아버지의 절도-실인에 대한 자식의 대응 ―논어와 에우티프론의 비교 및 현재적 조명―
A Study Confrontation of Son about Theft and Murder of Father ―the comparison of Confucius between Euthiphro and at present a view―
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
Why is son complaint or concealment when father theft or murder? It had been treating a problem across the ages and countries of the world. Koea criminal law not punish a person for a crime. Euthiphro and Subgong speak a young man not reasonable. Confucius and Socrates is reasonabled. Hanfei of parents samed Confucius and Socrates. Hanfei of king samed Euthiphro and Subgong. Subgong is based on a village. Euthiphro is based on Zeus. Confucius is based on a family. Socrates is based on general god. But there is not reasonable. Especially nation the maintenance of public security low is a point of view right. But there is criminal law not right. The other side nation the maintenance of public security law is a point of view not right or there is criminal law right.
참고문헌 (2)
- 문채규, "국가보안법 폐지 후 형법보완론의 구체적 내용에 대한 형법 이론적 분석－열린우리당이 2004년 10월 20일 발의한 형법중개정법률안을 중심으로－", 법학연구, 47(2)통권 : 56, pp.251~273 (2007), 법학연구소