햄릿과 오필리어의 광기의 의미—헤겔과 라캉이론으로 바라본 광기의 재해석
The Meaning of Hamlet and Ophelia’s Madness: Reinterpretation of Madness from Hegel and Lacan Theory
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The classical period has confined madness to psychosis and silenced madness from reason, but we can see the philosophy that followed Hegel as the 19th century dawned begin to interpret madness as alienation of reason from reason itself, and alienation of civilization. The purpose of this paper is to analyze and examine the madness of Hamlet and Ophelia in Shakespeare's tragedy Hamlet in terms of the philosophical perspectives of Hegel and Lacan, not from a medical point of view. Examining the meaning of Hamlet's conscious madness, we can find the frailty and imperfections of human reason, such as extreme contradictions and anxiety, maniacal anger, extreme fear, confusion of identity and obsessive hesitancy with decision-making. However, the philosophical meaning of the madness in his life was that his madness made an opportunity to realize his limitations, allowing him to experience the situation of human existence inversely, and his rational thinking which had distinguished the phenomena of human life was sublated and expanded to the concept of infinity. Ophelia's madness means the abolition of the whole symbolic order in a state of madness, and at the same time, it means unregulated freedom and her rejecting the conformity of her symbolic order which maintained her social identity. However, as the philosophical meaning of the madness in her life, it can be said that her unconscious madness was her death drive to dismantle the alienation of the imaginary ego forced by the subject, and so the unconscious madness emphasizes the special nature of her imaginary ego that her reason canceled.
Abstract
The classical period has confined madness to psychosis and silenced madness from reason, but we can see the philosophy that followed Hegel as the 19th century dawned begin to interpret madness as alienation of reason from reason itself, and alienation of civilization. The purpose of this paper is to analyze and examine the madness of Hamlet and Ophelia in Shakespeare's tragedy Hamlet in terms of the philosophical perspectives of Hegel and Lacan, not from a medical point of view. Examining the meaning of Hamlet's conscious madness, we can find the frailty and imperfections of human reason, such as extreme contradictions and anxiety, maniacal anger, extreme fear, confusion of identity and obsessive hesitancy with decision-making. However, the philosophical meaning of the madness in his life was that his madness made an opportunity to realize his limitations, allowing him to experience the situation of human existence inversely, and his rational thinking which had distinguished the phenomena of human life was sublated and expanded to the concept of infinity. Ophelia's madness means the abolition of the whole symbolic order in a state of madness, and at the same time, it means unregulated freedom and her rejecting the conformity of her symbolic order which maintained her social identity. However, as the philosophical meaning of the madness in her life, it can be said that her unconscious madness was her death drive to dismantle the alienation of the imaginary ego forced by the subject, and so the unconscious madness emphasizes the special nature of her imaginary ego that her reason canceled.
참고문헌 (20)
- 강석주, "셰익스피어 문학의 현대적 의미" (2007), 도서출판 동인
- 강순전, "정신현상학의 이념" (2016), 세창출판사
- 쇼펜하우어, "세상을 보는 방법" (1978), 동서문화사
- 김상환, "라깡의 재탄생" (2002), 창작과비평사
- 김석, "에크리 라캉으로 이끄는 마법의 문자들" (2007), 살림출판사
- 라캉, 자크, "에크리(Ecrits)" (2019), 새물결
- 르메르, 아니카, "자크 라캉" (1994), 문예출판사
- 모리스, 팸, "문학과 페미니즘" (1997), 문예출판사
- 윤희억, "실성한 오필리어의 노래와 죽음의 상징성 연구", 신영어영문학, (40), pp.159~178 (2008), 신영어영문학회
- 이혜경, "영화로 각색된 오필리아", Shakespeare Review, 49(2), pp.275~300 (2013), 한국셰익스피어학회[DOI]
- 임승태, "『햄릿』 상연에서의 광증", 박사, pp.2016
- 헤겔, G. W. F., "정신현상학 1" (2005), ㈜도서출판 한길사
- Bradley, A. C., "Shakespearean Tragedies" (1971), London UP
- Charney, Maurice, "Hamlet without Words", A Journal of English Literary History, 32, pp.457~477 (1965)
- Greenblatt, Stephen, "Will in the world: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare" (2005), Norton
- Jones, Ernest, "Hamlet and Oedipus" (1976), Norton
- Levin, Harry, "The Question of Hamlet" (1959), Oxford UP
- Roberts, Katherine, "The Wandering Womb: Classical Medical Theory and the Formation of Female Characters in Hamlet", Classical and Modern Literature, 15(Spring), pp.223~232 (1995)
- Showalter, Elaine, "Shakespeare and the Question of Theory", pp.77~94 (1985), Methuen
- Showalter, Elaine, "The Female Malady: Women, Madness, and Culture in England, 1830-1980" (1985), Pantheon
