가사소송사건에서 청구의 포기·인낙, 소송상 화해의 허용범위
The Permissibility of the Waiver or Recognition of Claims, and the Compromise in the Family Litigation
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the family litigation case, various opinions confront the interpretation of Article 12 of the Family Litigation Act and Article 220 of the Civil Procedure Act as to whether and to what extent the waiver or recognition of claims, and the compromise in the litigation are permitted. In the family litigation practice, the compromise in the litigation is widely used in judicial divorce cases and judicial waiver of adoption cases, and other categories of family litigation cases are closed with the compromise. Because Article 21 of the Family Litigation Act stipulates that the final and conclusive judgment which has admitted a claim of the family litigation case of Category A or B, shall have the effect on a third person, and after the final and conclusive judgment rejecting a claim under certain requirements, remaining complainants shall not file a litigation again, it is necessary to refer to Article 21 as to what extent to which the waiver, recognition and compromise of a claim with the same effect as the final and conclusive judgment when entered in the trial protocol, are permitted. The draft of full revision of the Family Litigation Act, which the Ministry of Justice submitted to the National Assembly in 2018, allows for the waiver of claims and the compromise in the litigation in cases of judicial divorce and waiver of adoption to reflect the family litigation practice. When the draft is codified, further efforts are needed to protect the interests of third parties on whom the waiver of claims or the compromise in the litigation takes effect.
Abstract
In the family litigation case, various opinions confront the interpretation of Article 12 of the Family Litigation Act and Article 220 of the Civil Procedure Act as to whether and to what extent the waiver or recognition of claims, and the compromise in the litigation are permitted. In the family litigation practice, the compromise in the litigation is widely used in judicial divorce cases and judicial waiver of adoption cases, and other categories of family litigation cases are closed with the compromise. Because Article 21 of the Family Litigation Act stipulates that the final and conclusive judgment which has admitted a claim of the family litigation case of Category A or B, shall have the effect on a third person, and after the final and conclusive judgment rejecting a claim under certain requirements, remaining complainants shall not file a litigation again, it is necessary to refer to Article 21 as to what extent to which the waiver, recognition and compromise of a claim with the same effect as the final and conclusive judgment when entered in the trial protocol, are permitted. The draft of full revision of the Family Litigation Act, which the Ministry of Justice submitted to the National Assembly in 2018, allows for the waiver of claims and the compromise in the litigation in cases of judicial divorce and waiver of adoption to reflect the family litigation practice. When the draft is codified, further efforts are needed to protect the interests of third parties on whom the waiver of claims or the compromise in the litigation takes effect.
참고문헌 (44)
- 강현중, "민사소송법" (2004), 박영사
- 김일룡, "(개정판)민사소송법강의" (2015), 도서출판 오래
- 김홍규, "민사소송법" (2014), 삼영사
- 김홍엽, "민사소송법" (2018), 박영사
- 박동섭, "주석 가사소송법" (2004), 박영사
- 박재완, "민사소송법강의" (2017), 박영사
- 손한기, "민사소송법" (2019), 홍문사
- 송상현, "민사소송법" (2015), 박영사
- 이시윤, "신민사소송법" (2018), 박영사
- 이태영, "민사소송법강의" (2016), 법문사
- 이헌묵, "민사소송법" (2016), 홍문사
- 전병서, "강의 민사소송법" (2018), 박영사
- 전원열, "민사소송법 강의" (2020), 박영사
- 김경욱, "민사소송법" (2017), 법문사
- 정영환, "신민사소송법" (2019), 법문사
- 한충수, "민사소송법" (2018), 박영사
- 호문혁, "민사소송법" (2016), 법문사
- 홍기문, "민사소송법" (2015), 대명출판사
- 가사소송법 개정위원회, "가사소송법 개정자료집", 법원행정처, ~ (2015)
- 민일영, "주석 민사소송법(III)" (2012), 박영사
- 법무부, "가사소송법 전부개정법률안 공청회 자료집", ~ (2017)
- 법원행정처, "법원실무제요 가사(I)" (2010)
- 사법연수원, "가사재판연구" (2016)
- 김상훈, "가사사건의 특수성", 가사소송법 전부개정법률안 공청회 자료집 (2017), 법무부
- 김선혜, "家事裁判의 旣判力", 가족법연구, 23(3), pp.263~312 (2009), 한국가족법학회
- 김성태, "가사조정제도의 문제점과 개선방안에 대한 연구", 민사소송, 19(1), pp.433~473 (2015), 한국민사소송법학회
- 김연, "한국 가사소송법의 법체계적 지위", 민사소송, 14(2), pp.277~310 (2010), 한국민사소송법학회
- 김원태, "가사소송에서의 청구의 포기·인낙 및 소송상 화해의 가부에 관한 검토", 법이론과 실무, 3 (1999)
- 김원태, "민사소송III" (2000), 한국사법행정학회
- 김원태, "일본 신인사소송법의 기본구조와 절차적 특징", 인권과 정의, (338), pp.138~161 (2004), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
- 김원태, "가사조정제도의 문제점과 과제", 비교사법, 13(1), pp.53~84 (2006), 한국사법학회
- 김원태, "가사소송절차에 관한 몇 가지 문제점", 법학연구, 20(1), pp.121~158 (2009), 법학연구소
- 김원태, "가사소송법 전부개정법률안의 특징과 주요 내용", 법조, 66(3), pp.286~340 (2017), 법조협회[DOI]
- 변진장, "가사심판에 있어서 변론주의의 제한", 사법논집, 19 (1988)
- 서정우, (1991)
- 신용호, "양승태 대법원장 재임 3년 주요 판례 평석" (2015)
- 오상걸, "가사조정", 재판자료, 18 (1983)
- 우세나, "가사사건의 기판력", 안암법학, (36), pp.549~574 (2011), 안암법학회[DOI]
- 최성호, "공유물분할소송에서 조정절차에 회부되어 성립된조정에 의한 물권변동에 관한 검토- 대법원 2013.11.21. 선고 2011두1917 전원합의체 판결을 중심으로 -", 법학논고, (46), pp.225~256 (2014), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 피정현, "가사소송에서의 소송자료수집원칙", 가족법연구, 22(2), pp.243~275 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- 한상원, "신분판결의 대세적 효력과 제3자의 지위", 가족법연구, (10) (1996)
- 한상호, "인지청구권 포기의 소송상 화해의 효력", 대법원판례해설, (7) (1988)
- 현소혜, "가사소송사건에서의 처분권주의", 가족법연구, 30(3), pp.321~350 (2016), 한국가족법학회
- 현소혜, "가사소송과 기판력의 주관적 범위", 사법, 1(27), pp.103~133 (2014), 사법발전재단[DOI]