본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

"The Messiah of Aaron and Israel": Do We See Single or Double?

“The Messiah of Aaron and Israel”: Do We See Single or Double?

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기독교신학

초록

At the center of the debate over Qumran messiahship is the phrase “the messiah of Aaron and Israel” from the Damascus Document (or CD). One crux of this phrase is whether it designates one figure or two figures. On the one hand, many scholars see the double messiahship in the phrase, whereas not a small number of scholars challenge this view. The present paper seeks to solve this problem and argues that the phrase refers to two messianic figures. The paper first analyzes the phrase grammatically, then investigates the relevant passages in CD, and lastly examines the evidence from other scrolls and the Hebrew Bible. The discussion focuses mostly on philological aspects. First, the paper argues that “the messiah of Aaron and Israel” could be read as referring to more than one figure. Three points are presented: (1) the phrase “the messiah of Aaron and Israel,” if singular, would be intrinsically redundant and awkward; (2) the existence of a distributive construct in Hebrew makes it possible to read “the messiah of Aaron and Israel” as plural; (3) the verb ykpr in CD XIV, 19, which could support a singular reading if it were active, seems to be passive because there is no direct object marker in the context. Second, the phrase “Aaron and Israel” refers to two separate entities rather than one. Third, in CD, the dual leadership of the sacred leader and the secular one prevails not only in the eschatological setting, but also in the past and the present. Fourth, data from other scrolls and the Bible too point to the plausibility of the double messiahship. The paper treats only the philological aspect of messiahship in CD, but it is hoped that it serves as a stepping stone for entering into the study of the messiahship of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Judeo-Christian tradition.

Abstract

At the center of the debate over Qumran messiahship is the phrase “the messiah of Aaron and Israel” from the Damascus Document (or CD). One crux of this phrase is whether it designates one figure or two figures. On the one hand, many scholars see the double messiahship in the phrase, whereas not a small number of scholars challenge this view. The present paper seeks to solve this problem and argues that the phrase refers to two messianic figures. The paper first analyzes the phrase grammatically, then investigates the relevant passages in CD, and lastly examines the evidence from other scrolls and the Hebrew Bible. The discussion focuses mostly on philological aspects. First, the paper argues that “the messiah of Aaron and Israel” could be read as referring to more than one figure. Three points are presented: (1) the phrase “the messiah of Aaron and Israel,” if singular, would be intrinsically redundant and awkward; (2) the existence of a distributive construct in Hebrew makes it possible to read “the messiah of Aaron and Israel” as plural; (3) the verb ykpr in CD XIV, 19, which could support a singular reading if it were active, seems to be passive because there is no direct object marker in the context. Second, the phrase “Aaron and Israel” refers to two separate entities rather than one. Third, in CD, the dual leadership of the sacred leader and the secular one prevails not only in the eschatological setting, but also in the past and the present. Fourth, data from other scrolls and the Bible too point to the plausibility of the double messiahship. The paper treats only the philological aspect of messiahship in CD, but it is hoped that it serves as a stepping stone for entering into the study of the messiahship of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Judeo-Christian tradition.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Abegg, Martin G., Jr, "The Dead Sea Scrolls after Fifty Years: A Comprehensive Assessment(2 vols)", pp.325~358 (1998), Brill
  2. Abegg, Martin G., Jr, "The Messiah at Qumran: Are We Still Seeing Double?", Dead Sea Discoveries, 2, pp.124~144 (1995)
  3. Brooke, George J., "The Messiah of Aaron in the Damascus Document", R, evue de Qumran, 15, pp.215~230 (1991)
  4. 정희경, "‘Kipper 행위’ 개념을 통해 본 속죄제(taJ'x;)의 이중적 기능연구에 대한구조비평 텍스트 언어학적 분석: 레위기 4장을 중심으로", 구약논단, 22(1), pp.10~37 (2016), 한국구약학회[DOI]
  5. Collins, John J., "The Scepter and the Star: The Messiahs of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Other Related Literature(ABRL)" (1995), Doubleday
  6. Craig A. Evans, "Israel’s Messiah in the Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls", pp.85~101 (2003), Baker Academic Press
  7. Cross, Frank M., "The Ancient Library of Qumran" (1995), Fortress
  8. Cross, Frank M., "Current Research and Technological Developments on the Dead Sea Scrolls: Conference on the Texts from the Judean Desert", pp.1~13 (1996), Brill
  9. Davies, Philip R., "The Dead Sea Scrolls in Their Historical Context", pp.219~232 (2000), T&T Clark
  10. Dimant, Devorah, "Jewish Writings of the Second Temple Period: Apocrypha, Pseudepigrapha, Qumran Sectarian Writings, Philo, Josephus(CRINT)", pp.483~550 (1984), Van Gorcum
  11. García Martínez, Florentino, "Current Research and Technological Developments on the Dead Sea Scrolls: Conference on the Texts from the Judean Desert", pp.14~40 (1996), Brill
  12. Ginzberg, Louis, "An Unknown Jewish Sect" (1976), KTAV
  13. Ginzberg, Louis, "Eine unbekantte jüdische Sekte" (1922)
  14. 홍성혁, "메시아 예언 본문들에 나타난 ‘샬롬’(평화)", 구약논단, 21(1), pp.121~152 (2015), 한국구약학회[DOI]
  15. Hurst, L. D., "Did Qumran Expect Two Messiahs?", Bulletin for Biblical Research, 9, pp.157~180 (1999)
  16. Joüon, Paul, "A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew 2 vols" (2000), Pontifical Biblical Institute
  17. Nitzan, Bilhah, "Eschatology in the Bible and in Jewish and Christian Tradition", pp.132~151 (1997), Sheffield Academic Press
  18. Rowley, H. H., "The Zadokite Fragments and the Dead Sea Scrolls" (1952), Blackwell
  19. Schniedewind, William M., "The Provo International Conference on the Dead Sea Scrolls: Technological Innovations, New Texts, and Reformulated Issues", pp.523~536 (1999), Brill
  20. VanderKam, James C., "The Community of the Renewed Covenant:The Notre Dame Symposium on the Dead Sea Scrolls" (1994), University of Notre Dame Press
  21. Vermes, Geza, "The Complete Dead Sea Scrolls in English" (2004), Penguin
  22. Waltke, Bruce K., "A nchor Bible Dictionary 5", pp.932~940 (1992), Doubleday
  23. Xeravits, Géza G., "King, Priest, Prophet: Positive Eschatological Protagonists of the Qumran Library" (2003), Brill

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)