본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

성과 본의 변경에 따른 소속 종중의 변경 여부에 관한 소고

Study on Change of Belonging of Clan Reunion According to the Change of Surname and Clan Seat

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

So far, Korea has been enforcing principle of invariable surname embodied in its civil law, based on the patrilineal doctrine. However, Korea broadly allows change of surname and clan seat since 2008. As to the ‘clan reunion’, conventional judicial precedent defined it as a spontaneously generated clan group consisting of male members above adult age among descendents of common progenitor. However, it is changed to mean the descendents who share surname and clan seat with common progenitor, once they reach adult age, regardless their sexuality, according to the judgement of collegiate court. This paper deals with the influence on the members of clan reunion which is based on the surname and clan seat of common progenitor, in case there is a change in surname and clan seat of the children. It becomes discussible if the change of clan reunion is allowed for those whose surname and clan seat is changed. In case of clan reunion which has large fortune, from now on, its members might be increased possibly by changing their surname and clan seat to those of their mother, or according to the adoption. On the other hand, in case of change of surname and clan seat following the farther-in-law, there might be the case in which the belonging of clan reunion becomes ambiguous. So, it would be necessary to solve the problem of whether the change of belonging of clan reunion would be allowed or not, by legislation or precedent. Considering the reality in which changes of surname and clan seat happen frequently for the sake of children’s welfare, the necessity will grow to discuss on the range of membership of clan reunion.

Abstract

So far, Korea has been enforcing principle of invariable surname embodied in its civil law, based on the patrilineal doctrine. However, Korea broadly allows change of surname and clan seat since 2008. As to the ‘clan reunion’, conventional judicial precedent defined it as a spontaneously generated clan group consisting of male members above adult age among descendents of common progenitor. However, it is changed to mean the descendents who share surname and clan seat with common progenitor, once they reach adult age, regardless their sexuality, according to the judgement of collegiate court. This paper deals with the influence on the members of clan reunion which is based on the surname and clan seat of common progenitor, in case there is a change in surname and clan seat of the children. It becomes discussible if the change of clan reunion is allowed for those whose surname and clan seat is changed. In case of clan reunion which has large fortune, from now on, its members might be increased possibly by changing their surname and clan seat to those of their mother, or according to the adoption. On the other hand, in case of change of surname and clan seat following the farther-in-law, there might be the case in which the belonging of clan reunion becomes ambiguous. So, it would be necessary to solve the problem of whether the change of belonging of clan reunion would be allowed or not, by legislation or precedent. Considering the reality in which changes of surname and clan seat happen frequently for the sake of children’s welfare, the necessity will grow to discuss on the range of membership of clan reunion.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 권용우, "가족법 개정과 성불변의 원칙", 법조, 24(6) (1975), 법조협회
  2. 김상용, "변화하는 사회와 가족법(II)", 법학연구, 43(1) (2002), 부산대학교
  3. 김상용, "친양자제도의 도입 필요성", 고시연구, 29(3) (2002), 고시연구사
  4. 김영규, "우리 민법상 부성주의", 법학연구, (25), pp.165~184 (2007), 한국법학회
  5. 김재형, "단체로서의 종중", 한국법과 세계화: 2005 국제심포지움 (2005), 서울대학교 BK 법학연구단
  6. 김제완, "단체법리의 재조명 : 종중재산의 법적 성격", 인권과 정의, (355), pp.134~159 (2006), 대한변호사협회
  7. 김주수, "친족상속법" (2009), 법문사
  8. 문영화, "21세기 사법의 전개: 송민최종영대법원장재임기념 in 종중의 자격을 성년남자로 제한하는 종래 관습법의 효력" (2005), 박영사
  9. 배병일, "대법원 판례에서의 유사 종중", 가족법연구, 20(2), pp.233~262 (2006), 한국가족법학회
  10. 윤진수, "2006년도 주요 민법 관련 판례 회고", 서울대학교 법학, 48(1), pp.371~449 (2007), 법학연구소
  11. 윤진수, "變化하는 사회와 宗中에 관한 慣習", 사법, 1(1), pp.3~36 (2007), 사법발전재단
  12. 윤진수, "女性差別撤廢協約과 韓國家族法", 서울대학교 법학, 46(3), pp.76~107 (2005), 법학연구소
  13. 윤진수, "傳統的 家族制度와 憲法― 최근의 憲法裁判所 判例를 중심으로 ―", 서울대학교 법학, 47(2), pp.149~188 (2006), 법학연구소
  14. 이우석, "종중의 ‘자연발생적 단체설’에 대한 소고", 재산법연구, 24(1), pp.29~57 (2007), 한국재산법학회
  15. 이유정, "부성승계 및 성불변 원칙의 문제점", 민주사회를 위한 변론, (55) (2003), 민주사회를 위한 변호사모임
  16. 이은정, "재판자료: 가정법원사건의 제문제 in: 성의 변경 ― 친자관계를 중심으로 ―" (2003), 법원도서관
  17. 임정평, "현대민법론: 설암이광신박사화갑기념 in: 성불변의 원칙에 대한 소고" (1982), 고시원
  18. 차선자, "종중에 대한 고찰- 단체법과 여성주의적 시각에서 -", 인권과 정의, (371), pp.81~95 (2007), 대한변호사협회
  19. 한삼인, "宗中에 관한 判例分析", 인권과 정의, (369), pp.147~169 (2007), 대한변호사협회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)