재산분할청구권 보전을 위한 사해행위취소권의 요건에 관한 연구
A Study on the Conditions of the Right of Revoking Obligee’s Acts for Preservation of the Right of Matrimonial Property Distribution
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The National Assembly passed the bill about the right of revoking obligee’s acts for preservation of the right of matrimonial property distribution and the bill was coming into effect on 2007. 12. 21. The new clause contains new system that if a party of man and wife will dispose of his or her property, the other party will exercise her or his right of revocation of obligee’s acts. This clause is good for one party who have the right of marital property distribution. But to exercise the right several conditions are required. First, to exercise the right of revoking obligee’s acts he or she has the right of matrimonial property distribution when the other party dispose his or her property that should be divided. But the right of matrimonial property distribution comes into existence when they get a divorce. So this clause has to prescribe the relationship between divorce and the right of matrimonial property distribution. Second, to exercise the right of revoking obligee’s acts the obligee does not have enough property to discharge his or her liabilities. To measure he or she has enough property or not, he or she and the court have some information about marital property. And the rate of distribution is decided by the man and wife or by the court or by the law. But there is no rule about decision of the rate of distribution. Third, to exercise the right of revoking obligee’s acts the obligee and beneficiary have the intention of injuring the rights or interests of the other party of man and wife. But if he or she has not the intention about injury, when a party dispose his or her property, the other party can not revoke the acts of a party. The right of revoking obligee’s acts for preservation of the right of matrimonial property distribution is very important in actual affairs. But it can properly work when another clauses about marital property system are passed in the future. I expect that the bill of marital property system will pass in 18th national assembly.
Abstract
The National Assembly passed the bill about the right of revoking obligee’s acts for preservation of the right of matrimonial property distribution and the bill was coming into effect on 2007. 12. 21. The new clause contains new system that if a party of man and wife will dispose of his or her property, the other party will exercise her or his right of revocation of obligee’s acts. This clause is good for one party who have the right of marital property distribution. But to exercise the right several conditions are required. First, to exercise the right of revoking obligee’s acts he or she has the right of matrimonial property distribution when the other party dispose his or her property that should be divided. But the right of matrimonial property distribution comes into existence when they get a divorce. So this clause has to prescribe the relationship between divorce and the right of matrimonial property distribution. Second, to exercise the right of revoking obligee’s acts the obligee does not have enough property to discharge his or her liabilities. To measure he or she has enough property or not, he or she and the court have some information about marital property. And the rate of distribution is decided by the man and wife or by the court or by the law. But there is no rule about decision of the rate of distribution. Third, to exercise the right of revoking obligee’s acts the obligee and beneficiary have the intention of injuring the rights or interests of the other party of man and wife. But if he or she has not the intention about injury, when a party dispose his or her property, the other party can not revoke the acts of a party. The right of revoking obligee’s acts for preservation of the right of matrimonial property distribution is very important in actual affairs. But it can properly work when another clauses about marital property system are passed in the future. I expect that the bill of marital property system will pass in 18th national assembly.
참고문헌 (18)
- 곽윤직, "채권총론" (2003), 박영사
- 송덕수, "신민법강의" (2008), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "채권(2)" (1995), 박영사
- 박준서, "주석민법 채권총칙(2)" (2000), 한국사법행정학회
- 전주혜, "재산분할제도의 실증적 고찰", 석사, pp.2005
- 中川淳, "財産法と家族法の交錯" (1984), 入花書房
- 김소연, "재산분할 판례를 통해 본 9년의 변화", 2008년 여성의 경제적 권리 확보를 위한 제3차 정책연구포럼 자료집 (2008)
- 김숙자, "민법학의 회고와 전망 in: 이혼으로 인한 재산분할청구권", 민법전시행30주년기념논문집, 한국민사법학회, ~ (1993)
- 김유미, "재산분할청구권에 관한 소고", 가족법연구, 22(2), pp.79~110 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- 민유숙, "가정법원사건의 제문제(상) in: 가사비송사건으로서의 재산분할" (2003), 법원도서관
- 박기준, "가사소송법 일부개정법률안 검토보고서(정부제출)", ~ (2007)
- 박기준, "민법 일부개정법률안 검토보고서(정부제출)", ~ (2007)
- 박보영, "실무연구Ⅳ in: 재산분할의 실태조사", 법관 가사재판실무연구모임 자료집, 서울가정법원, ~ (1999)
- 윤진수, "민법개정안 중 부부재산제에 관한 주제발표", 민법(친족․상속편)개정 공청회자료집, 법무부, ~ (2006)
- 전경근, "부부재산제 개정안에 관한 연구", 가족법연구, 20(3), pp.47~72 (2006), 한국가족법학회
- 전경근, "재산분할청구권의 피보전채권성", 가족법연구, 17(1), pp.4~163 (2003), 한국가족법학회
- 조은희, "독일법상 이혼시 잉여의 청산과 그 문제점에 관한 고찰", 가족법연구, 16(1), pp.9~340 (2002), 한국가족법학회
- 홍춘의, "프랑스법에 있어서 법정부부재산제", 가족법연구, 15(1) (2001), 한국가족법학회
