문학비평에서 마르크스 변용의 한 양상: 김인환의 텍스트를 중심으로

Abstract

Kim In-hwan's criticism contains a great many references which are hidden under textures. The primary purpose of this study is to examine the acceptance and adaptation of Marxist theory in Kim In-hwan's critical writings. To this end, I try to find the Marxian thoughts included in Kim In-hwan's two axes of critical theory, one is his principles theory and the other is his stages theory, and try to explain the meaning and intention of strange formulas in his criticism. Capital is a massive book. If we want to look out upon the relationship between literature and reality, we cannot bypass Marx's thoughts contained in the book. It can be understood that the formulas inserted in Kim In-hwan's critical writings are intended to summarize the entire contents of Capital Vol.Ⅰ, Vol.Ⅱ, and Vol.Ⅲ without citing Marx's lines directly. Insofar as literature is bound to social reality, the summing-up of Marx’s Critique of political economy enabled Kim In-hwan's critical writings to connect science as an objective recognition of reality with literature as a denial of fetishism in reality, and provide the criteria to judge literary works and authors. this study will consider what feeble hope the speculativity that literary criticism inevitably possesses can convey to us.