예외격 구문과 타동사 결과구문 비교 및 (모조) 예외격 요소 분석
ECM Constructions, Transitive Secondary Resultative Constructions, and Their (Fake) ECM Elements
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Exceptional case-marking(ECM) in linguistics is a phenomenon in which the subject of an embedded infinitival verb in English seems to appear in a matrix clause and, if it is a pronoun, is unexpectedly marked with object case morphology. The unexpected object case morphology is deemed “exceptional”. Transitive secondary resultative constructions in Korean have nonfinite CP structures which include a null pro or a bare noun of inalienable possessums, or partitive elements in the subject position. The current paper investigates into the syntactic peculiarities of the transitive resultative construction in comparison with the ECM construction. It also delves into the syntactic position and the discourse effect phenomenon of the (fake) ECM element in the two types of constructions. We note that in the typical ECM construction, the matrix transitive verb takes a complement clause as a direct object, but in the transitive resultative constructions, the transitive verb takes a fake ECM element as a direct object. We suggest that the fake or pure ECM element occupies the matrix Spec-v* as a sentential contrastive topic, although the two elements are syntactically different in that one is a direct object of the matrix transitive verb and the other is an adjunct positioned in the matrix Spec-v*.
Abstract
Exceptional case-marking(ECM) in linguistics is a phenomenon in which the subject of an embedded infinitival verb in English seems to appear in a matrix clause and, if it is a pronoun, is unexpectedly marked with object case morphology. The unexpected object case morphology is deemed “exceptional”. Transitive secondary resultative constructions in Korean have nonfinite CP structures which include a null pro or a bare noun of inalienable possessums, or partitive elements in the subject position. The current paper investigates into the syntactic peculiarities of the transitive resultative construction in comparison with the ECM construction. It also delves into the syntactic position and the discourse effect phenomenon of the (fake) ECM element in the two types of constructions. We note that in the typical ECM construction, the matrix transitive verb takes a complement clause as a direct object, but in the transitive resultative constructions, the transitive verb takes a fake ECM element as a direct object. We suggest that the fake or pure ECM element occupies the matrix Spec-v* as a sentential contrastive topic, although the two elements are syntactically different in that one is a direct object of the matrix transitive verb and the other is an adjunct positioned in the matrix Spec-v*.
참고문헌 (45)
- 오충연, "국어 결과 구문의 범주 설정에 대한 연구", 언어연구, 26(3), pp.595~619 (2010)
- 이두원, "한국어의 주어 NP의 통사구조에서 존칭자질 삼투", 언어과학연구, 103, pp.127~145 (2022)
- 이두원, "이차결과구문 다시 보기: 타동사 결과구문의 결손 pro 위치를 중심으로", 영어영문학연구, 65(1), pp.185~216 (2023)
- 이두원, "영어와 한국어 이차결과구문 어떻게 다른가?", 인문과학논총, 12, pp.203~224 (2023), 국립한국교통대학교 인문과학연구소
- 이두원, "비정형절의 주어 : 타동사 결과구문과 예외격표시구문을 중심으로", 언어학 연구, 68, pp.89~118 (2023)
- 이두원, "우향이동한 비정형절 주어의 수용성 실험 연구", 언어학 연구, 70, pp.81~102 (2024)
- 홍기선, "영어와 국어의 인상 구문 비교 분석", 어학연구, 33(3), pp.409~433 (1997)
- 홍기선, "영어의 결과구문과 한국어의"게"구문", 언어, 36(4), pp.1143~1169 (2011)
- 홍용철, "한국어에서의 예외격(ECM)구문과 자동 주격 분석", 생성문법연구, 24(3), pp.659~686 (2014)
- Bruening, Benjamin, "Syntax at the edge: Cross-clausal phenomena and the syntax of Passamaquoddy", pp.2001
- Choi, YoungSik, "Korean resultative construction redux", The Journal of Studies in Language, 38(2), pp.169~187 (2022)
- Chomsky, Noam, "A festschrift for Morris Halle", pp.232~286 (1973), Holt, Rinehart & Winston
- Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, Noam, "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Constant, Noah, "Contrastive topic: Meanings and realizations", pp.2014
- Dowty. David, "Word meaning and Montague grammar" (1979), Reidel Publishing Company
- Goldberg, Adele, "Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
- Hoekstra, Teun, "Small clause results", Lingua, 74, pp.101~139 (1988)
- Johnson, Kyle, "Object positions", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 9, pp.577~636 (1991)
- Kang, Yungyeong, "The key constructions in Korean predicate : Head or a complementizer", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 9, pp.433~442 (2001)
- Kim. Chonghyuk, "Raising to object in Korean", pp.2005
- Kim, Rhanghyeyun, "On the negativity of negative fragment answers and ellipsis resolution", Studies in Generative Grammar, 23, pp.447~468 (2013)
- Kim, Soowon, "Resultatives: English vs", Korean. Journal of Korean Linguistics, 7, pp.363~379 (1998)
- Kwon, Jongil, "A split analysis of Korean transitive resultative constructions", Studies in Linguistics, 54, pp.87~110 (2020)
- Kwon, Jongil, "A non-raising appraoch to matrix object in Korean ECM constructions", The Jungang Journal of English Language and Literature, 51(2), pp.115~143 (2022)
- Lasnik, Howard, "Papers from the twenty-seventh regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society", pp.324~343 (1991), Chicago Linguistic Society
- Lee, Doo-Won, "The peripheral movement of nun-marked nominals", Studies in Generative Grammar, 15(4), pp.563~580 (2005)
- Lee, Doo-Won, "Inquiries into Korean linguistics II", pp.491~500 (2006), Thaehaksa
- Lee, Doo-Won, "Subject raising vs. non-subject raising", The Jungang Journal of English Language and Literature, 51(2), pp.179~196 (2009)
- Lee, Doo-Won, "Do so anaphora in English and Korean: With respect to depictives, temporal adjuncts and ECM constructions", The Jungang Journal of English Language and Literature, 55(4), pp.483~504 (2013)
- Lee, Doo-Won, "ECMed position and NCI fragment licensing", Studies in Modern Grammar, 78, pp.21~46 (2014)
- Lee, Jeong-Shik, "The role of case on exceptional case marking", Studies in Generative Grammar, 5(1), pp.265~318 (1995)
- Lee, Wooseung, "ECM constructions redux", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 37(3), pp.697~717 (2012)
- Levin, Beth, "Unaccusativity : At the syntax-lexical semantic interface" (1995), MIT Press
- Park, Myung-Kwan, "On amwuto ‘anyone’ and its kin in Korean:Their status and licensing as a fragment answer", Studies in Generative Grammar, 23, pp.585~602 (2013)
- Postal, Paul, "On Raising: One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications" (1974), MIT Press
- Rappaport Hovav, Malka, "An event structure account of English resultatives", Language, 77, pp.766~797 (2001)
- "An economy theory of PRO" (2022)[URL]
- Shim, Ji Young, "The tense of resultatives: The case of Korean", NELS, 38, pp.337~350 (2009)
- Simpson, Jane, "Lexical-functional grammar", pp.143~157 (1983), Indiana University Linguistics Club
- Smith, Carlota, "The parameter of aspect" (1991), Kluwer
- Sohn, Ho-Min, "Korean grammar" (1996), Cambridge University Press
- Vendler, Zeno, "Linguistics in philosophy" (1967), Cornell University Press
- Yeo, Seungju, "Some notes on resultatives in Korean", Studies in Generative Grammar, 16(4), pp.687~706 (2006)
- Yoon, James Hye-Suk, "Raising of major arguments in Korean and Japanese", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, pp.615~653 (1996)