본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선시대 이후 한국의 이혼제도에 대한 일고찰 —이혼원인과 양성평등을 중심으로—

A Study on the divorce System of Korea After Chosun Dynasty —Focusing Mainly on the Causes of the Divorce and Gender Equality—

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

A Wife in the Chosun Dynasty Yang-Ban(兩班) Society doesn't have the right of divorce claim and is unilaterally forced to be dutiful to husband's parents and faithful to her husband on the grounds of Daemyeongryul(大明律) and Confucian Culture. Through the customs produced by Japan, the introduction of civil code in Japan and the change of customs in Chosun during the Japanese colonial period, a divorce system by agreement is introduced and the judicial divorce system is also adopted though unequal, a wife has the right of divorce claim to a husband or a state with abuse, insult and adultery. By the introduction of Korean civil code, that regulates the same right of divorce claim with the same causes in gender equality, the liberty of divorce is guaranteed equally in gender equality. Although the same right of divorce claim in gender equality doesn't function equally in quality because of the gender inequality in marriage and childcare system, the culture that tolerates concubinage, and the economical inequality between men and women as revisions of family law shows, the traditional divorce by husbands because of wives' adultery and disobedience to parents reduces considerably. The voice of having to shifting from liability divorce system to no-fault divorce system is often heard because women are not any more victims and the weak because of the improvement of the women's state. But considering that women are still the weak because economic activity rates of women is below 50% and the main causes of the judicial divorce are assault and adultery, the same divorce claim between women and men doesn't function samely in many respects.

Abstract

A Wife in the Chosun Dynasty Yang-Ban(兩班) Society doesn't have the right of divorce claim and is unilaterally forced to be dutiful to husband's parents and faithful to her husband on the grounds of Daemyeongryul(大明律) and Confucian Culture. Through the customs produced by Japan, the introduction of civil code in Japan and the change of customs in Chosun during the Japanese colonial period, a divorce system by agreement is introduced and the judicial divorce system is also adopted though unequal, a wife has the right of divorce claim to a husband or a state with abuse, insult and adultery. By the introduction of Korean civil code, that regulates the same right of divorce claim with the same causes in gender equality, the liberty of divorce is guaranteed equally in gender equality. Although the same right of divorce claim in gender equality doesn't function equally in quality because of the gender inequality in marriage and childcare system, the culture that tolerates concubinage, and the economical inequality between men and women as revisions of family law shows, the traditional divorce by husbands because of wives' adultery and disobedience to parents reduces considerably. The voice of having to shifting from liability divorce system to no-fault divorce system is often heard because women are not any more victims and the weak because of the improvement of the women's state. But considering that women are still the weak because economic activity rates of women is below 50% and the main causes of the judicial divorce are assault and adultery, the same divorce claim between women and men doesn't function samely in many respects.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 강영민, "기상천외 조선사" (2010), 이가출판사
  2. 김상용, "이혼법의 역사적 전개", 法學論文集, 31(1), pp.131~160 (2007), 법학연구원
  3. 풍속을 해하는 죄의 양형인자에 관한 분석: 특히 간통죄를 중심으로, 재판자료 8집(81.3.): 민사손해배상산정․형사양형기준의 조사분석(2), "김상욱", 대법원 법원행정처, ~ (1981)
  4. 김인옥, "한국의 혼인문화" (2011), 도서출판 구상
  5. 대법원 법원행정처, "사법연감 1976~2012" (1976)
  6. 대법원 법원행정처, "재판자료 제29집: 친족상속에 관한 구관습" (1985)
  7. 박병호, "일제하의 가족정책과 관습법 형성과정", 법학, 33(2)통권 : 90 (1992), 서울대학교 법학연구소
  8. 소현숙, "식민지시기 근대적 이혼제도와 여성의 대응", 박사, 사학과 한국사전공, pp.2013
  9. 제․개정 이유,
  10. 박주, "병자호란과 이혼", 조선사연구, 10 (2001), 조선사연구회
  11. 양현아, "한국가족법 읽기 - 전통, 식민지성, 젠더의 교차로에서" (2011), 창비출판
  12. 이선미, "유책배우자의 이혼청구 : 현황 및 입법론을 중심으로", 석사, 법학, pp.2010
  13. 이승일, "일제 시대 친족관습의 변화와 조선민사령 개정에 관한 연구: 조선민사령 제11조제2차 개정안을 중심으로", 동아시아 문화연구, 33 (1999), 한양대학교 한국학연구소
  14. 이승일, "조선총독부의 법제정책에 대한 연구: 조선민사령 제11조 '관습'의 성문법화를 중심으로", 박사, 사학, pp.2003
  15. 이태영, "외국과 비교해 본 한국의 이혼", YWCA 월간, 17(04) (1969), 대한YWCA연합회
  16. 이화숙, "이혼원인의 변천과 여성(처)의 사회경제적 지위의 상관관계", 젠더법학, 2(1)통권 : 3 (2010)
  17. 장병인, "조선전기 혼인제와 성차별" (1997), 일지사
  18. 정해은, "조선후기 이혼의 실상과 <대명률>의 적용", 역사와 현실, (75), pp.93~125 (2010), 한국역사연구회
  19. 정해은, "조선의 여성, 역사가 다시 말하다" (2011), 너머북스
  20. 민현주, "지표를 통해 본 한국여성 삶의 변화", 건국 60주년 기념 학술 심포지엄―한국 여성 삶의 변화와 미래 아젠다― (2008), 한국여성정책연구원
  21. 한삼인, "이혼에 관한 연구 1: 이혼법의 변천․내용․문제점", 논문집, 19 (1984), 제주대학교
  22. 황영택, "기상천외한 조선왕조실록2" (2011), 김&정
  23. 제134. 이혼에 관한 관습은 어떠한가, "安藤靜", 중추원, ~, pp.隆熙三年 韓國慣習調査報告書
  24. 제134. 이혼에 관한 관습은 어떠한가, "下森久吉", 法典調査局, 중추원, ~
  25. "국사편찬위원회 한국사데이터베이스"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)