본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유언의 취소

Cancellation of a Will

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Whether a will can be avoidable based on fraud, duress or mistake should not be determined indiscriminately. This question can be solved according to kind of contents of a will. When a testator makes a will which contains a denial if paternity, an acknowledgement of paternity or the designation of guardian by fraud, duress or mistake, a will is invalid for lack of real intention. However If a will contains prohibition of division of inherited property, designation of method of division, establishment of foundation, testamentary gift or appointment of executor, a will can be avoidable by inheritors. They also ratify a voidable will. Korean Civil Code section146 should be so for the period which inheritors can execute the right. The executor of a will can't execute the right of cancellation. The inheritors should execute the right of cancellation to whom gets the benefit from will directly.

Abstract

Whether a will can be avoidable based on fraud, duress or mistake should not be determined indiscriminately. This question can be solved according to kind of contents of a will. When a testator makes a will which contains a denial if paternity, an acknowledgement of paternity or the designation of guardian by fraud, duress or mistake, a will is invalid for lack of real intention. However If a will contains prohibition of division of inherited property, designation of method of division, establishment of foundation, testamentary gift or appointment of executor, a will can be avoidable by inheritors. They also ratify a voidable will. Korean Civil Code section146 should be so for the period which inheritors can execute the right. The executor of a will can't execute the right of cancellation. The inheritors should execute the right of cancellation to whom gets the benefit from will directly.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 곽윤직, "민법총칙(제7판)" (2007), 박영사
  2. 곽윤직, "상속법(개정판)" (2004), 박영사
  3. 김주수, "주석민법 상속(2)" (2009), 한국사법행정학회
  4. 김준호, "민법총칙(전정판)" (2009), 법문사
  5. 김규완, "민법학강의(제10판)" (2011), 신조사(서울)
  6. 박동섭, "친족상속법(3정판)" (2009), 박영사
  7. 박동섭, "가사소송법(3정판)" (2003), 박영사
  8. 백태승, "민법총칙(제5판)" (2011), 법현재
  9. 송덕수, "민법총칙" (2011), 박영사
  10. 송덕수, "신민법강의(제2판)" (2009), 박영사
  11. 신영호, "가족법강의" (2011), 세창출판사
  12. 윤진수, "재산법과 비교한 가족법의 특성 - 가족법의 이타성과 합리성", 민사법학, (36), pp.579~612 (2007), 한국민사법학회
  13. 이경희, "가족법(전정판)" (2008), 법원사
  14. 지원림, "민법강의(제7판)" (2009), 홍문사
  15. 한복룡, "가족법강의 (개정판)" (2008), 충남대학교 출판부
  16. Brox, "Erbrech" (2010), Vahlen
  17. Frank, "Erbrecht" (2010), C.H.Beck
  18. Jauernig, "BGB Kommentar" (2009), C.H.Beck
  19. Nieder, "Handbuch der Testamentsgestaltung" (1992), C.H.Beck
  20. 近藤永吉, "判例遺言法" (1938)
  21. 山本正憲, "注釋民法(26) 相續(3)" (1973), 有斐閣
  22. 上野雅和, "注釋民法(26) 相續(3)" (1973), 有斐閣
  23. 阿部徹, "遺言の取消し(撤回) in 講座 現代家族法" (1991), 日本評論社
  24. 二宮周平, "家族法 第3版" (2009), 新世社
  25. 伊藤眞, "親族·相續 補正2版" (2005), 弘文堂

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)