The Elevation of Ulleungdo from an Island to a Province and the Korean Government’s Expression of Governmentality as Territorial Nationalism
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Korean government’s announcement of “Imperial Decree No. 41” was a direct expression of the Korean government’s effort to systematize governmentality over Ulleungdo and express that effort as a matter of territorial nationalism. “Imperial Decree No. 41” marked the full transformation of the Korean government’s will to exercise governmentality over Ulleungdo into territorial nationalism, which is why the Decree must be understood not just as an arbitrary declaration of territorial sovereignty, but the Korean government’s determined and resolute expression of an official urge to clearly end and reject all possibilities for contention and disputation from Japan concerning Ulleungdo. Finally, although Korea was powerless to change the course of the Russo-Japanese War, the Korean government maintained its original perception that Ulleungdo is Korean territory even throughout the war, which shows that the Korean government was not a passive bystander to Japanese intrusions into Ulleungdo, but fully aware that Japan was intent on seizing Ulleungdo by force. Such a perception clearly proves that in spite of the outbreak of a war between foreign countries which desired to usurp and eclipse Korea permanently from the world map, the Korean government was still cognizant of Ulleungdo as Korean territory despite the chaos and confusion caused by a foreign war. In essence, from the very moment Japanese citizens initiated their intrusions in the early 1880s to the eve of Korea’s annexation by Japan, the Korean government made consistent administrative and diplomatic efforts to assure that Dokdo and Ulleungdo remained under Korean jurisdiction.
Abstract
The Korean government’s announcement of “Imperial Decree No. 41” was a direct expression of the Korean government’s effort to systematize governmentality over Ulleungdo and express that effort as a matter of territorial nationalism. “Imperial Decree No. 41” marked the full transformation of the Korean government’s will to exercise governmentality over Ulleungdo into territorial nationalism, which is why the Decree must be understood not just as an arbitrary declaration of territorial sovereignty, but the Korean government’s determined and resolute expression of an official urge to clearly end and reject all possibilities for contention and disputation from Japan concerning Ulleungdo. Finally, although Korea was powerless to change the course of the Russo-Japanese War, the Korean government maintained its original perception that Ulleungdo is Korean territory even throughout the war, which shows that the Korean government was not a passive bystander to Japanese intrusions into Ulleungdo, but fully aware that Japan was intent on seizing Ulleungdo by force. Such a perception clearly proves that in spite of the outbreak of a war between foreign countries which desired to usurp and eclipse Korea permanently from the world map, the Korean government was still cognizant of Ulleungdo as Korean territory despite the chaos and confusion caused by a foreign war. In essence, from the very moment Japanese citizens initiated their intrusions in the early 1880s to the eve of Korea’s annexation by Japan, the Korean government made consistent administrative and diplomatic efforts to assure that Dokdo and Ulleungdo remained under Korean jurisdiction.
참고문헌 (18)
- Akimoto, Daisuke, "Takeshima or Dokdo? Toward Conflict Transformation of the Japan-Korea Territorial Dispute", Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal, 22(1), pp.52~87 (2020)
- Bae, Chinsoo, "Territorial Issue in the Context of Colonial History and International Politics: The Dokdo Issue between Korea and Japan", The Journal of East Asian Affairs, 26(1), pp.19~51 (2012)
- "2020", Pukyong National University
- Choi, Sung-jae, "The Politics of the Dokdo Issue", Journal of East Asian Studies, 5(3), pp.465~494 (2005)
- Ikegami, Masako, "Solving the Dokdo", Takeshima Dispute : Searching for Common Ground through the Aland Model, 2009, pp.23(1), 1~22
- 조강봉, "울릉도, 독도의 지명 연구", 지명학, 14, pp.211~252 (2008), 한국지명학회
- Kim, Kang-il, (2020), The Northeast Asian History Foundation
- Kim, Sungbae, "Understanding the Dokdo Issue: A Critical Review of the Liberalist Approach", The Journal of East Asian Affairs, 24(2), pp.1~27 (2010)
- Kim, Ye-seul, (2021), The Northeast Asian History Foundation
- 김영수, "대한제국 칙령 제41호 전후 석도와 독도 등의 명칭 관련 한국의 인식", 역사학보, (242), pp.106~133 (2019), 역사학회
- Kwon, Edward, "Shinzo Abe’s Scheme of Staking Territorial Claims to Korea’s Dokdo", The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies, 3(1), pp.47~64 (2016)
- Li, Tania M., "Governmentality", Anthropologica, 49(2), pp.275~281 (2007)
- "Sovereignty over Takeshima"[URL]
- "2010", 1
- Storey, David, "States, Territory, and Sovereignty", Geography, 102(3), pp.116~121 (2017)
- "The Northeast Asian History Foundation", The Northeast Asian History Foundation, ~ (2020)
- 유미림, "차자(借字)표기 방식에 의한 ‘석도=독도’설 입증", 한국정치외교사논총, 34(1), pp.37~71 (2012), 한국정치외교사학회[DOI]
