명사-동사 전환의 다의성: 비전형적 명사 파생동사를 중심으로
Polysemy on Noun-to-Verb Conversion in English: A Case with Non-prototypical Denominal Verbs
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to reveal the motivation of meaning extension of denominal verbs that do not include the lexicalized meaning of their parent nouns but denote their typical action by analyzing polysemy of noun-to-verb conversions. Denominal verbs are based not only on the lexicalized meaning of their parent noun, but also on the various concepts it evokes. This argument is supported by the conceptual traces of the parent noun remaining in the meaning of the converted verb. Such a concept-based approach allows us to analyze the semantic relatedness of conversion pairs in which the meaning of the parent noun is not included in the meaning of its derived verb. As seen in the conversion process [shipN (a large boat used for carrying people or goods by sea) → shipV1 (transport by ship) → shipV2 (transport)], shipV1 is converted from shipN, and then shipV2 is derived by expanding the semantic scope of the parent noun integrated within the converted verb shipV1. Through generalization, which is one of the mechanisms of semantic change, it is possible to explain the motivation of the semantic extension of denominal verbs that denote the typical action of their parent noun without its lexicalized meaning.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to reveal the motivation of meaning extension of denominal verbs that do not include the lexicalized meaning of their parent nouns but denote their typical action by analyzing polysemy of noun-to-verb conversions. Denominal verbs are based not only on the lexicalized meaning of their parent noun, but also on the various concepts it evokes. This argument is supported by the conceptual traces of the parent noun remaining in the meaning of the converted verb. Such a concept-based approach allows us to analyze the semantic relatedness of conversion pairs in which the meaning of the parent noun is not included in the meaning of its derived verb. As seen in the conversion process [shipN (a large boat used for carrying people or goods by sea) → shipV1 (transport by ship) → shipV2 (transport)], shipV1 is converted from shipN, and then shipV2 is derived by expanding the semantic scope of the parent noun integrated within the converted verb shipV1. Through generalization, which is one of the mechanisms of semantic change, it is possible to explain the motivation of the semantic extension of denominal verbs that denote the typical action of their parent noun without its lexicalized meaning.
참고문헌 (29)
- 김진형, "영어형태론", pp.97~127 (2009), 종합출판 EnG
- Aronoff, Mark, "Word formation in generative grammar" (1976), The MIT Press
- Balteiro, Isabel, "A contribution to the study of conversion in English" (2007), Waxmann
- Beard, Robert E, "Lexeme-morpheme base morphology : A general theory of inflection and word-formation" (1995), State University of New York Press
- Clark, Herbert H, "Understanding old words with new meanings", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, pp.591~608 (1983)
- Davies, Ceri, "A corpus-based investigation of noun to verb conversion in English", pp.2004
- Dirven, René, "Metonymy in language and thought", pp.275~287 (1999), John Benjamins
- Dirven, René, "Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics" (2004), John Benjamins
- Héois, Aurélie, "2020 When proper names become verbs : A semantic perspective", Lexis, 16 (2022)[DOI]
- Jensen, John T, "Morphology : Word structure in generative grammar" (1990), John Benjamins
- Kiparsky, Paul, "Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL-1981", pp.3~91 (1982), Hanshin Publishing Comapny
- Kiparsky, Paul, "Word-formation in the lexicon", Proceedings of the 1982 mid-America linguistics conference, pp.3~29 (1983), University of Kansas
- Koskela, Anu, "Encyclopedia of language and linguistics", pp.742~744 (2006), Elsevier
- Langacker, Ronald W, "Topics in cognitive linguistics", pp.49~69 (1988), John Benjamins
- Marchand, Hans, "A set of criteria for the establishing of derivational relationship between words unmarked by derivational morphemes", Indogermanische Forschungen, 69, pp.10~19 (1964)
- Martsa, Sándor, "Homonymy vs. polysemy: Conversion in English", Symposium on lexicography X. Proceedings of the tenth international symposium on lexicography, pp.211~229 (2002), Max Niemeyer Verlag
- Martsa, Sándor, "Conversion in English: A cognitive semantic approach" (2013), Cambridge Scholars Publishing
- Martsa, Sándor, "Rule or analogy? : The case of English conversion", Argumentum, 10, pp.449~471 (2014)
- Miller, George A, "Linguistic theory and psychological reality", pp.60~118 (1978), The MIT Press
- Plag, Inog, "Morphological productivity : Structural constraints in English derivation" (1999), Mouton de Gruyter
- Plag, Inog, "Word-formation in English" (2018), Cambridge University Press
- Rainer, Franz, "The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology", pp.338~353 (2014), Oxford University Press
- Sanders, Gerald, "Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics", pp.155~175 (1988), Academic Press
- Siegel, Dorothy, "Topics in English morphology", pp.1974
- Spencer, Andrew, "Lexical relatedness : A paradigm-based model" (2013), Oxford University Press
- Twardzisz, Piotr, "Zero derivation in English : A cognitive grammar approach" (1997), Maria Curie-Sklodowska University Press
- Tyler, Leslie Jo, "The syntax and semantics of zero verbs: A minimalist approach", pp.1999
- Wilson, Deirdre, "Handbook of pragmatics", pp.607~632 (2004), Blackwell
- Zhadeyko, Marina, "Anthropolinguistic aspect of English polysemy" (2010), Lulu