1주 발행 주식회사의 법률관계
Legal issues on single stock corporation
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is possible to issue a single stock and single stock corporations exist in foreign countries. This article analyzes legal issues on single stock corporations and explores benefits of issuing a single stock. A single stock can be owned by one person, unincorporated entities, partnership or multiple persons. It is critical to identify a stockholder depending on the type of ownership in relation to issues on exercising shareholder’s rights and restriction on transfer of ownership of stock or shares. Co-authors conclude that a stockholder is unincorporated entities and partnership themselves and respective co-owners based on the principle that one who acquires a stock is a stockholder. Internal decision making in unincorporated entities and partnership is made according to the Civil Code and unincorporated entities and partnership exercise their stockholders’ right against stock corporations. In case of co-ownership, however, it is reasonable to apply analogically corporation law because the decision making process among co-owners is similar to that in general stockholders meeting. It is observed that provisions on listing, different kinds of stocks and acquirement of treasury stocks do not apply to single stock corporations. Single stock corporations would be a favorable tool in maintaining its personal closeness and escaping procedural requirements for stockholders’ meeting and their resolutions. For these reasons, it can be a useful type for special purpose vehicles and paper companies.
Abstract
It is possible to issue a single stock and single stock corporations exist in foreign countries. This article analyzes legal issues on single stock corporations and explores benefits of issuing a single stock. A single stock can be owned by one person, unincorporated entities, partnership or multiple persons. It is critical to identify a stockholder depending on the type of ownership in relation to issues on exercising shareholder’s rights and restriction on transfer of ownership of stock or shares. Co-authors conclude that a stockholder is unincorporated entities and partnership themselves and respective co-owners based on the principle that one who acquires a stock is a stockholder. Internal decision making in unincorporated entities and partnership is made according to the Civil Code and unincorporated entities and partnership exercise their stockholders’ right against stock corporations. In case of co-ownership, however, it is reasonable to apply analogically corporation law because the decision making process among co-owners is similar to that in general stockholders meeting. It is observed that provisions on listing, different kinds of stocks and acquirement of treasury stocks do not apply to single stock corporations. Single stock corporations would be a favorable tool in maintaining its personal closeness and escaping procedural requirements for stockholders’ meeting and their resolutions. For these reasons, it can be a useful type for special purpose vehicles and paper companies.
참고문헌 (44)
- 강현중, "민사소송법" (2004), 박영사
- 김재형, "민법총칙 제8판(전면개정)" (2012), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "물권(2)" (1992), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "채권(9)" (1999), 박영사
- 고상룡, "민법총칙" (2001), 법문사
- 김용담, "주석민법 물권법(2)", 한국사법행정학회
- 김상용, "민법총칙" (2009), 화산미디어
- 김용진, "(신통본)민사소송법" (2005), 신영사
- 김정호, "회사법" (2013), 법문사
- 김준호, "민법강의 : 이론·판례·사례" (2014), 법문사
- 김홍규, "민사소송법" (2004), 삼영사
- 나승성, "회사법개설" (2010), 한국학술정보
- 박준서, (2000), 한국사법행정학회
- 박준서, "(5)" (1999), 한국사법행정학회
- 손주찬, "주석상법 회사법(2)" (2003), 한국사법행정학회
- 송덕수, "신민법강의", 박영사
- 송옥렬, "상법강의" (2013), 홍문사
- 오현수, "(통·번역을 통해 쉽게 읽는)일본 회사법" (2013), 진원사
- 이시윤, "신민사소송법" (2013), 박영사
- 이철송, "회사법강의" (2014), 박영사
- 임재연, "미국기업법" (2009), 박영사
- 정동윤, "상법上" (2000), 법문사
- 전병서, "민사소송법강의" (2002), 법문사
- 江頭憲治部, "株式會社法" (2012), 有斐閣
- 강태성, "이른바 총유에 대한 비판적 검토", 민사법연구, 15(1) (2007)
- 김동민, "會社分割의 株主總會에서 特別利害關係人이 갖는 議決權의 範圍", 상사판례연구, 22(3), pp.339~358 (2009), 한국상사판례학회
- 김지환, "상법상 무액면주식제도에 관한 법적 쟁점 검토", 법학연구, 23(2), pp.135~165 (2012), 법학연구소
- 김진현, "권리능력 없는 사단", 민사법학, (11·12) (1995), 한국민사법학회
- 김태주, "주식배당의 본질", 법학논고, 9 (1993), 경북대학교 법학연구소
- 南潤鳳, "法人格 없는 社團과 總有", 법학논총, 23(1), pp.1~24 (2006), 법학연구소
- 류승훈, "민법상 조합에 대한 권리주체성 및 당사자능력의 인정과 관련하여", 민사소송, 11(1), pp.101~124 (2007), 한국민사소송법학회
- 박상근, "공유주식의 권리행사", 강원법학, 10 (1998), 강원대학교
- 박진태, "판례회고 : 제2편 회사", 상사판례연구 (2002), 한국상사판례학회
- 이국현, "社員權論의 實效的 意義- 재건축․재개발 조합을 중심으로", 민사판례연구, (33), pp.1~37 (2011), 민사판례연구회
- 이덕승, "현대민법의 전망(범주서영배박사회갑기념)" (1995), 경상대학교 법학연구소
- 이시윤, "신민사소송법" (2013), 박영사
- 이호정, "우리 민법상의 공동소유제도에 대한 약간의 의문-특히 합유와 총유를중심으로", 법학, 24(2·3) (1983), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 임홍근, "상법전의 총칙·상행위 : 과거, 현재 및 미래", 상사법연구, 21(3), pp.1~37 (2002), 한국상사법학회
- 유주선, "독일법상 민법상 조합의 권리능력", 기업법연구, 20(1), pp.379~404 (2006), 한국기업법학회
- 전소현, "공유지분의 침해와 그 구제", 법학과, pp.2013
- 진상욱, "비법인사단의 총유물의 관리 및 처분", 토지법학, 25(1), pp.69~96 (2009), 한국토지법학회
- 정대근, "판례회고 : 제3편 회사 ; 실질적으로 1인회사인 주식회사 주주총회의절차상의 하자", 상사판례연구 (1994), 한국상사판례학회
- 최수정, "조합재산에 관한 민법개정 방향 - 합유와 조합의 사무집행 방법을 중심으로 -", 민사법학, 62, pp.3~35 (2013), 한국민사법학회
- 홍춘의, "법인 아닌 사단의 법률관계", 토지법학, 26(2), pp.103~136 (2010), 한국토지법학회