"Trade Wars are Good and Easy to Win"-from Security Exceptions to Post-WTO World

키워드

참고문헌 (89)

1. "Bahrain - Measures Relating to Trade in Goods and Services, and Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, WT", DS527, pp.2017, ~
2. "China – Measures related to the exportation of rare earths, tungsten, and molybdenum, WT", DS431, R, 7 August 2014, 2014[DOI]
3. "European Union – Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Cold-Rolled Flat Steel Products from Russia, WT", DS521, DS462, pp.8, 11October 2013[DOI]
4. "European Union – Cost Adjustment Methodologies and Certain Anti-Dumping Measures on Imports from Russia, WT", DS474, pp.2014, ~
5. "European Union – Cost Adjustment Methodologies and Certain Anti-Dumping Measures on Imports from Russia (second complaint), WT", DS494, DS475, pp.AB, R, 23 February 2017
6. "European Union and its Member States – Certain Measures Relating to the Energy Sector, WT", DS476, pp.2018, ~
7. "Russia – Anti-Dumping Duties on Light Commercial Vehicles from Germany and Italy, WT", DS479, R, 22 March 2018, 2018[DOI]
8. "Russia – Measures affecting the importation of railway equipment and parts thereof, WT", DS499, pp.2018, ~
9. "Russia – Measures concerning the Importation and Transit of Certain Ukrainian Products, WT", DS532, pp.2017, ~
10. "Russia – Measures concerning traffic in transit, WT", DS512, pp.2019, ~
11. "Russia – Tariff Treatment of Certain Agricultural and Manufacturing Products, WT", DS485, pp.2016, ~
12. "Russian Federation – Measures on the Importation of Live Pigs , Pork and Other Pig Products from the European Union, WT", DS475, R, 23 February 2017, 2017[DOI]
13. "Russian Federation – Recycling Fee on Motor Vehicles, WT", DS462, pp.2013, ~
14. "Saudi Arabia – Measures Relating to Trade in Goods and Services, and Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, WT", DS528, pp.2017, ~
15. "Ukraine – Anti-Dumping Measures on Ammonium Nitrate, WT", DS493, DS494, pp.5, 18 December 2018, WT, DS499[DOI]
16. "Ukraine –Measures relating to Trade in Goods and Services, WT", DS525, pp.2017, ~
17. "Relating to Trade in Goods and Services, and Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, WT", DS526, DS527, pp.1, 4 August 2017, WT, DS528[DOI]
18. "United States – Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products, WT", DS544, pp.2019, ~
19. "United States – Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products, WT", DS547, pp.2019, ~
20. "United States – Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products, WT", DS548, pp.2019, ~
21. "United States – Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products, WT", DS550, pp.2019, ~
22. "United States – Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products, WT", DS551, pp.2019, ~
23. "United States – Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products, WT", DS552, pp.2019, ~
24. "United States – Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products, WT", DS554, pp.2019, ~
25. "United States – Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products, WT", DS556, pp.2019, ~
26. "United States – Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products, WT", DS564, pp.2019, ~
27. Dapo Akande, "International Adjudication on National Security Issues: What Role for the WTO?", Virginia Journal of International Law, 43, pp.365~404 (2003)
28. Klinton W. Alexander, "The Helms-Burton Act and the WTO Challenge:Making a Case for the United States Under the GATT National Security Exception", Florida Journal of International Law, 11, pp.559~584 (1997)
29. Alan S. Alexandroff, "The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis", pp.1571~1579 (2005), Springer
30. Roger P. Alford, "The Self-Judging WTO Security Exception", Utah Law Review, 3, pp.697~759 (2011)
31. Raj Bhala, "National Security and International Trade Law: What the GATT Says, and What the United States Does", University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 19(2), pp.263~317 (1998)
32. Regis Bonnan, "The GATT Security Exception in a Dispute Resolution Context: Necessity or Incompatibility", Currents: International Trade Law Journal, 19, pp.3~12 (2010)
33. Rene E. Browne, "Revisiting National Security in an Interdependent World:The GATT Article XXI Defense after Helms-Burton", Georgetown Law Journal, 86, pp.405~432 (1997)
34. Wesley A. Cann, Jr., "Creating Standards and Accountability for the Use of the WTO Security Exception: Reducing the Role of Power-Based Relations and Establishing a New Balance Between Sovereignty and Multilateralism", Yale Journal of International Law, 26, pp.413~485 (2001)
35. Tsai-fang Chen, "“To Judge the “Self-Judging” Security Exception Under the GATT 1994 – A Systematic Approach", Asian Journal of WTO &International Health Law and Policy, 12, pp.311~356 (2017)
36. Riyaz Dattu, "GATT Article XXI, Helms-Burton and the Continuing Abuse of the National Security Exception", Canadian Business Law Journal, 28, pp.198~209 (1997)
37. William J. Davey, "Has the WTO Dispute Settlement System Exceeded Its Authority? A Consideration of Deference Shown by the System to Member Government Decisions and Its Use of Issue-Avoidance Techniques", Journal of International Economic Law, 4(1), pp.79~110 (2001)
38. Felicity Deane, "The WTO, the National Security Exception and Climate Change", Carbon & Climate Law Review, 2, pp.149~158 (2012)
39. Panagiotis Delimatsis, "Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, WTO –Trade in Services Vol. 6", pp.329~348 (2008)
40. Andrew Emmerson, "Conceptualizing Security Exceptions: Legal Doctrine or Political Excuse", Journal of International Economic Law, 11(1), pp.135~154 (2008)
41. Ryan Goodman, "Norms and National Security: The WTO as a Catalyst for Inquiry", Chicago Journal of International Law, 2(1), pp.101~119 (2001)
42. Michael J. Hahn, "Vital Interests and the Law of GATT: An Analysis of GATT’s Security Exception", Michigan Journal of International Law, 12, pp.558~620 (1991)
43. Masha Hedberg, "The Target Strikes Back: Explaining Countersanctions and Russia’s Strategy of Differentiated Retaliation", Post-Soviet Affairs, 34(1), pp.35~54 (2018)
44. Pamela A. Jordan, "Diminishing Returns: Russia’s Participation in the World Trade Organization", Post-Soviet Affairs, 33(6), pp.452~471 (2017)
45. Sophocles Kitharidis, "The Unknown Territories of the National Security Exception: The Importance and Interpretation of Art XXI of the GATT", Australian International Law Journal, 21, pp.79~100 (2014)
46. David D. Knoll, "Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962: Industrial Fasteners, Machine Tools and Beyond", Maryland Journal of International Law and Trade, 10, pp.55~88 (1986)
47. David D. Knoll, "The Impact of Security Concerns Upon International Economic Law", Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 11, pp.567~622 (1984)
48. Rishika Lekhadia, "Can the West Justify its Sanctions against Russia under the World Trade Law?", Indian Journal of International Trade Law, 7, pp.151~176 (2015)
49. Peter Lindsay, "The Ambiguity of GATT Article XXI: Subtle Success or Rampant Failure", Duke Law Journal, 52, pp.1277~1313 (2003)
50. Eric J. Lobsinger, "Diminishing Borders in Trade and Terrorism: An Examination of Regional Applicability of GATT Article XXI National Security Trade Sanctions", ILSA Journal of International &Comparative Law, 13(1), pp.99~138 (2006)
51. Stanley D. Metzger, "The Trade Expansion Act of 1962", Georgetown Law Journal, 51(3), pp.425~469 (1963)
52. Rostam J. Neuwirth, "The current EU", US–Russia conflict over Ukraine and the WTO: a preliminary note on (trade) restrictive measures, 2016, pp.32(3), 237~271
53. Rostam J Neuwirth, "The Economic Sanctions over the Ukraine Conflict and the WTO: 'Catch-XXI' and the Revival of the Debate on Security Exceptions", Journal of World Trade, 49(5), pp.891~914 (2015)
54. C. Todd Piczak, "The Helms-Burton Act: U.S. Foreign Policy Toward Cuba, The National Security Exception to the GATT and the Political Question Doctrine", University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 61, pp.287~238 (1999)
55. Shin-yi Peng, "Cybersecurity Threats and the WTO National Security Exceptions", Journal of International Economic Law, 18, pp.449~478 (2015)
56. Sandeep Ravikumar, "The GATT Security Exception: Systemic Safeguards Against Its Misuse", NUJS Law Review, 9, pp.321~340 (2016)
57. Susan Rose-Ackerman, "Treaties and National Security", International Law & Politics, 40, pp.437~496 (2008)
58. Hannes L. Schloemann, "‘Constitutionalization’ and Dispute Settlement in the WTO: National Security as an Issue of Competence", American Journal of International Law, 93, pp.424~451 (1999)
59. Thomas J. Schoenbaum, "International Trade and Protection of the Environment: The Continuing Search for Reconciliation", American Journal of International Law, 91(2), pp.268~313 (1997)
60. David T. Shapiro, "Be Careful What You Wish For: U.S. Politics and the Future of the National Security Exception to the GATT", George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, 31, pp.97~118 (1997)
61. Alexandr Svetlicinii, "The BRICS-Lawyers’ Guide to Global Cooperation", pp.54~77 (2017), Cambridge University Press
62. Viljar Veebel, "Lessons from the EU-Russia Sanctions 2014-201", Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 8(1), pp.165~194 (2015)
63. Richard Sutherland Whitt, "The Politics of Procedure: An Examination of GATT Dispute Settlement Panel and Article XXI Defence in the Context of the U.S. Embargo on Nicaragua", Law & Policy in International Business, 19, pp.603~631 (1987)
64. Ji Yeong Yoo, "Security Exceptions in the WTO System:Bridge of Bottle-Neck for Trade and Security", Journal of International Economic Law, 19, pp.417~444 (2016)
65. Donald N. Zillman, "Energy Trade and the National Security Exception to the GATT", Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law, 12(1), pp.117~127 (1994)
66. "Trump, China, and Steel Tariffs: The Day the WTO Died (Council on Foreign Relations, 9 March 2018)" (2018)[URL]
67. "US may tie NATO contributions to tariff exemptions" (2018)[URL]
68. "EU and Japan press US on steel and aluminium tariffs (Financial Times, 11 March 2018)" (2018)[URL]
69. "Justiciability of Security Exceptions in the US Steel (and other)Disputes: Some Middle-Ground Options and the Requirements of Article XXI lit. b (i)-(iii) (EJIL:Talk!, 20 November 2018)" (2018)[URL]
70. "Brazil plans to negotiate US steel tariffs (Agencia Brasil, 9March 2018)" (2018)[URL]
71. "U.S. steel and aluminium tariffs: how should the EU respond? (9March 2018)" (2018)[URL]
72. "Protean ‘National Security’ in Global Trade Wars, Investment Walls, and Regulatory Controls: Can ‘National Security’ Ever Be Unreviewable in International Economic Law?" (2018)[URL]
73. "EU adopts rebalancing measures in reaction to US steel and aluminium tariffs" (2018)[URL]
74. "European Commission outlines EU plan to counter US trade restrictions on steel and aluminium" (2018)[URL]
75. "Qatar under siege: Chances for an Article XXI case? (EJIL: Talk!, 9 January 2018)" (2018)[URL]
76. "Poland demands WTO challenge over Russia food ban EU Observer" (2014)[URL]
77. "Sanctioning Qatar: Coercive interference in the State’s domaine reserve? (EJIL: Talk!, 30 June 2017)" (2017)[URL]
78. "Trump, China, and a Tale of Aluminum and Steel Tariffs" (2018)[URL]
79. "Regional Trade Agreement Dispute Settlement Mechanisms:Modes, Challenges and Options for Effective Dispute Resolution" (2018)[URL]
80. "Update1 – Russia challenges U.S. at WTO over sanctions – PM Medvedev" (2014)[URL]
81. "Russia Still Prepares to Challenge EU, US Sanctions in WTO:Kremlin" (2014)[URL]
82. "Trump, Trade, and National Security – Blowing Up the WTO?" (2018)[URL]
83. "Saudi cites national security to block WTO case brought by Qatar" (2018)[URL]
84. "The Dispute Settlement Crisis in the World Trade Organization: Causes and Cures, Policy Brief 18-5" (2018)[URL]
85. "TASS – Russian News Agency, US sanctions against Russian banks challenge WTO foundations – minister (19 May 2014)" (2014)[URL]
86. "Germany breaks ranks with rush White House meeting on tariffs" (2018)[URL]
87. "Qatar given 10 days to meet 13 sweeping demands by Saudi Arabia" (2017)[URL]
88. "Azevêdo calls on members to avoid triggering an escalation in trade barriers" (2018)[URL]
89. "Qatar seeks WTO panel review of UAE measures on goods, services, IP rights" (2017)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천