본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국 상법상 이사의 의무와 책임추궁

Liabilities of Directors and its Enforcement under Korea Commercial Code

1

조회

0

다운로드

18

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

This article deals with liabilities and its enforcement under Korea Commercial Code. In order to enforce liabilities of directors, the Code provides several devices that shareholders may bring derivative suits and ask injunction against directors. It is required all shareholders’ consent that a director's liability be released under the Code. It is almost impossible to get all shareholders’ consent in shareholder meeting, especially in the listed company's meetings. In Japan, until the revision of 2001 Japan Commercial Act has had the same regulation as in Korea. However, 2001 Commercial Act and 2005 Corporation Act have allowed the limitation and mitigation of directors’ liability. In the United States, since Smith v. Van Gorkom the development in permitting reasonable protection of directors’ from exposure of personal liability, so that directors would not be discouraged from fully and freely carrying out their duties, including risk-taking business. Model Business Corporation Act allows the inclusion of a provision in the articles of incorporation eliminating or limiting, with certain exceptions, the liability of the directors to the corporation or its shareholders for money damages. Almost states and ALI regulations have the similar position. One hand, in discharging their duties directors must always perform in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation. On the other hand, the business judgment of the board has also been protected under the above stated principles. Moreover, a division between negligence and gross negligence is to be considered toward the admission of proportionate liability in the future. Although 2007 Draft of Commercial Code offers the exemption of directors’ liability against the company, it does not have effectiveness due to the impossibility of getting harmonization among all stakeholders.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 권기범, "현대회사법론", ~ (2001)
  2. 서정갑, "주석실무 개정상법총", ~ (1984)
  3. 서돈각, "상법강의(상)" (1999), 법문사
  4. 손주찬, "상법(상)" (2002), 박영사
  5. 손주찬, "주석상법(Ⅱ-하)" (1989), 한국사법행정학회
  6. 이기수, "회사법학" (1997), 박영사
  7. 이병태, "상법(상)", ~ (1988)
  8. 이원석, "신상법(상)", ~ (1984)
  9. 이철송, "회사법강의" (2008), 박영사
  10. 정동윤, "회사법" (2001), 법문사
  11. 정찬형, "상법강의" (2009), 박영사
  12. 최기원, "신회사법론" (2001), 박영사
  13. 최문희, "이사의 손해배상책임의 제한" (2007), 서울대학교 법학연구소
  14. 김병연, "이사의 충실의무와 영미법상 신인의무(Fiduciary duty)", 상사법연구, 24(3), pp.61~82 (2005), 한국상사법학회
  15. 김병연, "상법상 이사의 책임제한에 대한 연구", 비교사법, 15(1), pp.237~268 (2008), 한국비교사법학회
  16. 자본시장친화적인 회사법제 개선방안, 연구용역보고서, "김병연", 한국증권법학회, ~ (2006)
  17. 김성호, "미국에서의 이사의 감시의무와 책임의 완화", 상사법연구, 19(3) (2001), 한국상사법학회
  18. 안성포, "理事의 免責에 관한 立法論的 考察 ― 責任免除와 和解를 중심으로 ―", 상사법연구, 22(2), pp.85~132 (2003), 한국상사법학회
  19. 이균성, "CEO의 책임과 경영판단의 원칙", 상장협, 45 (2002)
  20. 사외이사 선임제도 개선방안에 관한 연구, "이형규", 한국상장협의회, ~, pp.상장협 연구보고서 2002-3 (2002)
  21. 상법 중 회사편(일반)에 대한 개정의견, 상법개정연구보고서, "이형규", 한국상사법학회, ~ (2005)
  22. 정동윤, "주주의 대표소송, 실무상의 문제점을 중심으로", 사법논집, 2 (1972), 법원행정처
  23. 최문희, "이사의 회사에 대한 손해배상책임 면제 규정의 재해석― 판례와 학설에 대한 비판적 고찰 ―", 상사법연구, 27(4), pp.9~52 (2009), 한국상사법학회
  24. 상법개정연구보고서, "한국증권법학회", ~ (2006)
  25. William L. Cary, "Federalism and Corporate Law: Reflections Upon Delaware", Yale L. J., 83, pp.663~ (1974)
  26. John C. Coffee Jr, "No Exit? : Opting Out, The Contractual Theory of the Corporation, and the Special Case of Remedies", Brook. L. Rev., 53, pp.919~ (1988)
  27. James J. Hanks, Jr, "Evaluating Recent State Legislation on Director and Officer Liability Limitation and Indemnification", Bus. Law, 43, pp.1207~ (1988)
  28. Charles W. Murdock, "Corporate Governance - The Role of Special Litigation Committee", Wash. L. Rev., 68, pp.79~ (1993)
  29. Alan R. Palmiter, "Reshaping the Corporate Fiduciary Model: A Director's Duty of Independence", Tex. L. Rev., 67, pp.1351~ (1989)
  30. Patrick J. Ryan, "Strange Bedfellows: Corporate Fiduciaries and the General Law Compliance Obligation in Section 2.01(A) of the American Law Institute's Principles of Corporate Governance", Wash. L. Rev., 66, pp.413~ (1991)
  31. 江頭憲治郞, "株式會社法" (2006), 有斐閣
  32. 新谷 承, "取締役の責任輕減化と株主代表訴訟", 法律時報, 71(2) (1999)
  33. 大阪谷公雄, "信託法の硏究(上)", ~ (1991)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)