실체법과 절차법의 상호의존성
The Interdependence of substantive law and procedural law
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
A legal system consists of a large number of legal norms. Legal norms are classified into public/private law, substantive/procedural law etc. according to each criterion. Among them, the division of substantive law and procedural law has great significance for philosophy of law. Since a modern legal system consists not merely of substantive law, but also of procedural law, it is impossible to inquire into the nature of law without correct understandings of procedural law. According to the traditional understanding, substantive law or material law(Ger. materielles Recht) creates, defines, and regulates the contents of rights and duties, procedural law(Ger. Verfahrensrecht/formelles Recht) governs application or realization of substantive law. Behind the traditional understanding, there is a implicit presupposition that procedural law is ancillary to substantive law. But procedural law also constitutes material legal relations by conferring of rights or imposition of duties. So it seems dubious whether procedural law only serves to realize substantive law. While substantive law regulates ordinary domain of life outside of state intervention, procedural law regulates it’s procedure, organization. A unified system of substantive law and procedural law can protect, guarantee, and remedy rights. Substantive law and procedural law intermingled with each other are interdependent in legal systems. No procedural law without substantive law, no substantive law without procedural law.
참고문헌 (27)
- H. Kelsen, "Reine Rechtslehre", pp.236~238 (1960), Aufl
- 변종필, "순수 법학", pp.355~358 (1999), 길안사
- L. Rosenberg, "Zivilprozeßrecht", pp.7~ (2004), C.H. Beck
- O. Jauernig, "Zivilprozeßrecht", pp.6~ (1993), Aufl
- 정동윤, "민사소송법", pp.42~43 (2005), 법문사
- A. Kollmann, "Begriff- und Problemgeschichte des Verhältnisses von formellem und materiellem Recht", pp.677~679 (1996), D.&H
- 양창수, "민법입문", pp.336~337 (1995), 박영사
- Blacks, "Law Dictionary", 42~
- D. Schmalz, "Methodenlehre für das juristische Studium", pp.32~50 (1992), Nomos
- W. Henckel, "Prozeßrecht und materielles Recht" (1970), Otto Schwarz
- W. Sauer, "Allgemeine Prozeßrechtslehre", pp.1~ (1951), Heymann
- H.-M. Pawlowski, "Aufgabe des Zivilprozesses", pp.345~391 (1967), ZZP 80
- G. Stahlmann, "Zur Theorie des Zivilprozeßrechts", pp.31~51 (1979), Athenäum
- B. Windscheid, "Die Actio des römischen Civilrechts vom Standpunkte des heutigen Rechts" (1856), Beddeus
- R. von Jhering, "Der Zweck im Recht Bd" (1883), Breitkopf & Härtel
- A. Hegler, "Zum Aufbau der Systematik des Zivilprozeßrechts in Festgabe für Philipp Heck, Max Rümelin, Arthur Benno Schmidt", pp.216~244 (1931), Mohr
- G. Radbruch, "Rechtsphilosophie", pp.277~ (1973), Aufl
- 최종고, "법철학", pp.237~ (2001), 삼영사
- O. Bülow, "Die Lehre von den Proceßeinreden und die Proceßvoraussetzungen", pp.1~3 (1868), Roth
- O. Bülow, "Klage und Urteil. Eine Grundfrage des Verhältnisses zwischen Privatrecht und Prozeß", ZZP, (31), pp.191~270 (1903)
- W. Simshäuser, "Zur Entwicklung des Verhältnisses von materielles Recht und Prozeßrecht seit Savigny － Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel rechtsfremder Klagen", pp.101~102 (1965), Gieseking
- J. Goldschmidt, "Materielles Justizrecht", pp.85~152 (1905), Festgabe für Bernhard Hübler zum 70
- J. Goldschmidt, "Über Begriff und Bedeutung des materiellen Ziviljustizrechts", pp.109~138 (1914), Festschrift für Heinrich Brunner zum 50
- J. Goldschmidt, "Der Prozeß als Rechtslage", Julius Springer, pp.211~253 (1925)
- W. Burchhardt, "Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaft", pp.137~138 (1948), Polygraphischer Verlag
- A. Procházka, "Normative Theorie und Rechtserzeugung i n Die Brünner rechtstheoretische Schule", pp.304~323 (1980), Manz
- H. Fenge, "Prozessrecht und Materielles Recht als Teilsysteme einer Rechtsordnung", pp.251~259 (1986), Rechtstheorie Beiheft 10