Pronouns and Their Referential Dependencies
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper presents a reductionist approach to binding phenomena, which was started in Hornstein (2001). We argue that the binding principle as a grammatical module, for example, like Chomsky’s (1986) definition in (1), should be eliminated along with mysterious concepts like government, and that some binding effects can be dealt with a copy theory of movement in the spirit of minimalism. In particular, it is argued that Principle A effects are Achain dependency, and that Principle B effects are derived from A' or sideward movement chain, followed by Achain. Thus, the distributional complementarity between anaphors and pronouns can be easily accounted for. This kind of approach to binding phenomena provides us with a new perspective on the pronominal DPs, because they are not lexical items from the numeration, but grammatical formatives from movement operations. In other words, they are morphological allomorphs of a copy of the antecedent, susceptible to universal or languagespecific spellout rule
Abstract
This paper presents a reductionist approach to binding phenomena, which was started in Hornstein (2001). We argue that the binding principle as a grammatical module, for example, like Chomsky’s (1986) definition in (1), should be eliminated along with mysterious concepts like government, and that some binding effects can be dealt with a copy theory of movement in the spirit of minimalism. In particular, it is argued that Principle A effects are Achain dependency, and that Principle B effects are derived from A' or sideward movement chain, followed by Achain. Thus, the distributional complementarity between anaphors and pronouns can be easily accounted for. This kind of approach to binding phenomena provides us with a new perspective on the pronominal DPs, because they are not lexical items from the numeration, but grammatical formatives from movement operations. In other words, they are morphological allomorphs of a copy of the antecedent, susceptible to universal or languagespecific spellout rule
참고문헌 (24)
- Boeckx, C., "Movement under Control", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.431~452 (2004)
- Boeckx, C., "Control as Movement" (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Bruening, B., "Against Predicatebased Reflexivity: Anaphors as Subjects of Embedded Clause", 석사, pp.2006
- Chomsky, N., "Condition on Rules of Grammar", Linguistic Analysis, 2, pp.303~351 (1976)
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, N., "Knowledge of Language" (1986), Praeger Publishers
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "The Theory of Principles and Parameters, In Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research", pp.506~569 (1993), Walter de Gruyter
- Drummond, A., "Binding Phenomena within a Reductionist Theory of Grammatical Dependencies", 박사, pp.2011
- Drummond, A., "Minimalist Construal: Two Approaches to A and B, In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism", pp.396~426 (2010), Oxford University Press
- Hicks, G., "The Derivation of Anaphoric Relations" (2009), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Hornstein, N., "Movement and Control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
- Hornstein, N., "Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal" (2001), Blackwell
- Pronouns in a Minimalist Setting, "Hornstein, N.", University of Maryland, 47~80 (2006)
- Hornstein, "A Theory of Syntax" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Huang, C. T. J., "A Note on the Binding Theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 6, pp.437~447 (1983)
- Kang, Nam-Kil, "Pronouns, Reflexives, and Sloppy Identity", 영어영문학연구, 51(3), pp.1~18 (2009), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- Kayne, R. S., "Unambiguous Paths, In Levels of Syntactic Representation", pp.143~183 (1981), Foris
- 이경화, "Agree-based Construal: With Reference to Narrowest C-command Relation", 영어영문학연구, 54(4), pp.347~368 (2012), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- Nunes, J., "Sideward Movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.303~344 (2001)
- Pollard, C., "Anaphors in English and the Scope of Binding Theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.261~303 (1992)
- Reinhart, T., "Reflexivity", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.657~720 (1993)
- Rizzi, L., "On the Anaphoragreement Effect", Rivista di Linguistica, 2, pp.27~42 (1990)
- Woolford, E., "More on the Anaphor Agreement Effect", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.257~287 (1999)