출산경력의 불고지와 혼인 취소 사유 ―대법원 2017. 5. 16. 선고 2017므238 판결―
Concealment of Past Childbirth History as a Ground of Marriage Cancellation
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article, the comments on Korea Supreme Court Decision on May 16th 2017, Case No. 2017Meu238, treats the issue on ‘whether concealment of past childbirth history involves fraud sufficient to cancellation of marriage’. In the case, the wife, Vietnamese marriage-immigrant woman, had experienced childbirth in former forced marriage by means of kidnap, rape, and imprisonment at the age of 13, which is not known to her husband. When the marriage was broken up due to the repeated sexual abuse of the father-in-law and the woman filed for divorce, her husband found the past childbirth history of the wife in criminal conviction of her father-in-law, and filed a counteraction for cancellation of marriage arguing that her concealment of past childbirth history constitutes fraud and cancellation of marriage shall be granted on Korean Civil Act article 816(3). Korean Supreme Court had ruled on its decision on February 18th 2016, case No. 2015Meu654, 661 that the concealment of childbirth history, which has been caused by rape on her minority, cannot be regarded as fraud and the woman did not have a duty to inform the history to her husband when marriage. However, in the case, Korean High Court (the original court) which has been remanded the case, granted cancellation of marriage, on the reason that newly investigated facts show that her past childbirth has been caused not by “rape on her minority”, but “her marriage”. This decision was finally affirmed by Korea Supreme Court. This article argues that concealment of past childbirth history itself, whether it was caused by rape on minority or not, shall not be a ground of marriage cancellation, as the past childbirth history cannot be ‘the essential elements of marriage’. This article further argues that the forced marriage by kidnap or rape on minority should not be regarded as “marriage”. Thus this article reaches the conclusion that Korea Supreme Court’s final decision in the case should be criticized and reconsidered.
Abstract
This article, the comments on Korea Supreme Court Decision on May 16th 2017, Case No. 2017Meu238, treats the issue on ‘whether concealment of past childbirth history involves fraud sufficient to cancellation of marriage’. In the case, the wife, Vietnamese marriage-immigrant woman, had experienced childbirth in former forced marriage by means of kidnap, rape, and imprisonment at the age of 13, which is not known to her husband. When the marriage was broken up due to the repeated sexual abuse of the father-in-law and the woman filed for divorce, her husband found the past childbirth history of the wife in criminal conviction of her father-in-law, and filed a counteraction for cancellation of marriage arguing that her concealment of past childbirth history constitutes fraud and cancellation of marriage shall be granted on Korean Civil Act article 816(3). Korean Supreme Court had ruled on its decision on February 18th 2016, case No. 2015Meu654, 661 that the concealment of childbirth history, which has been caused by rape on her minority, cannot be regarded as fraud and the woman did not have a duty to inform the history to her husband when marriage. However, in the case, Korean High Court (the original court) which has been remanded the case, granted cancellation of marriage, on the reason that newly investigated facts show that her past childbirth has been caused not by “rape on her minority”, but “her marriage”. This decision was finally affirmed by Korea Supreme Court. This article argues that concealment of past childbirth history itself, whether it was caused by rape on minority or not, shall not be a ground of marriage cancellation, as the past childbirth history cannot be ‘the essential elements of marriage’. This article further argues that the forced marriage by kidnap or rape on minority should not be regarded as “marriage”. Thus this article reaches the conclusion that Korea Supreme Court’s final decision in the case should be criticized and reconsidered.
참고문헌 (17)
- (2010), 법원행정처
- "주해친족법" (2015), 박영사
- "베트남 출신 이주여성 아동성폭력으로 인한 출산경험과 혼인취소사건 지원사례 백서" (2017)[URL]
- 김주수, "친족상속법" (2020), 법문사
- 윤진수, "친족상속법강의" (2020), 박영사
- 소라미, "결혼 이주여성의 인권 실태와 한국 법제도 현황에 대한 검토", 법학논총, 16(2), pp.43~74 (2009), 법학연구원
- 신기숙, "성폭력 피해아동의 피해경험", 한국심리학회지:일반, 30(4), pp.1255~1287 (2011), 한국심리학회
- 양현아, "식민주의의 견지에서 본 2000년 여성국제법정: 일본군 성노예제라는 ‘전시 성폭력’", 민주법학, (75), pp.69~123 (2021), 민주주의법학연구회[DOI]
- 장다혜, "혼인취소를 둘러싼 젠더 폭력의 중층적 구성: 강제결혼 피해여성의 출산경력 불고지로 인한 혼인취소 인정판결을 중심으로", 페미니즘연구, 18(2), pp.47~100 (2018), 한국여성연구소[DOI]
- 정현미, "아동성폭력으로 인한 출산경력과 혼인취소의 법적 쟁점과 정책적 과제", 법학논집, 20(1), pp.131~153 (2015), 법학연구소
- 조은희, "사기에 의한 혼인취소에 있어서 고지의무", 법과정책, 23(1), pp.231~260 (2017), 법과정책연구원[DOI]
- 최준규, "출산 경력의 불고지가 혼인취소 사유에 해당하는지 여부 ―대법원 2016.2.18. 선고 2015므654, 661 판결―", 가족법연구, 31(2), pp.307~362 (2017), 한국가족법학회[DOI]
- "성폭력 피해결과인 출산경력의 미고지가 혼인 취소 사유에 해당하는지 여부" (2016)[URL]
- "J. von Staudingers Kommentar Zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz Und Nebengesetzen", ~ (2018)
- David M. Cotter, "Misrepresenting or Concealing Prior Marital History as a Ground for Annulment", Divorce Litig, 16(12), pp.219~ (2004)
- "Cultural practices in the family that are violent towards women, Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, UN Commission on Human Rights, submitted in accordance with Commission on Human Rights resolution 2001/49: 31 January 2002, E/CN.4/2002/83" (2002)[URL]
- Thomas J. Walsh, "The Law of the Family in Vietnam: Assessing the Marriage and Family Law of Vietnam", California Western International Law Journal, 42(1) (2011)
