본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상환전환우선주의 발행현황과 문제

Issuance of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Related Problems

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Recently, Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Related Problems(hereinafter, the "RCPS") has become a major method for corporations to raise capital. This trend was caused by the recent economic crisis when the corporations have suffered difficulties in raising capital by issuing corporate bonds. Also, changes in the legal environment, meaning that issue of various class shares has been allowed through the amendment to the Commercial Code in 2011, has attributed to such increase in the issuance of the RCPS. As the newly adopted or revised provisions in the 2011 amendment are not functionally structured and the legislation intention is not made clear, there is confusion in interpreting concerned provisions. Among other problems or confusion, class shares is one of the examples and particularly, the RCPS stands amid such controversy. The RCPS needs to be reviewed from the view of a new trend that shares and bonds are approaching or combined together in the capital market. It is presumable that the situation where shares are more and more approaching to bonds could be accelerated because the issuance of class shares combining various rights would be more prevalent. An issue regarding the concept or definition of class shares or whether ordinary shares is considered one type of class shares is being repeated in reviewing on redeemable shares and convertible shares. It is provided that class shares only excluding redeemable shares and convertible share can be issued as redeemable shares. However, such provision is causing confusion in the interpretation of such provision. This issue is directly related to the issue of whether the RCPS can be issued under the current Commercial Code. It depends on the legal structure of the RCPS to determine whether the issuance of the RCPS is prohibited or not based on the wording in parenthesis of Article 345, Paragraph 5 under the Commercial Code. The provisions on the redeemable shares are not clear and as such, the issuance of the RCPS cannot be deemed null and void based on such unclear provisions. The equal treatment among shareholders can be another issue in the RCPS since the shareholder status would be sensitively affected according to calculation of redeemable payment, types of payment method, convertible reasons, convertible ratio, etc. Further, it needs to be reviewed on the legal status of the RCPS which has both characteristics of shares and bonds. The Commercial Code(strictly speaking, the Company Act) should paly a role in providing legal ground for the structure of shares combining various rights reflecting corporations' needs. However, the purposes of the regulation regarding the issuance of shares under the Commercial Code should stress on providing guidelines for protection of shareholders or investors and resolution of conflict of interest among various stakeholders. Accordingly, corporations shall be granted discretion to the extent that the corporations can determine specific terms and contents for the issuance.

Abstract

Recently, Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Related Problems(hereinafter, the "RCPS") has become a major method for corporations to raise capital. This trend was caused by the recent economic crisis when the corporations have suffered difficulties in raising capital by issuing corporate bonds. Also, changes in the legal environment, meaning that issue of various class shares has been allowed through the amendment to the Commercial Code in 2011, has attributed to such increase in the issuance of the RCPS. As the newly adopted or revised provisions in the 2011 amendment are not functionally structured and the legislation intention is not made clear, there is confusion in interpreting concerned provisions. Among other problems or confusion, class shares is one of the examples and particularly, the RCPS stands amid such controversy. The RCPS needs to be reviewed from the view of a new trend that shares and bonds are approaching or combined together in the capital market. It is presumable that the situation where shares are more and more approaching to bonds could be accelerated because the issuance of class shares combining various rights would be more prevalent. An issue regarding the concept or definition of class shares or whether ordinary shares is considered one type of class shares is being repeated in reviewing on redeemable shares and convertible shares. It is provided that class shares only excluding redeemable shares and convertible share can be issued as redeemable shares. However, such provision is causing confusion in the interpretation of such provision. This issue is directly related to the issue of whether the RCPS can be issued under the current Commercial Code. It depends on the legal structure of the RCPS to determine whether the issuance of the RCPS is prohibited or not based on the wording in parenthesis of Article 345, Paragraph 5 under the Commercial Code. The provisions on the redeemable shares are not clear and as such, the issuance of the RCPS cannot be deemed null and void based on such unclear provisions. The equal treatment among shareholders can be another issue in the RCPS since the shareholder status would be sensitively affected according to calculation of redeemable payment, types of payment method, convertible reasons, convertible ratio, etc. Further, it needs to be reviewed on the legal status of the RCPS which has both characteristics of shares and bonds. The Commercial Code(strictly speaking, the Company Act) should paly a role in providing legal ground for the structure of shares combining various rights reflecting corporations' needs. However, the purposes of the regulation regarding the issuance of shares under the Commercial Code should stress on providing guidelines for protection of shareholders or investors and resolution of conflict of interest among various stakeholders. Accordingly, corporations shall be granted discretion to the extent that the corporations can determine specific terms and contents for the issuance.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. 권기범, "현대회사법론" (2012), 삼영사
  2. 권종호, "일본회사법 상" (2014), 법무부
  3. 김건식, "회사법" (2015), 박영사
  4. 김순석, "주식회사법대계 1" (2013), 법문사
  5. 송옥렬, "상법강의 제5판" (2015), 서울
  6. 이철송, "회사법강의(제20판)" (2012), 박영사
  7. 임재연, "회사법 I" (2012), 박영사
  8. 정찬형, "상법강의(상)" (2014), 박영사
  9. 구승모, "상법회사편 입법과정과 향후과제", 선진상사법률연구, (55), pp.115~137 (2011), 법무부
  10. 권오성, "상환주식에 관한 연구", 법학논총, 19(2), pp.519~546 (2012), 법학연구원
  11. 권재열, "개정상법상 주식관련제도의 개선내용과 향후과제", 선진상사법률연구, (56), pp.1~30 (2011), 법무부
  12. 권종호, "적대적 M&A와 회사법개정", 기업법연구, 20(3), pp.67~94 (2006), 한국기업법학회
  13. 권종호, "방어수단으로서 종류주식 ― 2006년 개정안과 2008년 개정안을 중심으로 ―", 상사법연구, 27(2), pp.51~77 (2008), 한국상사법학회
  14. 江頭憲治郞, "日本の新會社法による株式制度の改正", 증권법연구, 7(1), pp.1~19 (2006), 한국증권법학회
  15. 김순석, "주식회사법대계 1" (2013), 법문사
  16. 김순석, "주식제도의 개선 - 종류주식을 중심으로 -", 상사법연구, 28(3), pp.131~173 (2009), 한국상사법학회
  17. 김지환, "종류주주간의 이해조정에 관한 연구", 상사판례연구, 22(2), pp.79~114 (2009), 한국상사판례학회
  18. 김태진, "주주평등원칙에 관한 소고", 기업법연구, 22(3), pp.9~52 (2008), 한국기업법학회
  19. 김홍기, "2011년 개정상법 및 동법시행령상 회사재무분야의 주요쟁점과 해석 및 운용상의 과제", 기업법연구, 26(1), pp.107~146 (2012), 한국기업법학회
  20. 김희준, "종류주식 발행의 실무상 쟁점과 법적 해결방안에 관한 연구-상환 및 전환에 관한 종류주식을 중심으로-", 선진상사법률연구, (64), pp.122~146 (2013), 법무부
  21. 문준우, "미국 회사법상 종류주식에 관한 小考", 강원법학, 33, pp.307~328 (2011), 비교법학연구소
  22. 박철영, "종류주식의 활용과 법적 과제 - 의결권제한주식을 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, 25(4), pp.9~42 (2011), 한국기업법학회
  23. 박철영, "종류주식의 확대와 주주간 이해조정", 상사법연구, 24(2) (2005), 한국상사법학회
  24. 의결권배제·제한에 관한 종류주식 도입 현황 및 영향, "배윤정", 기업지배구조원, ~, pp.CGS Report 제3권 9호 (2013)
  25. 성희활, "종류주식에 대한 법적 고찰", KRX Market 제113호(한국거래소, 2014. 7), ~ (2014)
  26. 2014 주주총회 이슈 점검: 회사 전환 종류주식, "송민경", 기업지배구조원, ~, pp.CGS Report 제4권 6호 (2014)
  27. 송옥렬, "2011년 개정 회사법의 해석상 주요쟁점 - 기업재무 분야를 중심으로 -", 저스티스, (127), pp.45~79 (2011), 한국법학원
  28. 송종준, "개정상법상 지배구조의 변화요소와 활용방안", 상장협연구, (64) (2011), 한국상장회사협의회
  29. 송종준, "상장회사의 자기자본질서의 변화와 법적 과제 - 개정 상법과 자본시장법 개정안상 몇 가지 쟁점을 중심으로 -", 상사법연구, 31(2), pp.143~179 (2012), 한국상사법학회
  30. 심영, "개정상법상 종류주식에 대한 고찰", 일감법학, (22), pp.109~138 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
  31. 안수현, "Hybrid Equity Finance법제의 평가와 과제 — 종류주식 개정 관련 이슈 —", 경영법률, 22(4), pp.1~37 (2012), 한국경영법률학회[DOI]
  32. 양만식, "종류주식의 다양화가 기업지배에 미치는 영향", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.35~71 (2011), 한국상사법학회
  33. 이승환, "종류주식의 활용방안에 관한 고찰", 법학연구, 23(1), pp.41~66 (2013), 법학연구원
  34. 정동윤, "주식제도에 관한 연구-종류주식을 중심으로-", 대한민국학술원논문집, 49(1) (2010), 대한민국학술원
  35. 정동윤, "보통주와 종류주의 개념에 관하여-개정상법의 해석과 관련하여-", 상사법연구, 31(1), pp.37~53 (2012), 한국상사법학회[DOI]
  36. 정수용, "개정상법상 종류주식의 다양화", BFL, (51) (2012), 서울대학교 금융법센터
  37. 정승화, "혼합증권에 관한 법적 연구", 박사, 법학과, pp.2012
  38. 최완진, "종류주식의 다양화에 관한 법적 고찰", 경영법률, 20(1), pp.247~271 (2009), 한국경영법률학회
  39. 韓元圭, "償還株式과 轉換株式의 法的 性質", 증권법연구, 3(1), pp.273~310 (2002), 한국증권법학회
  40. 江頭憲治郞, "株式会社法" (2014), 有斐閣
  41. 江頭憲治郞, "会社法大系 II" (2008), 靑林書院
  42. 山田豊, "事業會社のハイブリッド 證券", 日經公社債情報 No. 1561, ~ (2006)
  43. 伊藤步, "ハイブリッドで資本構造を柔軟化", 金融 ビジネス, ~ (2007)
  44. 後藤 文人, "ハイブリッド證券が問うわが資本市場の成熟度", 金融財政事情, ~ (2008)
  45. Andreas Cahn, "Comparative Company Law" (2010), Cambridge
  46. Louise Gullifer, "Corporate Finance Law Principles and Policy" (2011), Hart Publishing
  47. Patricia Ann Metzer, "The Impact of Section 306 Upon Convertible Preferred Stock Issued in A Corporate Reorganization", University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 116(5) (1968)
  48. Anthony D. Weis, "Raising Capital Through Convertible Preferred Stock Offerings", The Bankers’ Statement, the Summer 2014, ~ (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)