‘있는 법’과 ‘있어야 할 법’의 연관성
‘Law as it is’ and ‘Law as it ought to be’
2
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
This paper examines three contemporary mainstream legal philosophers, namely whether their analytical or constructive theories can meet the demand of the changing society and be considered as sufficiently reflective on the nature of law. On the basis of a critical analysis of the main hypotheses underlying their theories, this paper asks whether they restrict the legal thought to the lawyer’s daily business by putting aside the problem of the justification of the legal sanction. This paper argues that, if we want to take seriously the relation of law and values, that means law as a moral idea, the non-positivist legal thought presents significant advantages over rival approaches. According to this non-positivist legal thought, the question of ‘the law as it is’ can not be separated from the question of ‘the law as it ought to be’. Law is a human institution as fact. But at the same time it is an ideal standard against which our institutions are measured. In that sense this paper tries to advance a normative argument for a pluralist legal theory based on two central pillars: overcoming the descriptive/prescriptive dualism, and the judiciary centered constructivism.
참고문헌 (18)
- Erich Fechner, "Soziologie und Metaphysik des Rechts", pp.53~ (1962), Tübingen
- Hans Kelsen, "Reine Rechtslehre", pp.329~ (1960)
- Von Ota Weinberger, "Neue Betrachtungen Über Kants Kritizismus - Die Bedeutung seiner kritischen Theorie für die Jurisprudenz", Rechtstheorie, 35, pp.150~ (2004)
- Stanley Fish, "The Law Wishes to Have a Formal Existence in Closure or Critique. New Directions in Legal Theory", pp.157~ (1993), Edinburgh University Press
- Wilhelm Ebel, "Recht und Form. Vom Stilwandel im deutschen Recht", pp.14~ (1975), J.C.B. Mohr:Tübingen
- Mario G. Losano, "Turbulenzen im Rechtssystem der Modernen Gesellschaft - Pyramide, Stufenbau und Netzwerkcharakter der Rechtsordnung als ordnungsstiftende Modelle", Rechtstheorie, 38 (2007)
- 론 L. 풀러, "법의 도덕성" (1971), 법문사
- 허버트 하트, "법의 개념", pp.336~337 (2001), 아카넷
- 로널드 드워킨, "법의 제국" (2004), 아카넷
- Ronald Dworkin, "Justice in Robes", pp.1~ (2006), Harvard University Press
- C. Douzinas, "Antigone’s Law. A genealogy of jurisprudence in Politics, Postmodernity and Critical Legal Studies. The Legality of the Contingent" (1994), London and New York
- Whitman, Sophocles, "A Study in Heroic Humanism" (1951), Harvard University Press
- Harold J, "The Limitations of the Expert", pp.8~ (1931), The Fabian Society
- E. Ehrlich, "Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law" (1936), Harvard University Press
- 최종고, "법상징학이란 무엇인가" (2000), 아카넷
- s in Changing Law. Rights, Regulation and Reconciliation, "Frozen Chooks Revisited: The Challenge of Changing Law", pp.2005, Reg Graycar
- Joseph Raz, "The Authority of Law", pp.213~ (1979), Oxford
- The Lord Justice Scarman, "Truth and the Legal Process" (1976), Memorial Lecture University of Bristol