1960년대 ‘연극 대중화’ 운동과 ‘대중’ 담론
The ‘Popularization of Theater’ Movement and the Discourse of ‘the Populace’ in the 1960's
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is generally known that the 1960's was one of the most significant periods in Korean theatrical history. Over the course of this decade, Korean theater changed from modern to contemporary. Among the symptoms of this change were the appearance of a new generation and new theater companies, the pursuit of anti-realist theater, and the emergence of interest in the populace. Inevitably, serious conflicts and confusions arose in dramatic circles, specifically between the old generation and the new generation, between realism and anti-realism, and between commercialism and art-for-art’s-sake. More significantly, this research assumes that the transformation of Korean drama was caused by a change in consciousness for both producers(theater people) and consumers (audiences), both of whom grew increasingly concerned with the new issue of ‘the populace,’ as opposed to the traditional issue of the nation. In analyzing this transformation, this research attempted to find its internal and ultimate motive by exploring the movement of ‘theater popularization’ and the discourse concerning ‘the populace.’ In concrete terms, this research investigated the diverse aspects of theatrical movements for the populace that have been practiced by the dominant theater companies called ‘Sinhyeup’, ‘Sanha’, ‘Minjung’, and ‘Silhum’. In addition, this study analyzed the discourses in which the artistic directors (Hearang Lee, Bumsuk Cha, Keunsam Lee) and those companies declared their own theatrical purposes. As a result of this extensive exploration, this research arrived at the following conclusions. First, throughout the 1960's, the populace was generally recognized as the audience in terms of admission receipts. But the specific audiences for whom each of the artistic directors produced were quite different from one another. In this respect, the popular theater that those directors and companies pursued implied different meanings: theater for a large number of audiences, simple and easy theater, theater in accordance with modern taste and sensibilities, and so on. For this reason, the popular theater ironically displayed each different form as realism and anti-realism. Second, these differences seem to relate to a generational shift. That is to say, the new generation and the old generation regarded the populace and the popular theater from different viewpoints. This difference in viewpoint is significant because it enables us to understand both theatrical phenomena. On one hand, it presents the particularity of 1960's theater, such as its conflicts and confusions, in terms of theatrical forms and techniques for the popular theater. On the other hand, it allows us to infer the reason why the form of Korean theater would change from singular to diverse: from realist theater to various kinds of anti-realism, such as the epic theater or the absurd theater of the 1970's. Finally, the change in producer and audience consciousness toward the populace and the popular theater injected diversity and modernity into 1960's theater. More specifically, the diversity reflected the various theater producers’ different viewpoints, and the modernity resulted from theater people’s strugglesto meet the desires and needs of the populace.
Abstract
It is generally known that the 1960's was one of the most significant periods in Korean theatrical history. Over the course of this decade, Korean theater changed from modern to contemporary. Among the symptoms of this change were the appearance of a new generation and new theater companies, the pursuit of anti-realist theater, and the emergence of interest in the populace. Inevitably, serious conflicts and confusions arose in dramatic circles, specifically between the old generation and the new generation, between realism and anti-realism, and between commercialism and art-for-art’s-sake. More significantly, this research assumes that the transformation of Korean drama was caused by a change in consciousness for both producers(theater people) and consumers (audiences), both of whom grew increasingly concerned with the new issue of ‘the populace,’ as opposed to the traditional issue of the nation. In analyzing this transformation, this research attempted to find its internal and ultimate motive by exploring the movement of ‘theater popularization’ and the discourse concerning ‘the populace.’ In concrete terms, this research investigated the diverse aspects of theatrical movements for the populace that have been practiced by the dominant theater companies called ‘Sinhyeup’, ‘Sanha’, ‘Minjung’, and ‘Silhum’. In addition, this study analyzed the discourses in which the artistic directors (Hearang Lee, Bumsuk Cha, Keunsam Lee) and those companies declared their own theatrical purposes. As a result of this extensive exploration, this research arrived at the following conclusions. First, throughout the 1960's, the populace was generally recognized as the audience in terms of admission receipts. But the specific audiences for whom each of the artistic directors produced were quite different from one another. In this respect, the popular theater that those directors and companies pursued implied different meanings: theater for a large number of audiences, simple and easy theater, theater in accordance with modern taste and sensibilities, and so on. For this reason, the popular theater ironically displayed each different form as realism and anti-realism. Second, these differences seem to relate to a generational shift. That is to say, the new generation and the old generation regarded the populace and the popular theater from different viewpoints. This difference in viewpoint is significant because it enables us to understand both theatrical phenomena. On one hand, it presents the particularity of 1960's theater, such as its conflicts and confusions, in terms of theatrical forms and techniques for the popular theater. On the other hand, it allows us to infer the reason why the form of Korean theater would change from singular to diverse: from realist theater to various kinds of anti-realism, such as the epic theater or the absurd theater of the 1970's. Finally, the change in producer and audience consciousness toward the populace and the popular theater injected diversity and modernity into 1960's theater. More specifically, the diversity reflected the various theater producers’ different viewpoints, and the modernity resulted from theater people’s strugglesto meet the desires and needs of the populace.
참고문헌 (36)
- 김숙현, "드라마센터의 연출가들" (2005), 현대미학사
- 김의경, "실험극장 10년을 맞으면서 in: 실험극장 10년지" (1970)
- 김창남, "대중문화의 이해" (2003), 한울
- 박명진, "연극, in: 한국현대예술사대계 III: 1960년대" (2001), 시공아트
- 백로라, "1960년대 연극과 이데올로기" (2004), 연극과 인간
- 서연호, "우리연극 100년" (2000), 현암사
- 여석기, "‘가을 展望①―演劇’, 『한국일보』, 1963. 9. 10", ~ (1963)
- 오화섭, "‘민중극장 창립공연을 보고’, 『동아일보』, 1963. 5. 3", ~ (1963)
- 원용진, "대중문화의 패러다임" (1996), 한나래
- 유민영, "한국현대희곡사" (1991), 기린원
- 이근삼, "‘연극평―뜻밖에 많은 관객’, 『한국일보』, 1962. 10. 21", ~ (1962)
- 이근삼, "‘이 해의 가장 큰 수확-국립극단의 「산불」 공연’, 『한국일보』, 1962. 12. 29", ~ (1962)
- 이근삼, "‘연극과 대중’, 『서울신문』, 1964. 4. 29", ~ (1964)
- 李明遠, "하나의 증언 In: 극단 산하 10년사" (1974), 극단 산하
- 이영미, "총론, in: 한국현대예술사대계 III: 1960년대" (2001), 시공아트
- 이원경, "‘대중을 위한 중간극―『잉여인간』’, 『동아일보』, 1963. 11. 19", ~ (1963)
- 이원경, "연출 In: 문예연감" (1975), 한국문화예술진흥원
- 이한승, "극단 40年史를 내면서…In: 實驗劇場 40年史" (2001), 극단 실험극장
- 이해랑, "‘연출자의 말’, 『한국일보』 1963. 12. 28", ~ (1963)
- 이해랑, "‘移動劇場 運動을 提唱한다-國民演劇의 진흥을 위하여’, 『한국일보』, 1965. 6. 1", ~ (1965)
- 이해랑, "‘이동극장의 구실과 반성’, 『한국일보』, 1966. 10. 11", ~ (1966)
- 이해랑, "내가 본 극단 산하 In: 극단 산하 10년사" (1974), 극단 산하
- 조상희, "1960년대 동인제 연극운동", 석사, 국어교육학과, pp.2003
- 차범석, "‘연극을 대중의 것으로’, 『서울신문』, 1965. 3. 25", ~ (1965)
- "새로운 물결의 극단 『서울신문』 1963. 1. 30", ~ (1963)
- "「新協」재기공연의 평가-성공했나 得․失은 무엇?『서울신문』, 1963. 6. 12", ~ (1963)
- "‘의욕의 볼륨 드높여- 두 극단의 리허설 한창’, 『동아일보』 1963. 11. 1.선택한 내용을", ~ (1963)
- "‘63년의 鳥瞰-예술계’, 『한국일보』, 1963. 12. 19", ~ (1963)
- "‘실험극장의 리어왕-연기진 사기 높아’, 『동아일보』, 1964. 5.14", ~ (1964)
- "‘炎帝征服한 무대-「新協」公演의 連日滿員은 어디서 온 것인가’, 『한국일보』1964. 7.16", ~ (1964)
- "‘劇團 「山河」’, 『한국일보』, 1967. 1. 31", ~ (1967)
- "‘유과관객 최고기록 세워’, 『주간여성』 1969. 5. 28", ~ (1969)
- Story, John, "대중문화와 문화연구" (2001), 경문사
- [URL]
- [URL]
