한정승인의 심판절차와 상속채무의 배당변제에 관한 고찰
A Study on the Judging Procedure of the Limited Approval and the Allotted Repayment of the Inherited Debt
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The current civil law specifies one’s responsibility based on the registration and acceptance of the limited approval and the range of the related effect. Moreover, it mentions the settlement method of the inherited properties based on the acceptance of the limited approval. However, Article 1030 of the Civil Law, which specifies the registration method of the limited approval, shows problems regarding the completion of the list of inherited properties, while Article 1038 or Article 1038 of the Civil Law, which specifies the repayment method of the inherited debt, contains the danger of converting the limited acceptance into a simple kind of acceptance due to the mutual interruption of the related legal regulations. It can be said that such a state has become worsened as the family court focuses on the process of accepting the limited acceptance, while providing the person with a limited approval with the burden related to the follow-up procedure in regard to the debt-repaying process towards the inherited creditor. As a result, not only the general public but also the experts involved in the related field are now regarding the limited approval system as the one requiring a lot of effort in order for anyone to be exempted from the responsibility related to the compensation for damages. Also, the rate of using such a system seems to be very low. Therefore, this study focuses on the appropriate acceptance procedure for the limited acceptance. Also, it looks at the process related to the allotted repayment of the inherited debt, which is carried out by the person with a limited approval following the acceptance procedure, suggesting various brief methods for the improvement of a few problems.
Abstract
The current civil law specifies one’s responsibility based on the registration and acceptance of the limited approval and the range of the related effect. Moreover, it mentions the settlement method of the inherited properties based on the acceptance of the limited approval. However, Article 1030 of the Civil Law, which specifies the registration method of the limited approval, shows problems regarding the completion of the list of inherited properties, while Article 1038 or Article 1038 of the Civil Law, which specifies the repayment method of the inherited debt, contains the danger of converting the limited acceptance into a simple kind of acceptance due to the mutual interruption of the related legal regulations. It can be said that such a state has become worsened as the family court focuses on the process of accepting the limited acceptance, while providing the person with a limited approval with the burden related to the follow-up procedure in regard to the debt-repaying process towards the inherited creditor. As a result, not only the general public but also the experts involved in the related field are now regarding the limited approval system as the one requiring a lot of effort in order for anyone to be exempted from the responsibility related to the compensation for damages. Also, the rate of using such a system seems to be very low. Therefore, this study focuses on the appropriate acceptance procedure for the limited acceptance. Also, it looks at the process related to the allotted repayment of the inherited debt, which is carried out by the person with a limited approval following the acceptance procedure, suggesting various brief methods for the improvement of a few problems.
참고문헌 (29)
- 고형규, "특별대리인 및 재산관리인의 선임", 재판자료, (18) (1983), 법원행정처
- 곽윤직, "상속법" (2004)
- 권순한, "친족․상속법" (2010), 도서출판 fides
- 김성수, "자의 공유재산의 담보제공과 이해상반행위 : 대법원 2002.1.11 선고 2001다65960판결(공2002.473)", 가족법연구, 17(2), pp.3~122 (2003), 한국가족법학회
- 김주수, "주석민법 상속(2)" (2005), 한국사법행정학회
- 김주수, "친족․상속법" (1997), 법문사
- 김주수, "친족․상속법" (2011), 법문사
- 박광천, "상속의 한정승인", 상속법의 제문제, (78) (1998), 법원도서관
- 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2009), 박영사
- 박병호, "가족법" (1994), 한국방송통신대학교출판부
- 배경숙, "친족상속법강의" (2006), 제일법규
- 법원실무제요 민사집행(I)—집행총론—, "법원행정처", ~ (2003)
- 법원실무제요 민사집행법(Ⅱ) 부동산집행, "법원행정처", ~ (2003)
- 서인겸, "채무를 상속한 의사무능력자 및 그의 상속인 보호에 관한 고찰 －서울중앙지방법원 2010.10.26. 선고 2010나7033 판결(확정)을 중심으로－", 가족법연구, 25(1), pp.29~54 (2011), 한국가족법학회
- 손지열, "민법 제1019조 1항의 고려기간의 기산점", 민사판례연구, (10) (1988), 민사판례연구회
- 손흥수, "근저당부 채권의 양도와 집행에 관한 이의-근저당권부 채권이 양도되었으나 근저당권 이전등기가 경료 되지 않은 상태에서 실시된 배당절차에 대하여 근저당권 명의인이나 채권양수인이 배당금이 채권양수인에게 배당되어야 한다는 이유로 집행에 관한 이의를 할 수 있는지 여부", 법조, 57(11), pp.241~289 (2008), 법조협회
- 송덕수, "신민법강의" (2010), 박영사
- 송효진, "상속의 승인과 포기에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2009
- 윤진수, "상속채무를 뒤늦게 발견한 상속인의 보호", 서울대학교 법학 (1997), 서울대학교 법 학연구소
- 이상원, "상속포기와 한정승인에 있어 신고기간(고려기간)의 기산점 가정법원사건의 제 문제(하)", 재판자료, 102 (2003), 법원도서관
- 이혜진, "상속의 한정승인의 요건과 효력정 이후 개정부칙과의 관계를 중심으로", 법과사회, (31), pp.251~277 (2006), 법과사회이론학회
- 이화숙, "채무초과 상속재산에 대한 채권자의 권리와 상속인 보호", 비교사법, 4(1) (1997), 내동 우홍구박사 화 갑기념
- 임영수, "부동산임차권의 승계에 따른 사실혼배우자의 주거권 보호", 중앙법학, 12(4), pp.61~83 (2010), 중앙법학회
- 지원림, "민법강의" (2011), 홍문사
- 최성경, "상속포기와 고려기간의 기산점- 대법원 2005. 7. 22. 선고 2003다43681 판결", 법조, 55(12), pp.291~341 (2006), 법조협회
- 허부열, "상속의 한정승인에 있어서 상속재산이 없거나 그 상속재산이 상속채무의 변제에 부족한 경우 상속채무 전부에 대한 이행판결을 선고하여야 하는지 여부 (적극),”", 대법원판례해설, (46) (2004), 법원도서관
- 谷口知平, "新版註釋民法(27)—相續(2)" (1994), 有斐閣
- 菅原郁夫, "抗告と抗告審の審理 in 民事訴訟法の爭點(第3版) ジュﾘスト增刊" (1998), 有斐閣
- 林良平, "注解 判例民法4(親族法․相續法)" (1992), 靑林書院