영어 심리동사 구문의 경험주에 관한 소고
A Study on the Experiencers of the English Psych Verbs
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the Experiencer Objects of the English Psych Verbs. There are two constructions which show the crossover between two thematic roles: one is the Locative Inversion Construction(LIC). The other is the Experiencer Object Psych Verbs Construction(EO-PVC). In this study, I assume that EO is another locative PP in LIC because the preposition P has [Loc] features which contain a mental location. So the EO-PVC can be called the expanded LF-LIC. Specifically, I follow Landau (2010)’s “quirky experiencers” and the basic assumptions: According to QSP, the preposition in the locative PP has a null case, “φ” in English. Just as the PP in LIC is overtly moved to the [Spec, TP] at S-Structure, so the experiencer PP in EO-PVC is covertly moved to the [Spec-TP] at LF. As a result, both constructions have the multiple specifiers. But in the former the inversion is obligatory and the subject is topicalized, but in the latter this is not the case. That’s because the LF-movement is a covert movement which is not related to the discourse function. This analysis of EO as an LF-subject help to solve the puzzles such as adjunct control, backward binding, and scope readings.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the Experiencer Objects of the English Psych Verbs. There are two constructions which show the crossover between two thematic roles: one is the Locative Inversion Construction(LIC). The other is the Experiencer Object Psych Verbs Construction(EO-PVC). In this study, I assume that EO is another locative PP in LIC because the preposition P has [Loc] features which contain a mental location. So the EO-PVC can be called the expanded LF-LIC. Specifically, I follow Landau (2010)’s “quirky experiencers” and the basic assumptions: According to QSP, the preposition in the locative PP has a null case, “φ” in English. Just as the PP in LIC is overtly moved to the [Spec, TP] at S-Structure, so the experiencer PP in EO-PVC is covertly moved to the [Spec-TP] at LF. As a result, both constructions have the multiple specifiers. But in the former the inversion is obligatory and the subject is topicalized, but in the latter this is not the case. That’s because the LF-movement is a covert movement which is not related to the discourse function. This analysis of EO as an LF-subject help to solve the puzzles such as adjunct control, backward binding, and scope readings.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김용하, "처소어구 도치 구문과 불완전 일치", 현대문법연구, 37(37), pp.113~136 (2004), 현대문법학회
- Arad, M., "VP-Structure and the syntax-lexicon interface", 박사, pp.1998
- Baker, M. C., "Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing" (1988), University of Chicago Press
- Belletti, A., "Psych-verbs and ɵ-Theory", Natural Language and Literature Theory, 6, pp.291~352 (1988)
- Bouchard, D., "The semantics of syntax : A minimalist approach to grammar" (1995), University of Chicago Press
- Bresnan, J., "Locative Inversion and Architecture of Universal Grammar", Language, 70(1), pp.72~131 (1994)
- Chomsky, N., "Aspects of the theory of syntax" (1965), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Minimalist Inquiries: The framework, In Step by Step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Derivation by phase, In Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.89~155 (2001), MIT Press
- Collins, C., "Local economy" (1997), MIT Press
- Coopmans, P., "Where stylistic and syntactic processes meet: Locative inversion in English", Language, 65, pp.728~751 (1989)
- Culicover, P. W., "Stylistic Inversion in English : A Reconstruction", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 19, pp.283~310 (2001)
- Grimshaw, J., "Argument structure" (1990), MIT Press
- Hoekstra, T., "Unergatives as copular verbs: Locational and existential predication", Linguistic Review, 7, pp.1~79 (1990)
- Iwata, S., "The distinctive character of psych-verbs as causatives", Linguistic Analysis, 25(1-2), pp.95~120 (1995)
- Jackendoff, R., "Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar" (1972), MIT Press
- Jackendoff, R., "Semantic Structure" (1990), MIT Press
- Johnson, K., "Scope and binding theory: Comments on Zubizarreta, In Syntax and semantics 26: Syntax and the lexicon", pp.259~275 (1992), Academic Press
- Kim, S-W., "A Study on the EPP in the Minimalist Program: the EPP as a PF Requirement", Studies in Modern Grammar, 24, pp.47~66 (2001)
- 김선웅, "A Null Expletive Analysis of the Locative Inversion Construction in English", 생성문법연구, 16(3), pp.387~403 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
- 김원호, "A Cross-Linguistic Survey of Psychological Predicates", 영어영문학21, 25(3), pp.223~245 (2012), 21세기영어영문학회
- Landau, I., "The Locative Syntax of Experiencers" (2010), MIT Press
- Larson, R. K., "On the Double Object Construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(3), pp.335~391 (1988)
- Levin, B., "Unaccusativity: At the Syntax- Lexical Semantics Interface" (1995), MIT Press
- Li, C. N., "Subject and Topic: A new typology of language, In Subject and Topic" (1976), Academic Press
- Nakajima, H., "Verbs in Locative Constructions and Generative Lexicon", The Linguistic Review, 18, pp.43~67 (2001)
- Pesetsky, D., "Zero syntax" (1995), MIT Press
- Pustejovsky, J., "The Generative Lexicon" (1995), MIT Press
- Reinhart, T., "Experiencing derivations", Proceedings of SALT, 11 (2001), CLC Publications
- Richards, N. W., "What moves where when in which language", 박사, pp.1997
- Valin, Van, "A Synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar, In Advanced in Role and Reference Grammar" (1993), John Benjamins