인터넷개인방송에서의 위법행위 증가와 그 합리적 규제방안

Abstract

Today, the advent of Internet personal broadcasting has allowed mankind to express individual opinions more freely, swiftly and extensively than ever before. However, the adverse effects of Internet personal broadcasting have emerged as a big social problem, with Internet private broadcasting not only providing the net function of expanding freedom of expression, but also recently making deviant broadcasting that goes beyond the limit of freedom of expression. This has led to the need for tougher legal regulations on Internet private broadcasting. While the protection of Internet personal broadcasting is an extension of the freedom of expression, the regulation of Internet personal broadcasting is related to the protection of victims' personal rights. Thus, if the government regulates Internet personal broadcasting with a focus on guaranteeing the personal rights of the victims, it will result in the violation of freedom of expression. The article aims to present regulatory measures for Internet personal broadcasting, which focuses on the harmony of freedom of expression and personal rights. Based on these ideas, the text will first analyze the status of Internet personal broadcasting to examine its problems, followed by the analysis of the current legal system for Internet personal broadcasting and the problems of legal The conclusion proposed reasonable improvement measures of the current law as a short-term solution and proposed self-regulation of Internet personal broadcasting-related entities as a long-term solution. Public regulation by state agencies cannot be a long-term alternative, given that a large amount of information is delivered to an unspecified number of people in real time. Rather, self-regulation by users who are exposed to information in real time and by platform service providers, which are interested parties, can be a faster and more efficient countermeasure. This article argued that the regulation system of Internet personal broadcasting should go forward to self-regulation by Internet private broadcasting-related entities. Furthermore, it concluded that reasonable regulation measures of Internet personal broadcasting could be put forward to protect the basic values of free democratic broadcasting by harmonizing freedom of expression and personal rights.