본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

개정민법상 임의후견제도의 쟁점과 과제

The issues on the new continuing power of attorney system in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

30

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The new adult guardianship system including a continuing power of attorney(CPA) system will be in force 1. July, 2013 in South Korea. The aim of this paper is to discuss the practical issues in the CPA system. The CPA system is a system for notarized concluding a CPA contract, while the principal still has the mental capacity to make a decision for concluding the contract, providing a mandatory with powers of representation and decision-making of personal affairs, especially the consent to medical treatments and for guardian works(works concerning management of estate and personal affairs—medical treatments and cares). It aims to prepare for a time when the capacity to make a decision of the principal has become insufficient and when it is actually insufficient. The CPA may begin with the supervision by supervisor of a continuing power of attorney, who may be appointed by the Family Court. As notarizing concluding of a CPA contract, notaries may have an interview in person to determine whether the principal has the mental capacity to make the decision about the contract and the intention to enter into the contract. It is important issues to note in this paper, what is the test to determine the mental capacity of principal for concluding CPA contract, whether can concluding of CPA contract be represented by parents or guardians, How supervising a CPA guardian to prevent from his/her fraudulent acts, whether a CPA guardian must get the permission of Family Court as consent of the fatal medical treatment. There are necessities for the legislation of the Registration of guardianship Act and the revisions in the Notary Public Act and the Family Litigation Act, etc. before the CPA system enters into force.

Abstract

The new adult guardianship system including a continuing power of attorney(CPA) system will be in force 1. July, 2013 in South Korea. The aim of this paper is to discuss the practical issues in the CPA system. The CPA system is a system for notarized concluding a CPA contract, while the principal still has the mental capacity to make a decision for concluding the contract, providing a mandatory with powers of representation and decision-making of personal affairs, especially the consent to medical treatments and for guardian works(works concerning management of estate and personal affairs—medical treatments and cares). It aims to prepare for a time when the capacity to make a decision of the principal has become insufficient and when it is actually insufficient. The CPA may begin with the supervision by supervisor of a continuing power of attorney, who may be appointed by the Family Court. As notarizing concluding of a CPA contract, notaries may have an interview in person to determine whether the principal has the mental capacity to make the decision about the contract and the intention to enter into the contract. It is important issues to note in this paper, what is the test to determine the mental capacity of principal for concluding CPA contract, whether can concluding of CPA contract be represented by parents or guardians, How supervising a CPA guardian to prevent from his/her fraudulent acts, whether a CPA guardian must get the permission of Family Court as consent of the fatal medical treatment. There are necessities for the legislation of the Registration of guardianship Act and the revisions in the Notary Public Act and the Family Litigation Act, etc. before the CPA system enters into force.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 구상엽, "개정민법상 성년후견제도에 대한 연구 : 입법배경, 입법자의 의사 및 향후 과제를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2012
  2. 김형석, "민법 개정안에 따른 성년후견법제", 가족법연구, 24(2), pp.111~166 (2010), 한국가족법학회
  3. 박인환, "새로운 성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안의 검토", 가족법연구, 24(1), pp.31~74 (2010), 한국가족법학회
  4. 백승흠, "성년후견제도의 입법방향", 민사법학, (18), pp.156~ (2000)
  5. 백승흠, "현행 성년자보호를 위한 제도의 문제점과 대안으로서의 성년후견제도", 민사법학, (24) (2003), 한국민사법학회
  6. "성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안 공청회 자료집", 법무부, ~ (2009)
  7. 성년후견제도 연구, "성년후견제도연구회", 사법연구재단, ~ (2007)
  8. 신영호, "고령사회에 있어서의 후견제도", 가족법연구, (11), pp.366~ (1997)
  9. 이재경, "환자의 사전의료지시서에 관한 비교법적 연구 - 독일법을 중심으로 -", 비교사법, 18(3), pp.845~876 (2011), 한국비교사법학회
  10. 제철웅, "성년후견제도의 개정방향", 민사법학, (42), pp.111~149 (2008), 한국민사법학회
  11. 제철웅, "영국법에서 의사결정무능력 성인의 보호제도의 역사적 전개와 2005년의 정신능력법의 특징", 비교사법, 17(4), pp.215~278 (2010), 한국비교사법학회
  12. 제철웅, "요보호성인의 인권존중의 관점에서 본 새로운 성년후견제도: 그 특징, 문제점 그리고 개선방안", 민사법학, 56, pp.277~331 (2011), 한국민사법학회
  13. 제철웅, "성년후견제도의 도입논의와 영국의 정신능력법의 시사점", 가족법연구, 21(3), pp.275~310 (2007), 한국가족법학회
  14. 현소혜, "의료행위 동의권자의 결정 - 성년후견제 시행에 대비하여 -", 홍익법학, 13(2), pp.177~213 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
  15. 二宮周平, "家族法" (2009), 新世社
  16. 佐久間毅, "民法の基礎 1" (2009), 有斐閣
  17. 新井誠, "成年後見制度" (2009), 有斐閣
  18. 小林昭彦, "新成年後見制度の解說" (2000), 金融財政事情硏究會
  19. "任意後見實務マニュアル, 社團法人 成年後見センターリーガルサポート, 新日本法規", ~ (2008)
  20. 最高裁判所事務總局家政局, "成年後見關係事件の槪況 ― 平成 20年1月~12月―", ~
  21. 岡部 喜代子, "日本における成年後見制度の問題点", 한림법학 FORUM, 20 (2009)
  22. 岡孝, "日本任意後見法의 槪要와 問題點", 한림법학 FORUM, (21) (2010)
  23. 須永, "成年後見制度의 解釋運用과 立法的課題, 成年後見法硏究 제2호", ~
  24. 多田宏治, "日本任意後見制度の現狀と課題", 學習院大學 東洋文化硏究所 東アジア比較民法硏究會 (2009), 學習院大學 東洋文化硏究所
  25. "任意後見制度に関する改善提言"[URL]
  26. "任意後見制度の改善提言と司法書士の任意後見執務に対する提案"[URL]
  27. 成年後見問題硏究會報告書, "成年後見問題硏究會", 金融財政事情硏究會, ~ (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)