물초상화대사전" (2003), 현암사
  27. 이성무, "조선시대 당쟁사" (2007), 아름다운날
  28. 이은순, "조선후기 당쟁사 연구" (1988), 일조각
  29. 이태호, "옛 화가들은 우리 얼굴을 어떻게 그렸나" (2008), 생각의나무
  30. 조선미, "초상화 연구" (2007), 문예출판사
  31. 조선미, "韓國 肖像畵 硏究" (1983), 悅話堂
  32. 조선미, "한국의 초상화" (2009), 돌베개
  33. 충남대학교 유학연구소, "명재 윤증" (2002), 청계출판사
  34. 황의동, "宋時烈과 尹拯의 갈등과 학문적 차이", 동서철학연구, (40), pp.169~190 (2006), 한국동서철학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)