본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Minjung Perspective in the Theology of Suh Nam-dong Revisited

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기독교신학

초록

Minjung theology arose in the middle of the 1970s against background of the political oppression of the dictatorial military regime and the economic deprivation of urban workers and rural peasants in South Korea. In this situation, most of Korean churches were not concerned with the poor and the oppressed. Beginning in 1975, however, some progressive theologians unified their references to the poor and oppressed as Minjung and began to develop Minjung theology. One of them is Suh Nam-dong. In this article, his way of theologizing is analyzed within Suh Nam-dong’s own theological interest and structures and methodological frameworks, and criticized in terms of evangelical perspective. As a result of analyzing his writings on Minjung theology, one cannot but notice that in Suh the context of Minjung is on par with the text of the Bible or even the Bible takes a secondary position as a “reference book.” It is clearly denied that the Bible is the absolute standard for faith and practice. He does not accept the Bible as the absolute standard, instead regards it as a political textbook. The Bible is the revelation of God’s redemptive history for our salvation. One of serious problems in Minjung theology, is that all the theologies start not from the Bible, but from the various social references. To Minjung theologians, including Suh, the Bible is the book of Minjung, only for Minjung, and take it as a social biography for Minjung. According to Suh, the major events of the Bible like Exodus, cross, resurrection and others are to be re-interpreted exclusively in terms of socio-economic perspective, centering on the political liberation of the oppressed Minjung. They are said to have been concrete historical reference points and nothing else. Jesus’ resurrection, for example, loses its uniqueness in that Jesus’ resurrection is identified with the self-conscious awareness of Minjung as the subject of history. In this sense, we have to ask this question, “Is Minjung theology really a Christian theology?”

Abstract

Minjung theology arose in the middle of the 1970s against background of the political oppression of the dictatorial military regime and the economic deprivation of urban workers and rural peasants in South Korea. In this situation, most of Korean churches were not concerned with the poor and the oppressed. Beginning in 1975, however, some progressive theologians unified their references to the poor and oppressed as Minjung and began to develop Minjung theology. One of them is Suh Nam-dong. In this article, his way of theologizing is analyzed within Suh Nam-dong’s own theological interest and structures and methodological frameworks, and criticized in terms of evangelical perspective. As a result of analyzing his writings on Minjung theology, one cannot but notice that in Suh the context of Minjung is on par with the text of the Bible or even the Bible takes a secondary position as a “reference book.” It is clearly denied that the Bible is the absolute standard for faith and practice. He does not accept the Bible as the absolute standard, instead regards it as a political textbook. The Bible is the revelation of God’s redemptive history for our salvation. One of serious problems in Minjung theology, is that all the theologies start not from the Bible, but from the various social references. To Minjung theologians, including Suh, the Bible is the book of Minjung, only for Minjung, and take it as a social biography for Minjung. According to Suh, the major events of the Bible like Exodus, cross, resurrection and others are to be re-interpreted exclusively in terms of socio-economic perspective, centering on the political liberation of the oppressed Minjung. They are said to have been concrete historical reference points and nothing else. Jesus’ resurrection, for example, loses its uniqueness in that Jesus’ resurrection is identified with the self-conscious awareness of Minjung as the subject of history. In this sense, we have to ask this question, “Is Minjung theology really a Christian theology?”

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Ahn, Byung-mu, "Stories of Minjung Theology" (1987), Korean Theological Research Center
  2. Committee of Theological Study Korean National Council of Churches, "Minjung and Korean Theology in Korea" (1983), Korean Theological Study Institute
  3. Conn, Harvie M, "Eternal Word and Changing World" (1984), Zondervan
  4. Conn, Harvie M., "Contextual Theologies: The Problem of Agendas", Westminster Theological Journal, 52(1), pp.51~63 (1990)
  5. Gutierrez, G., "A Theology of Liberation: History, Politics, and Salvation" (1973), Orbis
  6. Hong, Chi-mo, "The Problem of ‘Han’ in Minjung Theology", Chongshin Nonmunjip, 9, pp.5~21 (1990)
  7. Jin, Kwang-su, "Minjung Theology of Suh Nam-dong: An Example of Korean Theology", Th. M, pp.1986
  8. Kim, Myung-hyuk, "Doctrine of God in Minjung Theology and Its Socio-economic Traits", Bible and Theology, 2, pp.264~305 (1984)
  9. Kim, Seyoon, "Is ‘Minjung Theology’ a Christian Theology?", Calvin Theological Journal, 22, pp.251~274 (1987)
  10. Kim, Yong-bock, "Minjung Social Biography and Theology", Asia Theological Journal, 1(2), pp.523~530 (1987)
  11. Lee, Jung Young, "An Emerging Theology in World Perspective:Commentary on Korean Minjung Theology" (1988), Twenty-Third Publications
  12. Lee, Ki-baik, "A New History of Korea" (1976), Il-cho-kak
  13. Lee, Kwang Hee, "Evaluation of Minjung Theology from the Reformed Position: Critique of its Religious Ground Motive", Th. M, pp.1990
  14. Min, Y., "Minjung Theology Debate in Korea" (1985), Dae-wha Publishing Co
  15. 박응규, "민중신학의 천년왕국사상에 대한비판적 고찰", 개혁논총, 37, pp.9~34 (2016), 개혁신학회
  16. Suh, Nam-dong, "Studies of Minjung Theology" (1983), Han-gil-sa
  17. Suh, Nam-dong, "Theology at a Turning Point" (1976), Korean Theological Research Center
  18. Yu, Dong-sik, "Streams of Korean Theology: An Introductory History of Korean Theological Thought" (1982), Jun-mang-sa

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)