본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Two Types of Verbs Created with Concrete Nouns

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Clark and Clark (1979) claim that innovative denominal verbs in English select their meanings uniquely in a given context. However, recently, Choi (2016) suggests that Korean concrete-noun- hata verbs, which correspond to English denominal verbs, possibly select multiple meanings in one context. Adopting the relevance theory of Sperber and Wilson (1986) and Wilson and Sperber (2006), the paper demonstrates that Choi's suggestion can also be applied to English denominal verbs. This paper also explains why most innovative denominal verbs in English seem to choose a single meaning in a given context. When verbs created with concrete nouns are less stable, they try to maximize cognitive effects by strengthening previously held assumptions and by eliminating false assumptions rather than adding more meanings.

Abstract

Clark and Clark (1979) claim that innovative denominal verbs in English select their meanings uniquely in a given context. However, recently, Choi (2016) suggests that Korean concrete-noun- hata verbs, which correspond to English denominal verbs, possibly select multiple meanings in one context. Adopting the relevance theory of Sperber and Wilson (1986) and Wilson and Sperber (2006), the paper demonstrates that Choi's suggestion can also be applied to English denominal verbs. This paper also explains why most innovative denominal verbs in English seem to choose a single meaning in a given context. When verbs created with concrete nouns are less stable, they try to maximize cognitive effects by strengthening previously held assumptions and by eliminating false assumptions rather than adding more meanings.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. 최영주, "How Metonymy Influences Grammar: The Case of Concrete-Noun-plus-hata Constructions in Korean", 담화와 인지, 23(4), pp.137~158 (2016), 담화·인지언어학회
  2. Clark, Eve, "When Nouns Surface as Verbs", Language, 55, pp.767~811 (1979)
  3. 조윤경, "Innovative denominal verbs in English : a semantic analysis", 석사, ?, pp.2001
  4. Korean Linguistics, vol. 10, "Japanese", pp.2000, Jun, Jong-Sup
  5. Pinker, Steven, "Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure" (1989), MIT Press
  6. Pustejovsky, James, "The Generative Lexicon" (1995), MIT Press
  7. 송정근, "구체명사와 결합하는 ‘하다’의 의미 특성에 대하여", 한국어 의미학, 22, pp.123~140 (2007), 한국어의미학회
  8. Sperber, Dan, "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" (1986), Basil Blackwell
  9. Wilson, Deirdre, "The Handbook of Pragmatics", pp.607~632 (2006), Wiley-Blackwell
  10. Yim, Seo-hyun, "Combination of the Verb Ha-(Ta) ‘do' with the Event", Entity Type Nouns in Korean: Exploration Based on Generative Lexicon, Seoul National University, 2004

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)