미국법상 대습상속의 법리 ―통일유언검인법(UPC)상 무유언상속에서의 대습상속을 중심으로―
Rules of succession by representation in the United States ―focusing on intestate succession under the Uniform Probate Code
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper reviews provisions of the Uniform Probate Code(2019) which are relevant to succession by representation with the aim to analyze the difference between the United States and South Korea in terms of rules of succession by representation. As a result, four main differences were identified. First, blended families are taken into account in UPC Section 2-103. It means according to UPC-Section 2-103, half-siblings are entitled to inherit by representation. Furthermore, descendants of the intestate’s deceased spouse(s) who are not descendants of the intestate have inheritance rights, although they are able to inherit only when there are no surviving heirs of the decedent. Second, succession by representation of spouse is not admitted in the United States, which is different from South Korea. Third, the United States, unlike South Korea, a disclaimer of an interest property causes succession by representation. Finally, while per stirpes is adopted in South Korea, per capita at each generation system of representation is incorporated throughout representation by intestate succession under UPC Section 2-103. This paper also reviews the possibility of adoption of per capita at each generation system in South Korea and suggests a direction for relevant provisions in South Korea in granting inheritance rights to half-siblings.
Abstract
This paper reviews provisions of the Uniform Probate Code(2019) which are relevant to succession by representation with the aim to analyze the difference between the United States and South Korea in terms of rules of succession by representation. As a result, four main differences were identified. First, blended families are taken into account in UPC Section 2-103. It means according to UPC-Section 2-103, half-siblings are entitled to inherit by representation. Furthermore, descendants of the intestate’s deceased spouse(s) who are not descendants of the intestate have inheritance rights, although they are able to inherit only when there are no surviving heirs of the decedent. Second, succession by representation of spouse is not admitted in the United States, which is different from South Korea. Third, the United States, unlike South Korea, a disclaimer of an interest property causes succession by representation. Finally, while per stirpes is adopted in South Korea, per capita at each generation system of representation is incorporated throughout representation by intestate succession under UPC Section 2-103. This paper also reviews the possibility of adoption of per capita at each generation system in South Korea and suggests a direction for relevant provisions in South Korea in granting inheritance rights to half-siblings.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김상용, "가족법연구 III" (2010), 법문사
- 김상훈, "미국상속법" (2012), 세창출판사
- 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2020), 박영사
- 윤진수, "친족상속법" (2019), 박영사
- 가정준, "미국법상 실종제도와 동시사망", 재산법연구, 36(2), pp.293~315 (2019), 한국재산법학회[DOI]
- 강승묵, "대습상속의 요건에 관한 소고", 법학논총, 27(3), pp.99~119 (2010), 법학연구소
- 곽동헌, "대습상속", 아세아여성법학, 6(6) (2003), 아세아여성법학회
- 김기영, "대습상속원인으로서의 동시사망의 추정", 연세법학연구, 7(1) (2000), 연세대학교 법학연구원
- 김용호, "동시사망과 대습상속 : 대법원 2001. 3. 9. 선고 99다13157 판결을 중심으로", 법학논총, 26 (2003), 단국대학교 법학연구소
- 김은아, "被代襲者의 配偶者의 代襲相續에 관한 硏究", 법학연구, (26), pp.189~207 (2007), 한국법학회
- 안영하, "대습상속제도의 입법론에 관한 제안", 법학연구, 36, pp.215~251 (2012), 부설법학연구소
- 안영하, "대법원 2001. 3. 9. 선고 99다13157 판결에 대한 판례평석 -소위 괌에서의 KAL기 추락사건-", 가족법연구, 19(2), pp.483~526 (2005), 한국가족법학회
- 안영하, "대습원인으로서서의 상속포기에 관한 입법론적 고찰", 성균관법학, 17(1), pp.351~372 (2005), 법학연구원
- 안영하, "피대습자의 배우자의 대습상속에 관한 입법론적 검토", 성균관법학, 18(2), pp.233~276 (2006), 법학연구원
- 우병창, "2017년 가족법 주요 판례 10선" (2018), 세창출판사
- 이선형, "상속포기의 효과는 대습상속에도 미치는가? - 대법원 2017. 1. 12. 선고 2014다39824판결을 중심으로 -", 동북아법연구, 11(2), pp.475~501 (2017), 동북아법연구소[DOI]
- 이승우, "대습상속소고", 아세아여성법학, 7(7) (2004), 아세아여성법학회
- 이정향, "대습상속 소고", 사회과학논총, 4 (2005), 대구가톨릭대학교 사회과학연구소
- 최성경, "동시사망추정과 배우자 대습상속 -대법원 2001. 3. 9.선고 99다13157판결-", 가족법연구, 19(1), pp.441~471 (2005), 한국가족법학회
- 황근수, "상속법상 대습상속에 관한 법리적 고찰―피대습자의 배우자 및 동시사망의 대습상속", 민사법연구, 15(2) (2007), 대한민사법학
- Gerry W. Beyer, "Wills, Trusts, and Estates" (2019), wolters kluwer
- "Draft for discussion only―revisions of the uniform disclaimer of property interests acts (3. 1999)", ~ (1999)
- "Final Act, With Comments: Uniform Probate Code(1969) (Last Amended or Revised in 2019), 2020", ~ (2020)
- "Uniform Disclaimer of Property Interests Acts(2002", 2010) with prefatory note and comments, 2014, 2014
- "Uniform Parentage Act(2017) with prefatory note and comments, 2017", ~ (2017)