한국채택국제회계기준상 연결실체의 판단기준에 대한 법리적 분석
A Legal Analysis of Criterion on Consolidated Entities under the K-IFRS
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
K-IFRS has come into effect since 2011. Internal auditors and outside auditors shall make reports on consolidated financial statements. Consolidated entities are to be selected first for that purpose. The author analyses ‘control’ and ‘de facto control’ which are the criterion in identifying consolidated entities from a legal view point. In addition, he deals with related issues including superior control, exemption of consolidation,affiliated company, joint venture and audit on subsidiary by an auditor of parent. Some practical points to be noted are presented as conclusion, (1) As control means decision making power in a legal context, it is deemed to have control if one has a voting power over 50%. However, it is not the case when the resolution requirement is tightened. (2) It is not counted as shares with voting power when voting power of nonvoting stocks is exceptionally revived, controlled company owns stocks of controlling company, and converting power is exercised during the shareholders’ list is closed. (3) Agreement on voting right, voting trust and assignment of voting power should be considered in counting voting rights. (4) The existence of voting right should be verified in case when a controlled company issues stock call option, convertible stock, convertible bond and redeemable share. (5) In order to prove the existence of control, several situation might be considered including distribution of shares and pattern of exercise of voting right. 30% of criteria under the Outside Audit Act should not be treated as an evidence in identifying the de facto control.
Abstract
K-IFRS has come into effect since 2011. Internal auditors and outside auditors shall make reports on consolidated financial statements. Consolidated entities are to be selected first for that purpose. The author analyses ‘control’ and ‘de facto control’ which are the criterion in identifying consolidated entities from a legal view point. In addition, he deals with related issues including superior control, exemption of consolidation,affiliated company, joint venture and audit on subsidiary by an auditor of parent. Some practical points to be noted are presented as conclusion, (1) As control means decision making power in a legal context, it is deemed to have control if one has a voting power over 50%. However, it is not the case when the resolution requirement is tightened. (2) It is not counted as shares with voting power when voting power of nonvoting stocks is exceptionally revived, controlled company owns stocks of controlling company, and converting power is exercised during the shareholders’ list is closed. (3) Agreement on voting right, voting trust and assignment of voting power should be considered in counting voting rights. (4) The existence of voting right should be verified in case when a controlled company issues stock call option, convertible stock, convertible bond and redeemable share. (5) In order to prove the existence of control, several situation might be considered including distribution of shares and pattern of exercise of voting right. 30% of criteria under the Outside Audit Act should not be treated as an evidence in identifying the de facto control.
참고문헌 (14)
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제9판)" (2006), 박영사
- 권기범, "현대회사법론, 제3판" (2010), 삼영사
- 이철송, "회사법강의, 제18판" (2010), 박영사
- 정동윤, "상법(상), 제4판" (2009), 법문사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상), 제13판" (2010), 박영사
- 최기원, "신회사법론, 제13개정판" (2009), 박영사
- 최준선, "회사법, 제3판" (2007), 삼영사
- 内藤文雄, "連結財務諸表監査" (1999), 中央経済社
- 손성규, "연결재무제표의 주재무제표화에 따른 감사보고서 감리 개선방안 연구", 회계저널, 18(3), pp.103~147 (2009), 한국회계학회
- 오수근, "회계규범 입법론 - 상법 회계규정과 기업회계기준의 일원화를 중심으로", 상장협연구, (53) (2006), 한국상장회사협의회
- IFRS시행에 따른 감사환경 변화와 내부감사의 법적 책임, "오수근", 한국상장회사협의회, ~ (2010)
- 이영한, "국제회계기준 도입에 따른 연결재무제표의 주재무제표화가 재무제표 공시 및 회계감사 관련 제도에 미치는 영향", 회계저널, 18(3), pp.301~330 (2009), 한국회계학회
- 최준선, "상법상 회사회계규정에 대한 소고", 성균관법학, 23(2), pp.353~381 (2011), 법학연구소
- 최현덕, "실질지배(De Facto Control)", 월간 공인회계사 (2010), 한국공인회계사회
