다양한 가족 유형의 확산에 따른 「민법」의 개선 과제 검토
A Study on the Improvement of Civil Law due to the Spread of Various Family Types
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective indicators such as the Statistics Korea and the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family already show that our society is changing from a typical family form to a variety of forms, and that people’s social acceptance of various families has increased. This is the result of a change in the individual’s family values in the way the family is organized, and therefore the choice of the individual has been expanded. The coexistence of these various family types means that even in law and policy, only certain types of family cannot be recognized and targeted. In line with the changes, the government is pushing for policies to embrace various family types through the “Basic Plan for Ageing Society and Population Policy” and “Basic Plan for Healthy Families”. Related private studies call for the deletion of Article 779 on the scope of families under civil law. In this regard, we observed that the deletion of Article 779 of the Civil Law is not a direct solution to the problem through Acts stipulating family and similar terms including Article 779 of the Civil Act and cases of various family types. However, considering that the Family in Civil law based on marriage and blood ties is not a major household, and that there are already various types of families appearing in our society, the prejudice in perception of them will continue to be maintained if Article 779 of the Civil law is not deleted, and the deletion of regulations on the scope of families alone will contribute greatly to the paradigm shift in family types, I propose the deletion of Article 779 of the Civil Law. The concept of a family including various combinations is to have its definition in the Framework Act on Healthy Families, the basic law of family policy. In addition, it is proposed to improve family-related regulations and terms, and to prepare laws for various combined relationships and introduce an inheritance rights exclusion system.
Abstract
Objective indicators such as the Statistics Korea and the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family already show that our society is changing from a typical family form to a variety of forms, and that people’s social acceptance of various families has increased. This is the result of a change in the individual’s family values in the way the family is organized, and therefore the choice of the individual has been expanded. The coexistence of these various family types means that even in law and policy, only certain types of family cannot be recognized and targeted. In line with the changes, the government is pushing for policies to embrace various family types through the “Basic Plan for Ageing Society and Population Policy” and “Basic Plan for Healthy Families”. Related private studies call for the deletion of Article 779 on the scope of families under civil law. In this regard, we observed that the deletion of Article 779 of the Civil Law is not a direct solution to the problem through Acts stipulating family and similar terms including Article 779 of the Civil Act and cases of various family types. However, considering that the Family in Civil law based on marriage and blood ties is not a major household, and that there are already various types of families appearing in our society, the prejudice in perception of them will continue to be maintained if Article 779 of the Civil law is not deleted, and the deletion of regulations on the scope of families alone will contribute greatly to the paradigm shift in family types, I propose the deletion of Article 779 of the Civil Law. The concept of a family including various combinations is to have its definition in the Framework Act on Healthy Families, the basic law of family policy. In addition, it is proposed to improve family-related regulations and terms, and to prepare laws for various combined relationships and introduce an inheritance rights exclusion system.
참고문헌 (36)
- 법무부 민법개정자료발간팀, "민법개정총서 1 2013년 개정민법자료집 上" (2013), 법무부
- 가족관계의 등록 등에 관한 법률 시행 5년-평가 및 개선방안-, "송효진", 한국여성정책연구원, ~ (2013)
- 윤진수, "민법개정총서 5 2013년 개정민법해설", 법무부, ~ (2013)
- 김성우, "성년후견제도의 현황과 과제", 가족법연구, 30(3), pp.407~454 (2016), 한국가족법학회
- 김용화, "가족에 대한 법적·사회적 개념의 통합 필요성", 가족법연구, 22(2), pp.1~28 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- 김은아, "재혼가족의 친족법적 과제", 가족법연구, 24(3), pp.75~98 (2010), 한국가족법학회
- 문흥안, "가족관계등록법의 문제점 및 그 개선방안 -신분등록제도의 개편을 중심으로-", 법학논총, 20(1), pp.301~335 (2013), 법학연구원
- 손현경, "민법상의 친족 및 가족에 대한 입법론적 고찰 ―친족법에서 가족법으로의 전환을 위한 입법론을 중심으로 ―", 가족법연구, 25(3), pp.1~36 (2011), 한국가족법학회
- 이경희, "다문화가족지원법의 문제점과 개선방향 - 다문화가족의 정의 및 범위를 중심으로 -", 법학논고, (32), pp.509~536 (2010), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 이은정, "가족의 범위", 가족법연구, 20(1), pp.1~28 (2006), 한국가족법학회
- 전경근, "다문화가족지원법제의 현황과 개선방안", 저스티스, 146(2), pp.293~314 (2015), 한국법학원
- 정구태, "통일 후 남북한 친족법의 통합방안", 법학논집, 24(2), pp.41~65 (2019), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 정현수, "가족관계의 등록 등에 관한 법률의 제문제", 경희법학, 42(2), pp.593~623 (2007), 법학연구소
- 차선자, "건강가정기본법에 대한 고찰", 가족법연구, 18(2), pp.379~400 (2004), 한국가족법학회
- 교육부, "학교운영위원회 길잡이", ~ (2016)
- "국가인권위원회 결정례, 가족상황을 이유로 한 피부양자 등재 차별, 2014.7.30", ~ (2014)
- "국가인권위원회 결정례, 건강보험 피부양자 등재시 재혼가정 차별, 2014.11.28", ~
- 국가인권위원회, "국민건강보험 피부양자 등재 시 이혼자와 사별자를 구별하는것은 차별", 국가인권위원회 보도자료, 2014.9.30, ~ (2014)
- 국가인권위원회, "국민건강보험 피부양자 부양요건 개정 권고 ”불수용“ 공표", 보도자료 2015.4.2., ~ (2015)
- 국세법령정보시스템, "상속세 및 증여세 집행기준", ~ (2018)
- 김상희, "미혼모 법적 지위 개선을 위한 민법 개정토론회", ~ (2018)
- 대한민국정부, "2019년도 시행계획, 제3차 저출산·고령사회 기본계획", ~
- 2019 가족다양성에 대한 국민 여론조사(결과보고서), "문화체육관광부", ~ (2019)
- "민주노총 규약·규정집", 전국민주노동조합총연맹, ~ (2019)
- 상속권 상실 청구 제도에 대한 국민인식 여론조사 결과 보고서, "법무부", 한국리서치, ~ (2019)
- 법원행정처, "2015~2019 사법연감" (2015)
- 보건복지부, "사실상 혼인관계 부부도 난임치료시술 가능해진다―10월 24일부터 난임치료시술(보조생식술) 건강보험 적용 및 시술비 지원사업 대상 사실혼 부부까지 확대", 보건복지부 보도자료 2019.10.7., ~ (2019)
- 서울대학교 학부모정책연구센터, "2013", 2016 학교운영위원회 길잡이 대조표, 2016
- 진선미, "새로운 가족, 제도의 모색 ｢생활동반자에 관한법률｣토론회", 대한민국 국회, ~ (2014)
- 통계청, "2018 인구주택총조사<등록센서스 방식 집계결과>", 보도자료, 2019.8.29., ~ (2019)
- 행정안전부, "재혼가정 자녀, 동거인에서 ‘배우자의 자녀’로 바뀝니다", 보도자료, 2016.7.26., ~ (2016)
- 남인순, "건강가정기본법 전부개정법률안, 의안번호 2017299, 제안일자 2018-12-07", ~
- ｢건강가정기본법 전부개정법률안｣ 검토보고서, , ~ (2019)
- 박대출, "민법 일부개정법률안, 의안번호 2018974, 제안일자 2019-3-5", ~
- 서영교, "민법 일부개정법률안, 의안번호 2023810, 제안일자 2019-11-14", ~
- 김영호, "장사 등에 관한 법률 일부개정법률안, 의안번호 2024160, 제안일자 2019-12-3", ~