성격병리 평가 도구로서의 PSY-5 척도의 구인타당도
Construct Validity of the MMPI-2 PSY-5 Scale for Assessing Personality Pathology
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 성격장애의 기술을 위해 개발된 MMPI-2 성격병리 5 요인(PSY-5) 척도가 실제로 성격장애를 잘 기술할 수 있는지 확인함으로써 이 척도의 구인 타당도를 검증하기 위해 수행되었다. 대학생 및 일반인들에게 PSY-5 척도와 성격 5 요인 척도(NEO-FFI) 그리고 성격장애 진단검사를 실시하였다. 총 682명의 자료가 분석에 사용되었다. PSY-5 척도가 DSM-IV의 성격장애를 잘 기술해 주는지를 확인하기 위해 이 척도와 성격장애 진단검사간 상관분석과 중다회귀분석을 한 결과 성격장애 군집 및 개별 성격장애들과 기대되는 방향으로 유의미한 상관을 보였으며, PSY-5 척도는 10개 성격장애 각각을 유의하게 설명하였다. 다음으로, PSY-5 척도와 NEO-FFI 중 어떤 것이 성격장애를 더 잘 설명하는지 알아보기 위해 두 척도 각각으로 성격장애 점수를 예언할 때의 조정된 R²에 대해 Steiger의 Z검증을 실시한 결과 두 척도가 전반적으로 성격장애를 비슷한 수준으로 설명해 주었다. 다만, 반사회성 성격장애는 PSY-5 척도가, 의존성과 강박성 성격장애는 NEO-FFI 척도가 보다 잘 설명하였다. 본 연구의 결과 PSY-5 척도가 성격 5 요인 척도와 비슷한 정도로 성격병리를 설명할 수 있으며, 성격장애를 평가하는데 유용한 것으로 판단되었다. 본 연구의 결과를 선행연구들에서의 결과와 비교하면서 논의하였다.
Abstract
This study investigated the clinical availability of the MMPI-2 PSY-5 scale, developed to describe personality pathology. For this study normal adults(N=682) including college students completed the PSY-5 scale, the NEO-FFI, and the DTPD(Diagnostic Test of Personality Disorders). The results of correlational and multiple regression analysis showed significant correlations among the PSY-5 scale scores and PDs and clusters of PDs as expected, and also showed that 10 PDs could be significantly explained via the PSY-5 scale. To compare the relative potentialities of the PSY-5 scale and the NEO-FFI to explain PDs, Steiger's z-test to adjusted R square was carried out. The results revealed that the two scales accounted similarly for the variance in PDs, and the PSY-5 scale accounted for more of the variance in antisocial PD symptoms than did the NEO-FFI, while the NEO-FFI scale accounted for more of the variance in dependent PD, and obsessive-compulsive PD symptoms. These results suggest that the PSY-5 scale estimates both normal personalities and personality disorders well as does the FFM. Thus, we concluded that the PSY-5 scale is valid for estimating PDs. We discussed the results of this study compared to those of previous studies.
참고문헌 (38)
- 김중술, "다면적 인적검사 Ⅱ 매뉴얼" (2005), 마음사랑
- 서재삼, "한국형 성격장애 진단검사의 개발과 타당화", 한국심리학회지 임상, 25(1), pp.273~288 (2006), 한국임상심리학회
- 이경임, "한국인의 NEO-PI-R 요인구조와 부적응 집단의 프로파일", 박사, pp.1995
- 황순택, "전형성 평정에 의한 성격장애 진단준거 개발", 박사, pp.1995
- 황순택, "DSM-Ⅳ 성격장애와 성격 5요인 간의 관계", 한국심리학회지 임상, 27(3), pp.777~787 (2008), 한국임상심리학회
- American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder" (1994), Washington: Author
- Bagby, R. M., "Demensional personality traits and the prediction of DSM-IV personality disorder symptom counts in a nonclinical sample", Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, pp.57~67 (2005)
- Bagby, R. M., "Validation of the Dimensional Factor Structure of the Personality Psychopathology Five in Clinical and Nonclinical Samples", Journal of Personality Disorders, 16, pp.304~316 (2002)
- Ben-Porath, Y. S, "Five big issues in clinical personality assessment: are joinder to Costa and McCrae", sychological Assessment, 4, pp.23~25 (1992)
- Byravan, A., "On the incremental validity of MMPI-2 Psychology-5 scales over the revised NEO personality Inventory scales for personality disorders", Psychological Reports, 90, pp.1084~1090 (2002)
- Clark,L.A, "Personality Disorder Diaagnosis: Limitations of the Five-Factor Model", Pychological Inquiry, 4, pp.100~104 (1993)
- Costa, P. T., "Personality disorders and The five factor model of personality", Journal of Personality Disoreder, 4, pp.362~371 (1990)
- Costa, P. T., "Revised NEO Personality Inventory(NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory(NEO-FFI): Professional manual" (1992), Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources
- Digman,J.M, "Five robust trait dimensions: Development, stability, and utility", Journal of Personality, 57, pp.195~214 (1989)
- Egger, J. M., "Cross-cultural replication of the Five-Factor Model and comparison of the NEO-PI-R and MMPI-2 PSY-5 scales in a Dutch psychiatric sample", Psychological assessment, 15(1), pp.81~88 (2003)
- Goldberg,L.R, "The Structure of phenotypic personality traits", American Psychologist, 48, pp.26~34 (1993)
- Gurrea, R. J., "The Five-Factor Model in schizotypal personality disorder", Schizoprenia Research, 80, pp.243~251 (2005)
- Harkness, A. R., "MMPI-2 personality Psychopathology Five scales" (2002), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
- Harkness,A.R, "Phenotypic dimensions of the personality disorders", pp.1989
- Harkness,A.R, "Fundamental topic in the Personality disorders: Candidate trait dimensions from lower region of the hierarch", Psychological assessment, 4(2), pp.251~259 (1992)
- Harkness, A. R., "The personality psychopathology five(PSY-5): Issue from the page of a diagnosis manual instead of a dictionary", pp.291~315 (1994), New York: Springer
- Harkness, A. R., "The personality psychopathology five (PSY-5): Constructs and MMPI-2 Scales", Psychological assessment, 7, pp.104~114 (1995)
- Harkness, A. R., "Personality Psychopathology Five in the Boston VA Normative Aging sample", Paper presented at 103rd annual Meeting of the american Psychological Association, New York, ~
- Hopwood, C. J., "The construct validity of rule-breaking and aggression in an adult clinical sample", Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43, pp.803~808 (2009)
- Martinez,M.T, "A correlational study between the MMPI-2 PSY-5 and the 16PF global factors", pp.2005
- McCrae,R.R, "The five-factor model and its assessment in clinical settings", Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, pp.399~414 (1991)
- Morey, L. C., "The representation of borderline, avoidant, obsessive-compulsive and schizotypal personality disorder by the five-factor model", Journal of personality disorders, 16, pp.215~234 (2002)
- Petroskey, L. J., "Correlates of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2(MMPI-2) Personality Psychopayhology Five(PSY-5) scalea in a forensic assessment setting", Assessment, 10, pp.393~399 (2003)
- Samuel, D. B, "A meta-analytic review of relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR Personality disorders: A facet level analysis", Clinical Psychology Review, 28(8), pp.1326~1342 (2008)
- Saulsman, L. M, "The five-factor model and personality disorder emprical literature: A meta-analytic review", Clinical Psychology Review, 23, pp.1055~1085 (2004)
- Schroder M. L., "Dimension of personality disorder and the five-factor model of personality", pp.149~160 (1994), Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
- Steiger,J.H, "Test for Comparing Elements of a Correlation Matrix", Psychological Bulletin, 87, pp.245~251 (1980)
- Trull,T.J, "DSM-Ⅲ-R personality disorders and The Five Factor Model of personality: An empirical comparison", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 10, pp.553~560 (1992)
- Trull, T. J., "Comparison of the MMPI-2 Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) the NEO-PI, and the NEO-PI-R", Psychological assessment, 7, pp.508~516 (1995)
- Villemarette-Pittman, N. R., "Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder and behavior disinhibition", The Journal of Psychology, 138, pp.5~22 (2004)
- Widiger T. A., "Assessment of the five-factor model of personality", Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, pp.228~250 (1997)
- Wiggins, J. S., "Personality: Structure and assessment", Annual Review of Psychology, 43, pp.473~504 (1992)
- Wygant, D., B., "Incremental Validity Self-Report Scales in Assessing Self-Reported Personality Disorder Criteria", Assessment, 13, pp.178~186 (2006)