본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

자살과 문학, 그리고 셰익스피어

Suicide, Literature, and Shakespeare

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Suicide has historically been considered a subject of fear and taboo. Literature, however, has seriously dealt with suicide as a form of death, the eternal enigma of human existence, even during the period when suicide was not permitted. Shakespeare also refers to suicide as a natural deed in a number of his works in spite of the social circumstances of his time when suicide was considered religiously a sin and legally wrong. Today, as suicide has been accepted as a general fact of modern society, suicide has become one of the most prominent interests in literature. As a result, various aspects of suicide—as an extreme method of expressing a main character’s frustration and despair, a tool for solving a variety of conflicts, an indication of resistance against irregularities and corruption in society, or a result of disease, etc.—have been endlessly reproduced in various works of literature. Though suicide in literature is fictional, it embraces various mechanisms of actual suicide. This leads to understanding and sympathy, instead of condemnation or criticism, as it symbolically represents existential problems originating from the agony of the period, irregularities and corruption in society, and frustration and despair due to damage to an individual’s value and dignity. This gains sympathy not only in modern literature, but also in the suicide of Shakespeare’s characters, more broadly, in Hamlet’s death.

Abstract

Suicide has historically been considered a subject of fear and taboo. Literature, however, has seriously dealt with suicide as a form of death, the eternal enigma of human existence, even during the period when suicide was not permitted. Shakespeare also refers to suicide as a natural deed in a number of his works in spite of the social circumstances of his time when suicide was considered religiously a sin and legally wrong. Today, as suicide has been accepted as a general fact of modern society, suicide has become one of the most prominent interests in literature. As a result, various aspects of suicide—as an extreme method of expressing a main character’s frustration and despair, a tool for solving a variety of conflicts, an indication of resistance against irregularities and corruption in society, or a result of disease, etc.—have been endlessly reproduced in various works of literature. Though suicide in literature is fictional, it embraces various mechanisms of actual suicide. This leads to understanding and sympathy, instead of condemnation or criticism, as it symbolically represents existential problems originating from the agony of the period, irregularities and corruption in society, and frustration and despair due to damage to an individual’s value and dignity. This gains sympathy not only in modern literature, but also in the suicide of Shakespeare’s characters, more broadly, in Hamlet’s death.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 이용은, "자기 보존의 법칙으로 작동하는 오셀로", Shakespeare Review, 44(3), pp.461~482 (2008), 한국셰익스피어학회
  2. 이진홍, "자살" (2007), (주)살림출판사
  3. 정해룡, "타자로서의 오셀로", Shakespeare Review, 41(3), pp.471~493 (2005), 한국셰익스피어학회
  4. 최명민, "문학에 투영된 자살의 심리사회적 이해 : <광장>과 <숲속의방>을 중심으로", 비판사회정책, 29(29), pp.163~203 (2010), 비판과대안을위한사회복지학회[DOI]
  5. 최민경, "햄릿과 오필리아의 관계- 수녀원 장면과 극중극 장면을 중심으로", Shakespeare Review, 43(4), pp.785~808 (2007), 한국셰익스피어학회
  6. 홍기창, "셰익스피어 희곡론" (1999), 서울대학교출판부
  7. Alvarez, Alfred, "자살의 연구" (1992), 청하
  8. Bialosky, Jill, "너의 그림자를 읽다" (2012), 북폴리오
  9. Durkheim, Emile, "자살론" (2000), 청아
  10. Mischler, Gerd, "자살의 문화사" (2002), 시공사
  11. Monestier, Martin, "자살" (2003), 새움
  12. Sophocles, "오이디푸스 왕" (2005), 동인
  13. Bradley, A. Cecil, "Shakespearean Tragedy" (1974), Macmillan
  14. Douglas, Kennedy, "Leaving the World" (2010), Arrow Books
  15. Shakespeare, William, "Hamlet" (2005), Cambridge UP
  16. Shakespeare, William, "Othello" (2002), Cambridge UP
  17. Shakespeare, William, "Romeo and Juliet" (1959), Washington Square Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)