본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

국제형사재판소 검사의 면책증거개시의무와 면책증거해당성 판단행위

ICC Prosecuter's duty to disclose exculpatory evidence

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

근래 형사소송법 개정으로 증거개시에 관한 논의가 활발해지고 있는 상황에서 영미법계와 대륙법계의 타협의 소산인 로마조약(Rome Statute)에 근거한 국제형사재판소(International Criminal Court)의 증거개시제도를 고찰해 보는 것은 국내 실무가들과 학자들에게 의미 있는 일이라고 생각된다. 이에 증거개시 중에서도 특히 면책증거에 대한 증거개시업무와 관련하여 최근에 발생했던 국제형사재판소의 위기를 현장에서 지켜보았던 필자의 경험을 바탕으로 그 사건을 동 재판소의 증거개시 관련 법규와 국제형사실무에 근거하여 되새김질해 보았다. 대륙법계의 예를 따라, 검사의 객관성의 원칙을 규정하고 검사에게 혐의사실뿐만 아니라 면책사실에 대한 수사의무도 함께 부과하고 있는 로마조약의 법적 토대를 고려해 볼 때, 필자는 국제형사재판소 검사의 면책증거개시의무는 기존의 여타 국제형사재판기구들의 그것과는 상당히 다른 성격을 띠게 된다고 생각한다. 이러한 맥락에서 검사의 면책증거해당성 판단행위가 갖는 중요성과 그에 수반된 위험성을 실제 발생했던 사례를 통해 반추해 보는 것은 국제형사법에 관심이 있는 법률가들에게 많은 시사점을 던져줄 수 있을 것이다.

참고문헌 (66)

  1. 권오곤, "헤이그통신 (16): 검찰의 지위", 법률신문, ~ (2008)
  2. 김영석, "국제형사재판소법강의" (2003), 법문사
  3. 백기봉, "국제형사증거법" (2008), 박영사
  4. Giuliano Turone, "Powers and duties of the Prosecutor, in The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a commentary", Oxford University Press
  5. J. Jones, "International Criminal Practice" (2003), Oxford University Press
  6. S. Zappala, "The Prosecutor’s Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Materials and the Recent Amendment to Rule 68 ICTY RPE", Journal of International Criminal Justice, ~ (2004)
  7. Sienho Yee, "The Tu Quoque Argument as a Defence to International Crimes, Prosecution or Punishment", Chinese Journal of International Law, 3 (2004)
  8. Colloquium of Prosecutors of International Criminal Tribunals on The Challenges of International Criminal Justice, "Report of the Proceedings", ~ (2004)
  9. "독일 형사소송법 (Strafprozeßordnung, StPO), 제160조 제2항", ~
  10. "노르웨이 형사소송법 (Act of 22 May 1981 No. 25), 제226조 제3항", ~
  11. "스웨덴 사법절차법 (Ds 1998:65), Chapter 23, Section 4", ~
  12. "콜롬비아 1991년 헌법, 제250조, 제5항", ~
  13. "영국 Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, Chapter 25, Part 1, 3(1)(a)", ~
  14. A.C. 367,
  15. "미국 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194 (1963)", ~
  16. "미국 United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 107, 96 S.Ct. 2392 (1976)", ~
  17. "미국 United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 105 S.Ct. 3375 (1985)", ~
  18. "Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  19. "Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  20. "Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  21. "Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  22. "Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  23. "Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  24. "Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  25. "Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  26. "Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  27. "Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  28. "Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  29. "Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  30. "Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  31. "Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo, ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  32. "Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01", 05-01, ~
  33. "Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01", 05-01, ~
  34. "Lubanga 사건 2006년 6월 23일 절차진행회의 속기록, ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  35. "Lubanga 사건 2007년 10월 1일 심리 속기록 ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  36. "Lubanga 사건 2008년 1월 10일 절차진행회의 속기록 ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  37. "Lubanga 사건 2008년 1월 18일 구두결정 속기록 ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  38. "Lubanga 사건 2008년 3월 13일 심리 속기록, ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  39. "Lubanga 사건 2008년 5월 28일 절차진행회의 속기록 ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  40. "Lubanga 사건 2008년 11월 25일 절차진행회의 속기록ICC-01", 04-01, ~
  41. "Prosecutor v. Delalić et al, Decision on the Request of the Accused Hazim Delić pursuant to Rule 68 for Exculpatory Information, T.Ch., 24 June 1997", ~ (1997)
  42. "Prosecutor v. Blaskić, Decision on the Defence Motion for Reconsideration of the Ruling to Exclude from Evidence Authentic and Exculpatory Documentary Evidence, IT-95-14-T, T.Ch., 30 January 1998", ~ (1998)
  43. "Prosecutor v. Blaskić, Decision on the Defence Motion for ‘Sanctions for Prosecutor’s repeated Violations of Rule 68 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence’, T.Ch., 29 April 1998", ~ (1998)
  44. "Prosecutor v. Kupreskić, Trial Judgement, IT-95-16, T.Ch., 14 January 2000", ~ (2000)
  45. "Prosecutor v. Kupreskić, Appeals Judgement, IT-95-16-A, App.Ch., 23 October 2001", ~ (2001)
  46. "Prosecutor v. Brdjanin, Decision on Motion for Relief from Rule 68 Violations by the Prosecutor and for Sanctions to be Imposed pursuant to Rule 68bis and Motion for Adjournment While Matters Affecting Justice and a Fair Trial can be Resolved, IT-99-36-T, T.Ch., 30 October 2002", ~ (2002)
  47. "Prosecutor v. Blagojević et al, Joint Decision on Motions Related to Production of Evidence, IT-02-60-PT, T.Ch., 12 December 2002", ~ (2002)
  48. "Prosecutior v. Halilović, Decision on Defence Motion for Identification of Suspects and other Categories Among its Proposed Witnesses, IT-01-48-PT, T.Ch., 14 November 2003", ~ (2003)
  49. "Prosecutor v. Krstić, Judgement, IT-89-33-A, App.Ch., 19 April 2004", ~ (2004)
  50. "Prosecutor v. Blaskić, Appeals Judgement, IT-95-14-A, App.Ch., 29 July 2004", ~ (2004)
  51. "Prosecutor v. Brdanin, Decision on Appellant’s Motion for Disclosure Pursuant to Rule 68 and Motion for an Order to the Registrar to Disclose Certain Materials, IT-99-36-A, Appeals Chamber, 7 December 2004", ~ (2004)
  52. "Prosecutor v. Kordić, Appeals Judgement, IT-95-14", 2-A, App.Ch., 17 December 2004, 2004
  53. "Prosecutor v. Limaj et al, IT-03-66, ICTY Trial Judgement, 30 November 2005", ~
  54. "Prosecutor v. Blaskić, Judgement, IT-97-24-A, App.Ch., 22 March 2006", ~ (2006)
  55. "Prosecutor v. Bralo, Decision on Motions for Access to Ex-Parte Portions of the Record on Appeal and for Disclosure of Mitigating Material, IT-95-17-A, App.Ch., 30 August 2006", ~ (2006)
  56. "Prosecutor v. Milutinović et al, Decision on Cross-Motions in relation to Evidence of Zoran Lilic, IT-05-87-T, T.Ch., 27 April 2007", ~ (2007)
  57. "Prosecutor v. Prilić et al, Decision on the Mode of Interrogating Witnesses, IT-04-74, T.Ch., 10 May 2007", ~ (2007)
  58. "Prosecutor v. Seselj, Order regarding Disclosure of Material pursuant to Rule 68(I) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, IT-03-67-PT, ICTY The Pre-Trial Judge, 9 July 2007", ~ (2007)
  59. "Prosecutor v. Delić, Decision adopting Guidance on the Admission and Presentation of Evidence and Conduct of Counsel in Court, IT-04-83, T.Ch., 24 July 2007", ~ (2007)
  60. , ICTR-95-1A-A, App.Ch., 6 February 2002, , 2002
  61. "Prosecutor v. Rutaganda, Decision on the Urgent Defence Motion for Disclosure and Admission of Additional Evidence and Scheduling Order, ICTR-96-3-A, App.Ch., 12 December 2002", ~ (2002)
  62. "Prosecutor v. Karemera et al, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Regarding the Role of the Prosecutor's Electronic Disclosure Suite in Discharging Disclosure Obligations, ICTR-98-44-AR73.7, App.Ch., 30 June 2006", ~ (2006)
  63. "Prosecutor v. Kondewa, Decision on Motion to Compel the Production of Exculpatory Witness Statement, Witness Summaries and Materials Pursuant to Rule 68, SCSL-04-14-T, T.Ch., 8 July 2004", ~ (2004)
  64. "Prosecutor v. Sesay et al, Decision on Defence Motion for Disclosure pursuant to Rule 66 and 68 of the Rules, SCSL-2004-15-T, T.Ch., 9 July 2004", ~ (2004)
  65. "Prosecutor v. Brima et al, Decision on Kanu Motion to Disclose Prosecution Material and", or Other Information Pertaining to Rewards to Prosecution Trial Witnesses and Brima’s Motion in Support, SCSL-04-16-T, T.Ch., 16 March 2005, 2005
  66. "Prosecutor v. Sesay et al, Decision on Sesay Motion Seeking Disclosure of the Relationship Between Governmental Agencies of the United States of America and the Office of the Prosecutor, SCSL-04-15-T, T.Ch., 2 May 2005", ~ (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)