해킹정보이용행위와 내부자거래 -최근 미국의 이론과 판례를 중심으로-
Computer Hacking and Insider Trading - Recent Theories and Court Decisions in U.S -
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Hacking into a computer system to obtain financial information and trading securities based on that information must be regulated by insider trading regulations because this activity also harms the integrity of securities market and the protection of investors. However, under the traditional insider trading theories developed by U.S. Supreme Court, such as a fiduciary duty theory and the misappropriation theory, liability is premised on a fiduciary’s duty to disclose about material nonpublic information in a securities transaction with corporate shareholders or the source of the material nonpublic information used in the securities transaction. Recently, the Second Circuit Court of Appeal in Dorozhko held that a breach of fiduciary duty was not required for such hacking and trading to be a violation of §10(b) and Rule 10b-5. This decision challenges the common assumption under the traditional insider trading theories. This article examines and evaluates the recent Dorozhko case and its decision by U.S. 2nd Circuit as well as its implication on future Supreme Court rulings. This article then compares Dozozhk to the differing legal system in Korea. Finally, this article maintains the necessity to revise the §174 provision of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act in a direction to encompass outsider’s hacking and trading case in a certain degree.
Abstract
Hacking into a computer system to obtain financial information and trading securities based on that information must be regulated by insider trading regulations because this activity also harms the integrity of securities market and the protection of investors. However, under the traditional insider trading theories developed by U.S. Supreme Court, such as a fiduciary duty theory and the misappropriation theory, liability is premised on a fiduciary’s duty to disclose about material nonpublic information in a securities transaction with corporate shareholders or the source of the material nonpublic information used in the securities transaction. Recently, the Second Circuit Court of Appeal in Dorozhko held that a breach of fiduciary duty was not required for such hacking and trading to be a violation of §10(b) and Rule 10b-5. This decision challenges the common assumption under the traditional insider trading theories. This article examines and evaluates the recent Dorozhko case and its decision by U.S. 2nd Circuit as well as its implication on future Supreme Court rulings. This article then compares Dozozhk to the differing legal system in Korea. Finally, this article maintains the necessity to revise the §174 provision of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act in a direction to encompass outsider’s hacking and trading case in a certain degree.
참고문헌 (13)
- 김병태, "關係會社와 關聯된 內部者去來規定 適用上의 問題點", 증권법연구, 3(2), pp.215~276 (2002), 한국증권법학회
- 이상복, "자본시장법상 내부자거래" (2010), 박영사
- 임재연, "자본시장법" (2010), 박영사
- 홍복기, "자본시장법 제1조", 경제법연구, 9(1), pp.139~154 (2010), 한국경제법학회
- Bainbridge, Stephen M., "Insider Trading Regulation: The Path Dependent Choice Between Property Rights and Securities Fraud", SMU Law Review, 52, pp.1589~ (1999)
- Bainbridge, Stephen M., "Incorporating State Law Fiduciary Duties into the Federal Insider Trading Prohibition", Washington & Lee Law Review, 52, pp.1189~ (1995)
- Langevoort, Donald C., "Words from on High about Rule 10b-5: Chiarella's History, Central Bank’s Future", Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 20, pp.865~ (1995)
- Nagy, Donna M., "Insider Trading and the Gradual Demise of Fiduciary Principles", Iowa Law Review, 94, pp.1315~ (2009)
- Nagy, Donna M., "Securities Litigation and Enforcement: Cases and Materials 2d ed" (2008)
- Painter, Richard W., "Don’t Ask, Just Tell: Insider Trading After United States v. O’Hagan", Virginia Law Review, 84, pp.153~ (1998)
- Prentice, Robert A., "The Internet and Its Challenges for the Future of Insider Trading Regulation", Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 12, pp.263~ (1998)
- Pritchard, A.C., "United States v. O’Hagan: Agency Law and Justice Powell's Legacy for the Law of Insider Trading", University Law Review, 78, pp.13~ (1998)
- Seligman, Joel, "A Mature Synthesis: O’Hagan Resolves “Insider” Trading’s Most Vexing Problems", Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 23, pp.1~ (1998)