<이춘풍전>, 형성 시기 논란과 향유의 문제

Abstract

This paper raises the issue from a short book review by Lee Myung-sun, who worked in a liberated space. Until then, Lee Chunpung-jeon was a rare version that only had ImHwa. He introduced two pieces of information after watching Kim Young-seok’s Lee Chunpung-jeon, who made a modern novel based on the book that ImHwa had. One is that there are few copies, and the other is that it is a modern product. Th is does not fi t the current research results, but why did they evaluate this way at the time? It is based on the fact that the creation period of Lee Chunpung-jeon was quite late. Th ere are 32 copies that I investigated, all of which were transcribed around 1900. Although the period of creation and the period of transcription cannot be identified, approximately the period of enjoyment can also be confi rmed by this. In addition, the evaluation as a modern product was also possible because the creation period was late. It is only based on the modern values that diligence works as a greater force than pleasure. Values that emphasize that patriarchal authority that is not based on values of diligence is in vain are diffi cult to think of in the Middle Ages. From this point of view, Lee Chunpung-jeon is reasonable to read as the latest or early modern work in the Middle Ages. Lee Chunpung-jeon was created in 1896 based on NamJoonYeoGeol serialized in HansungShinbo. MuSukTaRyeong , which was enjoyed in 1860, was converted into a reading around 1890, NamJoonYeoGeol was a parody of it, and Lee Chunpung-jeon was a adaptation of NamJoonYeoGeol. It was not an unusual phenomenon that novels serialized in newspapers were transcribed and made into new classic novels in the process. From this point of view, the existence of ChuWolJeon, a simple transcription of the newspaper series NamJoonYeoGeol, and Lee Chunpung-jeon, which was adapted there, are also the results of revealing one of the ways of enjoying novels according to the media transition at the time.