가사사건의 기판력
Res judicata of family litigation, non-litigation and conciliation cases
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
To maintain and promote family peace and the public morals of mutual aid among relatives on the basis of the dignity of personality and the equality of sexes, family litigation act is prescribed special cases, concerning the procedures for litigation, non-litigation and conciliation for by family affairs. This subject deals with issues for res judicata in family procedure. First, I'll study on the subjective scope of res judicate and analyzing the nature of family cases specially focus on Article 2 (1) 1. a. cases of category A. Then l'll study on the meaning of Article 21 (2). Second, I'll study on the problems concerning the objective scope of res judicata. Third, this part is whether receiving recognition of res judicata in a family conciliation case. In family litigation act article 50 is prescribed principle of prefixing conciliation for family litigation cases of categories B and C and family non-litigation cases of category E. We need to review effactivation of a family conciliation case because there is an disagreement between jurists.
Abstract
To maintain and promote family peace and the public morals of mutual aid among relatives on the basis of the dignity of personality and the equality of sexes, family litigation act is prescribed special cases, concerning the procedures for litigation, non-litigation and conciliation for by family affairs. This subject deals with issues for res judicata in family procedure. First, I'll study on the subjective scope of res judicate and analyzing the nature of family cases specially focus on Article 2 (1) 1. a. cases of category A. Then l'll study on the meaning of Article 21 (2). Second, I'll study on the problems concerning the objective scope of res judicata. Third, this part is whether receiving recognition of res judicata in a family conciliation case. In family litigation act article 50 is prescribed principle of prefixing conciliation for family litigation cases of categories B and C and family non-litigation cases of category E. We need to review effactivation of a family conciliation case because there is an disagreement between jurists.
참고문헌 (21)
- 김선혜, "家事裁判의 旣判力", 가족법연구, 23(3), pp.263~312 (2009), 한국가족법학회
- 김연, "민법 親族·相續編과 家事訴訟法의 交錯", 가족법연구, 23(1), pp.107~132 (2009), 한국가족법학회
- 김원태, "가사조정제도의 문제점과 과제", 법률신문, ~ (2005)
- 김원태, "국제이혼의 법적 문제", 가족법연구, 20(1), pp.1~38 (2006), 한국가족법학회
- 정광수, "친족상속법" (2010), 강원대학교출판부
- 김홍규, "친족상속법" (2008), 상영사
- 민유숙, "가사비송절차의 문제점과 개선방향", 가족법연구, 18(2), pp.321~354 (2004), 한국가족법학회
- 법원행정처, "법원실무제요(가사)" (1994)
- 법원행정처, "가사비송재판실무편람" (2004)
- 실무연구: 법관 및 중견간부 세미나 자료집(Ⅱ), "서울가정법원", ~ (1996)
- 서정우, "박병호교수환갑기념, 가족법학논총. In: 새 가사소송법의 개설" (1991)
- 서정우, "특집; 개정가족법에 대한 비판과 전망 - 改正民法의 몇 가지 문제점", 사법행정, 31(6) (1990)
- 양천수, "법적 추론과 논증", 사회과학연구, 30(1) (2010), 영남대학교 사회과학연구소
- 오상진, "이혼원인에 있어서 유책주의와 파탄주의", 재판자료; 가정법원사건의 제문제(상), 101 (2003), 법원도서관
- 유병현, "가사재판의 기판력", 한국가족법학회ㆍ한국민사소송법학회 2009 공동학술대회 (2009)
- 정영환, "신민사소송법" (2009), 세창출판사
- 이현재, "가사사건에 있어서 관련사건의 객관적 · 주관적병합과 관련재판적", 법학논총, 28(1), pp.305~343 (2008), 법학연구소
- 호문혁, "민사소송법 제7판" (2009), 법문사
- 정영환, "신민사소송법" (2009), 세창출판사
- 손종학, "민법강의." (2007), 충남대학교출판부
- 호문혁, "민사소송법 제9판" (2011), 법문사