본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

금융시장발전과 공적개발원조의 효과성: 양자간・다자간 원조를 중심으로

Recipient Countries’ Financial Development and the Effectiveness of ODA

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the effectiveness of Offcial Development Assistance (ODA) in recipient countries' economy. ODA is designed to mitigate poverty and stimulate economic growth in the developing countries. We classify total ODA into bilateral ODA and multilateral ODA depending on the number of donor countries. If the ODA flows from one donor country to one recipient country, it is classified as bilateral ODA. If the multiple countries simultaneously become donor countries through the international organizations such as United Nations and World Bank, it is classified as multilateral ODA. This paper compares the effect of bilateral ODA and multilateral ODA in determining recipient countries' economic development, and tries to provide policy implications to Korean ODA. Research design, data, and methodology - Our primary explanatory variables are bilateral and multilateral ODA. Private credit in recipient countries is adopted as additional explanatory variables to capture the level of financial development in recipient countries. We measure the ODA effectiveness using economic growth and quality of life of the recipient countries as the dependent variable. We collect 142 recipient countries' data from OECD statistics, during the period from 1970-2014. Panel least squares estimation with country fixed effect is employed as the empirical model. Results - Our results support that ODA variable has a negatively significant impact on recipient countries' economic growth, while it is positively correlated with human development index. Recipient countries' private credit is positively correlated with economic growth and human development index. The interaction variable of ODA and financial development turns out to be significant in general. We find that the positive effect of ODA depends on recipient countries' financial market development and this effect is stronger in multilateral aid than bilateral one. Conclusions - From the analysis, we have confirmed that the recipient countries financial development is the necessity condition to achieve positive effect of ODA. Based on these results, we suggest that Korean government should increase the share of multilateral funding and pay attention to recipient countries' financial market development to maximize the effectiveness of ODA.

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the effectiveness of Offcial Development Assistance (ODA) in recipient countries' economy. ODA is designed to mitigate poverty and stimulate economic growth in the developing countries. We classify total ODA into bilateral ODA and multilateral ODA depending on the number of donor countries. If the ODA flows from one donor country to one recipient country, it is classified as bilateral ODA. If the multiple countries simultaneously become donor countries through the international organizations such as United Nations and World Bank, it is classified as multilateral ODA. This paper compares the effect of bilateral ODA and multilateral ODA in determining recipient countries' economic development, and tries to provide policy implications to Korean ODA. Research design, data, and methodology - Our primary explanatory variables are bilateral and multilateral ODA. Private credit in recipient countries is adopted as additional explanatory variables to capture the level of financial development in recipient countries. We measure the ODA effectiveness using economic growth and quality of life of the recipient countries as the dependent variable. We collect 142 recipient countries' data from OECD statistics, during the period from 1970-2014. Panel least squares estimation with country fixed effect is employed as the empirical model. Results - Our results support that ODA variable has a negatively significant impact on recipient countries' economic growth, while it is positively correlated with human development index. Recipient countries' private credit is positively correlated with economic growth and human development index. The interaction variable of ODA and financial development turns out to be significant in general. We find that the positive effect of ODA depends on recipient countries' financial market development and this effect is stronger in multilateral aid than bilateral one. Conclusions - From the analysis, we have confirmed that the recipient countries financial development is the necessity condition to achieve positive effect of ODA. Based on these results, we suggest that Korean government should increase the share of multilateral funding and pay attention to recipient countries' financial market development to maximize the effectiveness of ODA.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Hyeonmi Ahn, "Donor Country’s Fiscal Status and ODA Decisions before and after 2008 Global Financial Crisis", 산경연구논집, 9(1), pp.25~38 (2018), 한국유통과학회
  2. Alfaro, L., "FDI and economic growth : the role of local financial markets", Journal of international economics, 64(1), pp.89~112 (2004)
  3. Ang, J. B., "Does foreign aid promote growth? Exploring the role of financial liberalization", Review of Development Economics, 14(2), pp.197~212 (2010)
  4. Arestis, P., "Financial development and economic growth : assessing the evidence", The Economic Journal, 107(442), pp.783~799 (1997)
  5. 백승관, "ASEAN+3의 금융 및 경제협력과 제도의 질: 평가와 전망", 국제금융연구, 5(2), pp.5~43 (2015), 한국국제금융학회[DOI]
  6. Bourguignon, F., "Aid Effectiveness? Opening the Black Box", American Economic Review, 97(2), pp.316~321 (2007)
  7. Burnside, C., "Aid, Policies, and Growth", American Economic Review, 90(4), pp.847~868 (2000)
  8. Calderón, C., "The direction of causality between financial development and economic growth", Journal of development economics, 72(1), pp.321~334 (2003)
  9. Chenery, H. B., "Foreign assistance and economic development", The American Economic Review, 56(4), pp.679~733 (1966)
  10. 최공필, "AIIB를 활용한 역내 개방 플랫폼 구축 전략", 국제금융연구, 6(2), pp.5~24 (2016), 한국국제금융학회[DOI]
  11. 정태영, "우리나라 공적개발원조(ODA)의 효과성에 관한 연구", 국제경영리뷰, 20(4), pp.211~229 (2016), 한국국제경영관리학회
  12. Dalgaard, C. J., "On the empirics of foreign aid and growth", The Economic Journal, 114(496), pp.191~216 (2004)
  13. Dang, H. A., "International aid and financial crises in donor countries", European Journal of Political Economy, 32, pp.232~250 (2013)
  14. 엄영호, "한국 ODA의 구속성 여부에 관한 경험적 분석", 행정논총, 52(1), pp.123~144 (2014), 한국행정연구소
  15. Easterly, W., "Can Foreign Aid Buy Growth?", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), pp.23~48 (2003)
  16. Benno Ferrarini, "Chinese Corporate Leverage Determinants", The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 4(1), pp.5~18 (2017), 한국유통과학회
  17. "Aid and the financial crisis: Shall we expect development aid to fall?" (2009)[URL]
  18. 황재희, "공적개발원조(ODA)의 원조효과성과 한국 ODA에 대한 시사점", 한국지역개발학회지, 28(5), pp.177~198 (2016), 한국지역개발학회
  19. 강윤호, "한국 ODA(공적개발원조) 제도의 문제점과 개선방안", 한국행정논집, 26(3), pp.601~628 (2014), 한국정부학회
  20. 구정우, "세계사회와 공적재발원조: 한국 ODA 결정요인 분석, 1989-2007", 한국사회학, 45(1), pp.153~190 (2011), 한국사회학회
  21. Kosack, S., "Effective aid : How democracy allows development aid to improve the quality of life", World development, 31(1), pp.1~22 (2003)
  22. 이천우, "국제 공적개발원조의 신조류와 한국의 ODA정책", 산업경제연구, 24(2), pp.777~808 (2011), 한국산업경제학회
  23. 이미혜, "Do Firm and Bank Level Characteristics Matter for Lending to Firms during the Financial Crisis?", 산경연구논집, 9(5), pp.37~46 (2018), 한국유통과학회
  24. Levine, R., "Financial development and economic growth : Views and agenda", Journal of economic literature, 35(2), pp.688~726 (1997)
  25. Levine, R., "Bank-based or market-based financial systems: Which is better", Journal of financial intermediation, 11(4), pp.398~428 (2002)
  26. Maizels, A., "Motivations for aid to developing countries", World Development, 12(9), pp.879~900 (1984)
  27. Milner, H. V., "Why Multilateralism? Foreign Aid and Domestic Principal-Agent Problems", Delegation and agency in international organizations, 107, ~ (2004)
  28. Minoiu, C., "Development aid and economic growth : A positive long-run relation", The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 50(1), pp.27~39 (2010)
  29. Mishra, P., "Health aid and infant mortality", International Monetary Fund (No.2007-2100), ~ (2007)
  30. Neumayer, E., "The determinants of aid allocation by regional multilateral development banks and United Nations agencies", International Studies Quarterly, 47(1), pp.101~122 (2003)
  31. Neumayer, E., "Is respect for human rights rewarded? An analysis of total bilateral and multilateral aid flows", Human Rights Quarterly, 25(2), pp.510~527 (2003)
  32. Ram, R., "Roles of bilateral and multilateral aid in economic growth of developing countries", Kyklos, 56(1), pp.95~110 (2003)
  33. Williamson, C. R., "Foreign aid and human development : The impact of foreign aid to the health sector", Southern Economic Journal, 75(1), pp.188~207 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)