본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

우리나라 금융감독체계의 문제점 및 개선방안

The Problems of Current Korean Financial Supervisory System and Suggestion for Financial Supervisory Independence and Accountability

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

There is lots of criticism in Korea that our financial supervisory system have been working properly especially, during the 2007-2008 global financial crisis and customers have been successfully protected. This Article analyze recent trends in, and types of, financial supervisory governance in leading countries. The result shows that most of countries have been promptly responding in dealing with the changes of the global financial circumstance. The result also shows that quality of financial supervisory governance plays a decisive role to cope with financial crisis. We also found that the solid independence and accountability arrangements are essential pillars of supervisory governance. The IMF's analysis of the determinants indicates that solid independence and accountability arrangements are essential pillars of supervisory governance. In this paper, we take a closer look at the emerging independence and accountability arrangements for financial supervisors. Besides, along with the issue of reforming present financial supervisory system into efficient one and better financial customer protection, there are clash of opinion which system would be recommendable among present integrated one and so-called twin-peaks one in Korea. This Article also compare merit and demerits of the two systems. The paper is structured as follows: Section Ⅱ research into major countries reforming examples of financial supervisory system which is some background to the research presented in this paper; Section Ⅲ discusses the problems of current Korean financial supervisory system and supervisory independence and accountability of supervisors; Section Ⅳ suggests the desirable financial supervisory system in Korea, as well as suggestions for further research.

Abstract

There is lots of criticism in Korea that our financial supervisory system have been working properly especially, during the 2007-2008 global financial crisis and customers have been successfully protected. This Article analyze recent trends in, and types of, financial supervisory governance in leading countries. The result shows that most of countries have been promptly responding in dealing with the changes of the global financial circumstance. The result also shows that quality of financial supervisory governance plays a decisive role to cope with financial crisis. We also found that the solid independence and accountability arrangements are essential pillars of supervisory governance. The IMF's analysis of the determinants indicates that solid independence and accountability arrangements are essential pillars of supervisory governance. In this paper, we take a closer look at the emerging independence and accountability arrangements for financial supervisors. Besides, along with the issue of reforming present financial supervisory system into efficient one and better financial customer protection, there are clash of opinion which system would be recommendable among present integrated one and so-called twin-peaks one in Korea. This Article also compare merit and demerits of the two systems. The paper is structured as follows: Section Ⅱ research into major countries reforming examples of financial supervisory system which is some background to the research presented in this paper; Section Ⅲ discusses the problems of current Korean financial supervisory system and supervisory independence and accountability of supervisors; Section Ⅳ suggests the desirable financial supervisory system in Korea, as well as suggestions for further research.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 고동원, "개편된 금융감독기구의 문제점과 개선 방향", 금융법연구, 5(1), pp.113~139 (2008), 한국금융법학회
  2. 고동원, "현행 금융감독기구 체제의 문제점과 개편 방향", 성균관법학, 24(2), pp.441~475 (2012), 법학연구소
  3. 김대식, "통합금융감독기구의 변천과 향후의 개편방향", 금융연구, 10(1), pp.201~239 (2005), 한국금융학회
  4. 김용재, "금융감독기구의 현황 및 문제점", 법학논총, 17 (2005)
  5. 김홍기, "미국 도드-프랭크법의 주요 내용 및 우리나라에서의 시사점", 금융법연구, 7(2), pp.45~90 (2010), 한국금융법학회
  6. 성희활, "금융소비자보호법의 바람직한 제정 방향에 대한 고찰 -통합 금융분쟁조정원(가칭)의 설립을 제안하며-", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.715~766 (2011), 한국상사법학회
  7. 안수현, "금융감독시스템과 금융소비자 보호 : 해외 금융감독시스템 개편동향과 시사점", 상사판례연구, 24(2), pp.449~502 (2011), 한국상사판례학회
  8. 양기진, "금융감독기구의 구조 설계에 관한 소고 -쌍봉형 감독기구의 도입검토와금융소비자보호원 설립논의를 중심으로-", 은행법연구, 5(2) (2012), 은행법학회
  9. 윤석헌, "금융감독체계 개편, 어떻게 할 것인가?", 2012년 한국금융학회 정기학술대회 특별 정책심포지엄 발표자료집 (2012)
  10. 전성인, "유인부합적 금융감독체계 구축방안", SIRFE Occasional Paper 09-P07 (2009), 서울대학교 금융경제연구원
  11. 외부 전문기관에 대한 검사위탁 방안, "정찬형", 금융법학회, ~ (2012)
  12. 한국은행, "조문별 해설 한국은행법", 한국은행 법규실, ~ (2012)
  13. Donato Masciandaro, "Designing Financial Supervision Institutions - Independence, In Accountability and Governance" (2007), Edward Elgar Publishing
  14. European Commission, "Commission proposes new ECB powers for banking supervision as part of a banking union", press release, ~ (2012)
  15. Financial System Inquiry Final Report (Wallis report), "Financial System Inquiry", Australian Government Publishing Service, ~ (1997)
  16. FSA, "Business Plan", ~ (2012)
  17. Report of the HIH Royal Commission, , HIH Royal Commission, ~ (2003)
  18. Financial Supervisory Independence and Accountability, "IMF", IMF Working Paper, ~ (2007)
  19. Global Financial Stability Report -Financial Stress and Deleveraging Macrofinancial Implications and Policy, "IMF", ~ (2008)
  20. Marc Quintyn, "How Much Independence for Supervisors in Financial Market Regulation?", QFinance
  21. Michael Tylor, "Regulatory reform after the financial crisis: twin peaks revisited, PPT presentation for Law and Finance Senior Practitioner Lectures", ~ (2011)
  22. Parliament of Australia, "Inquiry into the collapse of Trio Capital and any other related matters", ~ (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)