소비자중재에서 소비자보호의 문제
The Consumer Protection in Consumer Arbitration
0
조회
0
다운로드
28
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
These days, arbitration actively is used in many areas as the most effective dispute settlement scheme alternating trial of the court. In Korea, consumer arbitration has not yet revitalized, but due to many merits arbitration system has such as promptness of dispute settlement, flexibility of procedure, tendency to use arbitration as alternative dispute resolution in consumer dispute will gain strength in the future. In the face of revitalization movement of consumer arbitration, it is required to examine consumer protection in consumer arbitration. The protection considering specific circumstance of consumer who is not used to business relations is required in consumer arbitration. However, it is unnecessary to exclude the protection from arbitration subject of consumer dispute or do the protection through limitations on the time or method of arbitration agreement, since these will obstruct revitalization of consumer arbitration. Consumer protection in consumer arbitration has to be done through imposition of duty to offer accurate information to consumer. Also, it is desirable for consumer protection to be achieved in preventive level, and post-governance arbitration like application for setting aside award to court due to conflict with the ordre public should be avoided.
Abstract
These days, arbitration actively is used in many areas as the most effective dispute settlement scheme alternating trial of the court. In Korea, consumer arbitration has not yet revitalized, but due to many merits arbitration system has such as promptness of dispute settlement, flexibility of procedure, tendency to use arbitration as alternative dispute resolution in consumer dispute will gain strength in the future. In the face of revitalization movement of consumer arbitration, it is required to examine consumer protection in consumer arbitration. The protection considering specific circumstance of consumer who is not used to business relations is required in consumer arbitration. However, it is unnecessary to exclude the protection from arbitration subject of consumer dispute or do the protection through limitations on the time or method of arbitration agreement, since these will obstruct revitalization of consumer arbitration. Consumer protection in consumer arbitration has to be done through imposition of duty to offer accurate information to consumer. Also, it is desirable for consumer protection to be achieved in preventive level, and post-governance arbitration like application for setting aside award to court due to conflict with the ordre public should be avoided.
참고문헌 (35)
- 김상일, "미국의 소비자중재에 관한 판례의 최근동향", 비교사법, 9(3), pp.~33 (2002), 한국비교사법학회
- 김석철, "소비자 피해구제 실태분석을 통한 소비자 중재제도 도입방안 연구", 중재연구, 12(1), pp.207~239 (2002), 한국중재학회
- 김석철, "소비자 피해구제 실태분석을 통한 소비자 중재제도 도입방안 연구", 중재연구, 12(1), pp.207~239 (2002), 한국중재학회
- Weihe, "Der Schutz der Verbraucher im Recht der Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit", pp.3~ (2005)
- 석광현, "국제상사중재법연구", pp.28~ (2007)
- Mäsch, "Schiedsvereinbarungen mit Verbrauchern, In FS für Schlosser", pp.532~ (2005)
- Schlosser, "Das Recht des internationalen privaten Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, 2. Aufl", pp.308~ (1989)
- "BGH NJW", 1753~ (1996)
- Tweeddale, "Arbitration of Commercial Disputes", pp.594~ (2005)
- Budnitz, "Arbitration of Disputes Between Consumers and Financial Institutions: A Serious Threat to Consumer Protection", Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 10(167) (1995)
- Smith, "Mandatory Arbitration Clauses in Consumer Contracts: Consumer Protection and the Circumvention of the Judicial System", DePaul Law Review, 50(1191) (2001)
- Sternlight, "Consumer Arbitration, In Arbitration Law in America", pp.131~ (2006)
- "Mandatory arbitration clauses have consumers signing away the right to sue"[URL]
- Jarvin, "Schwedisches und deutsches Schiedsverfahrensrecht im Vergleich, In Law of International Business and Dispute Settlement in the 21th Century", pp.319~ (2001)
- "Commission Recommendation 98", 257
- "Wilko v. Swan, 346 U.S. 427 (1953)", ~ (1953)
- "Alexander v. Anthony Crane Int'l, 341 F.3d 256 (3d Cir. 2003)", ~ (2003)
- "Allied-Bruce Terminex Companies, Inc. v. Dobson, 513 U.S.26 5 (1995)", ~ (1995)
- Sternlight, "Consumer Arbitration, In Arbitration Law in America", pp.138~ (2006)
- "Consumer Credit Fair Dispute Resolution Act", 107th Cong (2001)
- "Budnitz"[URL]
- Linda Demaine, "“Volunteering” To Arbitrate Through Predispute Arbitration Clauses: The Average Consumer's Experience", LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS, 67(55) (2004)
- Glossner, "Das Schiedsgericht in der Praxis, 4. Aufl", pp.93~ (2000)
- 목영준, "상사중재법론", pp.42~ (2000)
- Schwab, "Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, 7. Aufl", pp.5~ (2005)
- 강병근, "UNCITRAL모델중재법의 개정 ―제39차 유엔국제무역법위원회 본회의를 중심으로", 한림법학 FORUM, 17, pp.23~ (2006)
- Raeschke-Kessler, "Binnenmarkt, Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit und ordre public", EuZW, pp.149~ (1990)
- Heymann, "Der ordre public in der privaten Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit", pp.183~ (1969)
- "Münchner Kommentar ZPO, Bd. 3", pp.1059~ (1992)
- 석광현, "국제상사중재법연구", pp.220~ (2007)
- "독일은 증권거래법(WpHG Gesetz über den Wertpapierhandel)", ~