대습상속의 요건에 관한 소고
A Study on Requirement for Succession by Representation
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The ground which recognizes a succession by representation is right in ideology of equity, is in order to correspond even in ground of the modern succession which is a life guarantee of the successor. The succession by representation includes the continent legal system nation and american legal system nation and is recognizing from all countries. Our country the succession by representation from the Joseon Dynasty period after that there is a possibility of seeking. Like this succession by representation about civil law provision from when establishing until currently that provision so is simple. The contents also the interpretation of the part which is various interpretation possibility and call of condolence between is not clearly. According to Korean civil law, Article 1001 (Inheritance by Representation) where a lineal descendant or a brother or sister who would become an inheritor in accordance with the provisions of Article 1000 (1) 1 and 3, has died, or has become disqualified before the commencement of succession, his or her lineal descendants, if any exist, shall become inheritors in the order in which the deceased or disqualified person would have become the inheritor, Article 1003 (Order of Inheritance of Spouse) (2) In the case mentioned in Article 1001, the spouse of the deceased or the disqualified person, before the commencement of inheritance, becomes a co-inheritor in the same order as the inheritors provided in the same Article. If there exists no inheritor, the spouse becomes the sole inheritor. Like this the situation and the unit where the occurrence possibility of succession increases about succession by representation is caused by with provision interpretation coat various problem point and even until currently is a field where the possession of criticism is many. The problem of succession by representation is thought one in the system where the legal sentiment of law affection and the common person collides. The family of actuality from form of the large family changes in the extended family and small family is going. Like this tendency with the fact that will be magnified. I consider like this various element and thinks, that for a rational solution the unit of the spouse must restrict succession by representation, thinks that must reform a civil law.
Abstract
The ground which recognizes a succession by representation is right in ideology of equity, is in order to correspond even in ground of the modern succession which is a life guarantee of the successor. The succession by representation includes the continent legal system nation and american legal system nation and is recognizing from all countries. Our country the succession by representation from the Joseon Dynasty period after that there is a possibility of seeking. Like this succession by representation about civil law provision from when establishing until currently that provision so is simple. The contents also the interpretation of the part which is various interpretation possibility and call of condolence between is not clearly. According to Korean civil law, Article 1001 (Inheritance by Representation) where a lineal descendant or a brother or sister who would become an inheritor in accordance with the provisions of Article 1000 (1) 1 and 3, has died, or has become disqualified before the commencement of succession, his or her lineal descendants, if any exist, shall become inheritors in the order in which the deceased or disqualified person would have become the inheritor, Article 1003 (Order of Inheritance of Spouse) (2) In the case mentioned in Article 1001, the spouse of the deceased or the disqualified person, before the commencement of inheritance, becomes a co-inheritor in the same order as the inheritors provided in the same Article. If there exists no inheritor, the spouse becomes the sole inheritor. Like this the situation and the unit where the occurrence possibility of succession increases about succession by representation is caused by with provision interpretation coat various problem point and even until currently is a field where the possession of criticism is many. The problem of succession by representation is thought one in the system where the legal sentiment of law affection and the common person collides. The family of actuality from form of the large family changes in the extended family and small family is going. Like this tendency with the fact that will be magnified. I consider like this various element and thinks, that for a rational solution the unit of the spouse must restrict succession by representation, thinks that must reform a civil law.
참고문헌 (53)
- 곽윤직, "상속법(개정판)" (2004), 박영사
- 김용한, "신친족상속법론" (2002), 박영사
- 김주수, "주석민법(상속1)" (2002), 한국사법행정학회
- 김주수, "친족ㆍ상속법(제8판)" (2006), 법문사
- 박동섭, "친족상속법(3정판)" (2009), 박영사
- 박병호, "가족법" (1993), 한국방송통신대학출판부
- 배경숙, "친족상속법강의" (2000), 제일법규
- 신영호, "공동상속론" (1987), 나남
- 오시영, "친족상속법" (2006), 학현사
- 이경희, "가족법(4정판)" (2004), 법원사
- 임정평, "한국친족상속법" (1982), 단대출판부
- 조승현, "친족ㆍ상속법" (2009), 신조사
- 한봉희, "가족법" (2007), 푸른세상
- 곽동헌, "대습상속", 아세아여성법학, (6) (2003), 아세아여성법학연구소
- 권순한, "상속법의 미래의 과제", 가족법연구, (14) (2000), 한국가족법학회
- 김기영, "대습상속원인으로서의 동시사망의 추정", 연세법학연구, 7(1)통권 : 9 (2000), 연세대학교 법과대학 법률문제연구소
- 김용호, "동시사망과 대습상속－대법원 2001. 3. 9 선고 99다13157 판결을 중심으로－", 법학논총, 26 (2002), 단국대학교 법학연구소
- 김은아, "被代襲者의 配偶者의 代襲相續에 관한 硏究", 법학연구, (26), pp.189~207 (2007), 한국법학회
- 김준원, "대습상속의 문제점과 개선방향", 사법행정, 40(11)통권 : 467 (1999), 한국사법행정학회
- 김준원, "배우자의 대습상속에 관한 개선방안의 법적 고찰. in: 민사법의 실천적과제(한도정환담교수화갑기념논문집)" (2000), 법문사
- 남효순, "프랑스상속법에서의 혈족상속－계통상속 및 대습상속－", 서울대학교법학, 38(3)통권 : 105 (1997), 서울대학교법학연구소
- 박병호, "상속결격의 제문제. in: 가족법논집" (1996), 도서출판 진원
- 박병호, "상속결격의 제문제. in: 현대민법의 과제와 전망(남송한봉희박사화갑기념논문집)" (1994), 밀알
- 신영호, "상속순위와 상속분", 가족법연구, (4) (1990), 한국가족법학회
- 신영호, "피대습자의 배우자의 대습상속. in: 가족법의 변동요인과 현상" (1998), 세창출판사
- 신영호, "피상속인에 대한 상속인의 부양과 상속과의 관계", 가정법원사건의 제문제 하, 102 (2003), 법원도서관
- 신유철, "21세기 한국민사법학회의 과제", 안암법학, (13) (2001), 도서출판 고려
- 안영문, "대습상속에 관한 몇 가지 문제점", 부산법조, (15) (1997), 부산지방변호사회
- 안영하, "기여분과 대습상속인의 상속분", 성균관법학, 20(2), pp.57~83 (2008), 법학연구소
- 안영하, "대습상속에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 안영하, "대습상속에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2000
- 안영하, "대습원인으로서서의 상속포기에 관한 입법론적 고찰", 성균관법학, 17(1), pp.351~372 (2005), 법학연구소
- 안영하, "일본의 대습상속제도의 비교법적 검토", 성균관법학, 17(3), pp.207~252 (2005), 법학연구소
- 안영하, "피대습자의 배우자의 대습상속에 관한 입법론적 검토", 성균관법학, 18(2), pp.233~276 (2006), 법학연구소
- 이승우, "대습상속소고", 아세아여성법학, (7) (2004), 아세아여성법학연구소
- 이영무, "선순위상속인들이 포기하였을 경우 상속재산이 차순위상속인에게 귀속되는지 여부", 인권과 정의, 통권 : 239 (1996), 대한변호사협회
- 이영환, "대습상속에 관한 연구－인천 제일상호신용금고 회장의 재산상속문제를 중심으로", 육군제삼사관학교 논문집, 47 (1998), 육군제3사관학교
- 이은정, "법정상속인에 대한 재검토", 가족법연구, 18(2), pp.225~258 (2004), 한국가족법학회
- 이정향, "대습상속 소고", 사회과학논총, 4 (2005), 대구가톨릭대학교 사회과학연구소
- 이해일, "동시사망의 추정과 대습상속권에 관한 연구", 경주대학교 논문집, 10 (1998), 경주대학교
- 이해일, "동시사망의 추정과 배우자의 대습상속권", 고시계, (496) (1998), 국가고시학회
- 정구태, "대습상속에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2003
- 정긍식, "배우자의 대습상속권", 민사판례연구, 25 (2003), 박영사
- 최금숙, "현행민법상 상속인규정에 대한 재검토", 가족법연구, 18(1), pp.75~126 (2004), 한국가족법학회
- 최성경, "동시사망추정과 배우자 대습상속 -대법원 2001. 3. 9.선고 99다13157판결-", 가족법연구, 19(1), pp.441~471 (2005), 한국가족법학회
- 황근수, "상속법상 대습상속에 관한 법리적 고찰", 민사법연구, 15(2) (2007), 대한민사법학회
- 久保木康晴, "(最新)家族法" (1989), 芦書房
- 內田貴, "民法Ⅳ(親族ㆍ相續)" (2002), 東京大學出版會
- 島津一郞, "(新)判例コンメンタ－ル 民法14(相續 1)" (1992), 三省堂
- 鈴木祿彌, "相續法講義" (1996), 創文社
- 中川高男, "親族ㆍ相續法要說(法學要說シリ－ズ)" (1991), 靑林書院
- 中川善之助, "註釋民法(24)" (1968), 有斐閣
- 中川善之助, "新版 註釋民法(26)相續(1)" (1992), 有斐閣