D. H. 로렌스의 『채털리 부인의 사랑』: 코니의 자아 저술하기
D. H. Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover: Connie’s Authoring Self
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article aims to examine what problems are exposed in Connie’s characterization by introducing the Bakhtinian concept, authoring hero and analyzing Connie’s character. M. M Bakhtin believes that a novelist must embody his hero because generally a hero’s performed act in the novel reenacts our acts in the real world. In the case of Connie, she redefines her sexual identity in the continuity of the dynamic interaction with others, including her husband Clifford Chatterley and his Cambridge friends, her lover Michaelis and another lover Oliver Melors. In this redefinition of her sexual identity, Connie also considers a variety of socio-economic, historical, cultural factors inherent in the industrial society, interfering her and making her free and energetic life impossible as a whole human-being. This means Connie considers her socio-economic, hierarchical situations as well as others’ opinions before she decides to live her marriage life with Mellors in a farm. Nevertheless, she rejects all or makes her rash decisions from the beginning to end without her own reflections on ‘someone else’s I’ as a Bakhtinian expression. In the Bakhtinian point of view, such a performed act is one without the multilateral consideration about ‘I-for-myself, the other-for-me, and I-for-the- other.’ This performed act of hers reduces the persuasiveness in Connie’s authoring self, and resultingly, in the sexual morality D. H. Lawrence tries to enact through his novel Lady Chatterley’s Lover.
Abstract
This article aims to examine what problems are exposed in Connie’s characterization by introducing the Bakhtinian concept, authoring hero and analyzing Connie’s character. M. M Bakhtin believes that a novelist must embody his hero because generally a hero’s performed act in the novel reenacts our acts in the real world. In the case of Connie, she redefines her sexual identity in the continuity of the dynamic interaction with others, including her husband Clifford Chatterley and his Cambridge friends, her lover Michaelis and another lover Oliver Melors. In this redefinition of her sexual identity, Connie also considers a variety of socio-economic, historical, cultural factors inherent in the industrial society, interfering her and making her free and energetic life impossible as a whole human-being. This means Connie considers her socio-economic, hierarchical situations as well as others’ opinions before she decides to live her marriage life with Mellors in a farm. Nevertheless, she rejects all or makes her rash decisions from the beginning to end without her own reflections on ‘someone else’s I’ as a Bakhtinian expression. In the Bakhtinian point of view, such a performed act is one without the multilateral consideration about ‘I-for-myself, the other-for-me, and I-for-the- other.’ This performed act of hers reduces the persuasiveness in Connie’s authoring self, and resultingly, in the sexual morality D. H. Lawrence tries to enact through his novel Lady Chatterley’s Lover.
참고문헌 (36)
- 김정매, "한국에서의 로렌스 수용 : 서지학적 연구 1930~1987" (1989), 한신문화사
- 박금희, "로렌스와 바흐친: 주체의 해방을 위한 노력", 영어영문학연구, 29(2), pp.41~64 (2003), 대한영어영문학회
- 박금희, "로렌스 소설의 바흐친적 읽기: 『사랑하는 여인들』", 현대영어영문학, 49(3), pp.73~103 (2005), 한국현대영어영문학회
- 박종성, "노마디즘 관점에서 로렌스의 Aaron’s Rod 다시 읽기", 근대영미소설, 21(1), pp.5~26 (2014), 한국근대영미소설학회
- 엄정옥, "D. H. 로렌스의 이원론적 문학세계" (1996), 원광대학교출판부
- 조일제, "원초적 실재의 탐색: D. H. 로렌스문학과 어둠의 자아" (1995), 신아사
- Bakhtin, M. M, "Dialogic Imagination", pp.259~422 (1982), Texas UP
- Bakhtin, M. M., "Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics" (1984), Minnesota UP
- Bakhtin, M. M, "Speech Genre and Other Late Essays", pp.10~59 (1986), Texas UP
- Bakhtin, M. M, "Toward a Philosophy of the Act" (1995), Texas UP
- Bakhtin, M. M., "Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics", pp.283~302 (1984), Minnesota UP
- Blanchard, Lydia, "A New Look at Lady Chatterley’s Lover", pp.17~35 (1985), George UP
- Booth. Wayne C, "Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics", pp.17~26 (1984), Minnesota UP
- Burack, Charles. D. H, "Lawrence’s Language of Sacred Experience" (2005), Palgrave Macmillan
- Clark, Katerina, "Mikhail Bakhtin" (1984), Harvard UP
- Daleski, H. M, "Forked Flame: A Study of D. H. Lawrence" (1965), Northwestern UP
- Eastman, Richard M., "A Guide to the Novel" (1965), Chandler Publishing Company
- Fleishman, Avrom, "D. H. Lawrence: A Centenary Consideration" (1985), Cornell UP
- Jameson, Fredric, "The Political Unconsciousness : Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act" (1981), Cornell UP
- Kellogg, David, "Reading Foucault Reading Lawrence: Body, Voice and Sexuality in Lady Chatterley’s Lover", D. H. Lawrence Review, 28(3), pp.31~54 (1999)
- Lawrence, D. H.., "Lady Chatterley’s Lover", pp.303~335 (2002), Cambridge UP
- Lawrence, D. H, "Selected Short Stories", pp.259~273 (1982), Penguin Books
- Lawrence, D. H., "Lady Chatterley’s Lover" (1961), Penguin Books
- Lawrence, D. H, "Study of Tomas Hardy and Other Essays", pp.171~176 (1985), Cambridge UP
- Lawrence, D. H, "Fantasia of the Unconscious and Psychoanalysis and the Unconscious", pp.200~250 (1960), Penguin Books
- Lawrence, D. H, "Study of Tomas Hardy and Other Essays", pp.193~198 (1985), Cambridge UP
- Leavis, F. R, "D. H. Lawrence: Novelist" (1981), Penguin Books
- Leavis, F. R., "Thought, Words, and Creativity : Art and Thought in Lawrence" (1976), Chatto & Windus
- Lodge, David, "After Bakhtin", pp.57~74 (1990), Routledge
- Morson, Gary Saul, "Mikhail Bakhtin : Creation of a Prosaics" (1990), Stanford UP
- Peters, Joan Douglas, "Rhetoric as Idea: D. H. Lawrence’s Genre Theory", Style, 34(1), pp.36~51 (2000)
- Ryu, Doo-Sun, "D. H. Lawrence’s The Rainbow and Women in Love: A Critical Study" (2005), Peter Lang
- Salgãdo, Gãmini, "A Preface to Lawrence" (1982), Longman House
- Spilk, Mark., "The Love Ethic of D. H. Lawrence" (1955), Cambridge UP
- Voloshinov. V. N, "Freudianism: A Critical Sketch" (1987), Indiana UP
- Voloshinov. V. N, "Marxism and the Philosophy of Language" (1973), Seminar Press