A Look at Relative Clause Equivalents in L2 English
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article addresses erroneous RCs that are semantically equivalent but syntactically ungrammatical due to omission or incompletion of syntactic movement and copy/deletion operations resulted from inconsistent realizations of immature morphosyntactic functional features while L2 syntax is intact. The interpretive rule [Make OP] proposed in Munn (1994) was adopted to analyze the operations in RCs. The presentational amalgam construction, a SUB RC equivalent, was analyzed to be an accidental deletion of the required operator in Spec-CP during the deletion stages. The DO RC with a resumptive pronoun, a DO RC equivalent, occurred by reason of phonological realizations of remnant morphosyntactic features of the variable which were incompletely deleted, but still delivered to Spell-Out. This article attributes both SUB and DO RC equivalents to the immaturity of operator features in Spec-CP. An IO RC equivalent called the NoPrep construction is analyzed as the result of failure to fully realize the functional features of preposition, resulting in the incorporation of the preposition into the verb for remotely licensing the variable. By and large, this article tacitly adopted the position in which the development of syntax is dissociated from the development of morphology (Lardiere, 1998b; Haznedar, 2003; Herschensohn et al., 2005; Lee, 2006), and stressed out that L2 research should investigate the autonomous nature of L2 grammar without respect to the perspectives in target grammar (Bley-Vroman, 1983).
Abstract
This article addresses erroneous RCs that are semantically equivalent but syntactically ungrammatical due to omission or incompletion of syntactic movement and copy/deletion operations resulted from inconsistent realizations of immature morphosyntactic functional features while L2 syntax is intact. The interpretive rule [Make OP] proposed in Munn (1994) was adopted to analyze the operations in RCs. The presentational amalgam construction, a SUB RC equivalent, was analyzed to be an accidental deletion of the required operator in Spec-CP during the deletion stages. The DO RC with a resumptive pronoun, a DO RC equivalent, occurred by reason of phonological realizations of remnant morphosyntactic features of the variable which were incompletely deleted, but still delivered to Spell-Out. This article attributes both SUB and DO RC equivalents to the immaturity of operator features in Spec-CP. An IO RC equivalent called the NoPrep construction is analyzed as the result of failure to fully realize the functional features of preposition, resulting in the incorporation of the preposition into the verb for remotely licensing the variable. By and large, this article tacitly adopted the position in which the development of syntax is dissociated from the development of morphology (Lardiere, 1998b; Haznedar, 2003; Herschensohn et al., 2005; Lee, 2006), and stressed out that L2 research should investigate the autonomous nature of L2 grammar without respect to the perspectives in target grammar (Bley-Vroman, 1983).
참고문헌 (76)
- Alexiadou, A, "Introduction. The Syntax of Relative Clauses", pp.1~15 (2000), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Ariel, M., "Cognitive universals and linguistic conventions: the case of resumptive pronouns", Studies in Language, 23, pp.217~269 (1999)
- Baker, M. C., "Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Changing" (1985), MIT
- Bardovi-Harlig, K., "Markedness and salience in second-language acquisition", Language Learning, 37, pp.385~407 (1987)
- Bayley, R., "Relativization strategies in Mexican-American English", American Speech, 74, pp.115~139 (1999)
- Bergh, G, "Preposition stranding with wh-relatives: a historical survey", English Language and Linguistics, 4, pp.295~316 (2000)
- Bernstein, J. B, "Resumptive pronoun strategies in English speaking children", Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, ed. by Annabel Greenhill, Mary Hughes, Heather Littlefield, and Hugh Walsh, pp.58~68 (1998)
- Bissell, T., "Further Evidence for Null Pronominal Variables", 석사, pp.1999
- Bley-Vroman, R., "The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: the case systematicity", Language Learning, 33, pp.1~17 (1983)
- Borsley, R. D., "Relative clauses and the theory of phrase structure", Linguistic Inquiry, 28, pp.629~647 (1997)
- Chomsky, N., "A minimalist program for linguistic theory" (1992), MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), The MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Minimalist inquiries: The framework", pp.15~ (1998), MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics
- Chomsky, N., "Derivation by phase", pp.18~ (1999), MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics
- Chomsky, N., "Beyond explanatory adequacy", pp.20~ (2001), MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics
- Cinque, G., "On the theory of relative clauses and markedness", The Linguistic Review, 1, pp.247~294 (1982)
- Cinque, G., "Types of Ā-Dependencies" (1990), The MIT Press
- Comrie, B., "Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology" (1989), The University of Chicago Press
- Dekydtspotter, L., "Interlanguage A-bar dependencies: binding construals null prepositions and Universal Grammar", Second Language Research, 14, pp.341~358 (1998)
- Diessel, H., "The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech", Cognitive Linguistics, 11, pp.131~151 (2000)
- Diessel, H., "A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses", Language, 81, pp.882~906 (2005)
- Epstein, S. D., "Quantification in null operator constructions", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.647~658 (1989)
- Fabb, N., "The difference between restrictive and nonrestrictive relative clauses", Journal of Linguistics, 26, pp.57~78 (1990)
- Flynn, S, "Acquisition of relative clauses: developmental changes in their heads", Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics, 1, pp.33~45 (1980)
- Fox, D., "Antecedent-contained deletion and the copy theory of movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 33, pp.63~96 (2002)
- Hamilton, R. L., "Is implicational generalization unidirectional and maximal? evidence from relativization instruction in a second language", Language Learning, 44, pp.123~157 (1994)
- Hawkins, R., "Do second language learners acquire restrictive relative clauses on the basis of relational or configurational information? the acquisition of French subject, direct object and genitive restrictive relative clauses by second language learners", Second Language Research, 5, pp.156~188 (1989)
- Haznedar, B., "The status of functional categories in child second language acquisition: evidence from the acquisition of CP", Second Language Research, 19, pp.1~41 (2003)
- Herschensohn, J., "Children’s acquisition of L2 Spanish morphosyntax in an immersion setting", IRAL, 43, pp.193~217 (2005)
- Kaplan, T. I., "The category of relative clauses in Japanese, with reference to Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 4, pp.29~58 (1995)
- Klein, E. C., "Toward Second Language Acquisition: A Study of Null-Prep" (1993), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Klein, E. C., "Evidence for a ‘wild’ L2 grammar: when PPs rear their empty heads", Applied Linguistics, 16, pp.87~117 (1995)
- Klein, E. C., "construing null prepositions in L2 intergrammars: a commentary and proposal", Second Language Research, 17, pp.37~70 (2001)
- Klein, E. C., "Optionality in English non-native grammars", Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp.349~630 (1999)
- Lakshmanan, U., "The status of CP and the tensed complementizer that in the developing L2 grammar of English", Second Language Research, 10, pp.25~48 (1994)
- Lambrecht, K., "There was a farmer had a dog: syntactic amalgams revisited", Berkeley Linguistics Society, 14, pp.319~339 (1988)
- Lardiere, D., "Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state", Second Language Research, 14, pp.1~26 (1998)
- Lardiere, D., "Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar", Second Language Research, 14, pp.359~375 (1998)
- Law, P., "A unified analysis of P-stranding in Romance and Germanic", Proceedings of NELS 28, pp.219~234 (1998)
- Lebeaux, D., "The grammatical nature of the acquisition sequence: adjoin-a and the formation of relative clauses", Language Processing and Language Acquisition, pp.13~82 (1990)
- Lebeaux, D., "Relative clauses, licensing, and the nature of the derivation. Syntax and Semantics, Volume 25: Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing", pp.209~239 (1991), Academic Press
- Lee, F., "Relative clauses without wh-movement", Proceedings of NELS 31, pp.321~331 (2001)
- 이일재, "L2 Indirect Object Relative Clause Productions and Minimalism", 응용언어학, 20(2), pp.55~84 (2004), 한국응용언어학회
- Lee, I.-J., "Development of Morphosyntactic Features of the Complementizer Phrase in L2 Relative Clauses of Korean Learners", 박사, pp.2006
- 이일재, "The Acquisition of Null Prep Constructions and the Missing Surface Inflection Hypothesis", 영어영문학연구, 49(2), pp.181~205 (2007), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- Lee, I.-J., "On the unsettled difficulty order among object relative clauses of L2 English", Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24, pp.000~000 (2008)
- Lee, I.-J., "From head-internal relative clauses to head-external relative clauses and the analysis of head errors and reversal errors in L2", ~
- Lee, I.-J., "Phase penetration and L2 Korean relative clauses: a proposal against the Structural Distance Hypothesis", The Jungang Journal of English Language and Literature, 49, pp.293~316 (2007)
- McCloskey, J., "Resumptive pronouns, A'-binding, and levels of representation in Irish. Syntax and Semantics, Volume 23: The Syntax of the Modern Celtic Languages", pp.199~248 (1990), Academic Press
- McDaniel, D., "Methods for Assessing Children’s Syntax" (1996), The MIT Press
- McDaniel, D,, "Experimental evidence for a minimalist account of English resumptive pronouns", Cognition, 70, pp.B15~B24 (1999)
- McKee, C., "Resumptive pronouns in English relative clauses", Language Acquisition, 9, pp.113~156 (2001)
- Moon, G.-S., "A First Course in Formal Semantics" (1995), Hanshin Publishing Co
- Munn, A., "A null operator analysis of ATB gaps", The Linguistic Review, 9, pp.1~26 (1992)
- Munn, A., "A minimalist account of reconstruction asymmetries", Proceedings of NELS, 통권 : 24, pp.397~410 (1994)
- Nakamori, T., "Teaching relative clauses: how to handle a bitter lemon for Japanese learners and English teachers", ELT Journal, 56, pp.29~40 (2002)
- O'Grady, W., "Computational factors in the acquisition of relative clauses.Manuscripts" (2000), University of Hawaii at Manoa.
- Prevost, P., "Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition", Second Language Research, 16, pp.103~133 (2000)
- Radford, A., "Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax" (1990), Blackwell Publishing
- Radford, A., "Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Rizzi, L., "Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.501~557 (1986)
- Rizzi, L., "Relativized Minimality" (1990), The MIT Press
- Safir, K., "Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.663~689 (1986)
- Sauerland, U., "On the Making of Meaning of Chains", 박사, pp.1998
- Seppänen, A., "Relative that and prepositional complementation", English Language and Linguistics, 1, pp.111~133 (1997)
- Sharvit, Y., "Functional relative clauses", Linguistics and Philosophy, 22, pp.447~478 (1999)
- Sharvit, Y., "Resumptive pronouns in relative clauses", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 17, pp.587~612 (1999)
- Shlonsky, U., "Resumptive pronouns as a last resort", Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.443~468 (1992)
- Suñer, M., "Resumptive restrictive relatives: a crosslinguistic perspective", Language, 74, pp.335~364 (1998)
- Tarallo, F., "Interlanguage and natural language processing in second language acquisition", Language Learning, 33, pp.55~76 (1983)
- Tsimpli, I. M., "Resumptive strategies and L2A: a minimalist account. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development", pp.639~655 (1997), Cascadilla Press
- Wexler, K., "Some issues in the growth of control", pp.1~41 (1991), MIT Occasional Paper
- Wexler, K., "Parameters and learnability in binding theory. Parameter Setting, ed. by Thomas Roeper and Edwin Williams", pp.41~76 (1987), D. Reidel Publishing Company
- Williams, E., "Predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, pp.203~238 (1980)
- Wiltschko, M., "On the syntax and semantics of (relative) pronouns and determiners", Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 2, pp.143~181 (1998)
- Wolfe-Quintero, K., "Learnability and the acquisition of extraction in relative clauses and wh-questions", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, pp.39~70 (1992)