아킬레스건 파열의 수술적 치료 비교: 최소 절개 봉합술과 관혈적 봉합술
A Comparative Study of Surgical Treatment in the Ruptured Achilles Tendon: Minimal incision and Open repair
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare and analyse the clinical outcomes of minimal incision repair and open repair in ruptured Achilles tendon. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 10 patients with minimal incision repair (group 1) and 19 patients with open repair (group 2) from February 2007 to June 2011. The postoperative clinical evaluations were done by Arner-Lindholm scale, AOFAS score, overall patient’s satisfaction and cosmetic satisfaction of scar. Results: There was no statistical difference between two groups in Arner-Lindholm scale, AOFAS score, overall patient’s satisfaction (p=1.21, 0.87, 1.07). There was statistically high rate of cosmetic satisfaction in group 1(p<0.001). There were no complications in group 1. Complications occurred in three patients (deep infection, rerupture, deep vein thrombosis) of group 2. Conclusion: Treatment of minimal incision repair in Achilles’s tendon ruptures showed high rate of cosmetic satisfaction and low rate of complication’s, but there were no significant differences with open repair in other clinical outcomes. The minimal incision repair could be recommended as one of the effective treatment for the Achilles’s tendon ruptures.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare and analyse the clinical outcomes of minimal incision repair and open repair in ruptured Achilles tendon. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 10 patients with minimal incision repair (group 1) and 19 patients with open repair (group 2) from February 2007 to June 2011. The postoperative clinical evaluations were done by Arner-Lindholm scale, AOFAS score, overall patient’s satisfaction and cosmetic satisfaction of scar. Results: There was no statistical difference between two groups in Arner-Lindholm scale, AOFAS score, overall patient’s satisfaction (p=1.21, 0.87, 1.07). There was statistically high rate of cosmetic satisfaction in group 1(p<0.001). There were no complications in group 1. Complications occurred in three patients (deep infection, rerupture, deep vein thrombosis) of group 2. Conclusion: Treatment of minimal incision repair in Achilles’s tendon ruptures showed high rate of cosmetic satisfaction and low rate of complication’s, but there were no significant differences with open repair in other clinical outcomes. The minimal incision repair could be recommended as one of the effective treatment for the Achilles’s tendon ruptures.
참고문헌 (26)
- Leppilahti J, "Incidence of Achilles tendon rupture", Acta Orthop Scand, 67, pp.277~279 (1996)
- Maffulli N., "Rupture of the Achilles tendon", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 8, pp.1019~1036 (1999)
- Bradley JP, "Percutaneous and open surgical repairs of Achilles tendon ruptures. A comparative study", Am J Sports Med, 18, pp.188~195 (1990)
- Inglis AE, "Ruptures of the Tendo Achilles. An objective assessment of surgical and non-surgical treatment", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 58, pp.990~993 (1976)
- Mukundan C, "“Mini-open” repair of acute tendo Achilles ruptures--the solution?", Foot Ankle Surg, 16, pp.122~125 (2010)
- Fortis AP, "Repair of achilles tendon rupture under endoscopic control", Arthroscopy, 24, pp.683~688 (2008)
- Tang KL, "Arthroscopically assisted percutaneous repair of fresh closed achilles tendon rupture by Kessler’s suture", Am J Sports Med, 35, pp.589~596 (2007)
- Nistor L., "Surgical and non-surgical treatment of Achilles Tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 63, pp.394~399 (1981)
- Ljungqvist R., "Subcutaneous partial rupture of the Achilles tendon", Acta Orthop Scand, 1(Suppl113) (1967)
- Cretnik A, "Percutaneous versus open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon : a comparative study", Am J Sports Med, 33, pp.1369~1379 (2005)
- Cretnik A, "The strength of percutaneous methods of repair of the Achilles tendon : a biomechanical study", Med Sci Sports Exerc, 32, pp.16~20 (2000)
- Rebeccato A, "Repair of the Achilles tendon rupture : a functional comparison of three surgical techniques", J Foot Ankle Surg, 40, pp.188~194 (2001)
- Rippstein P, "Surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture using a"mini-open"technique", Foot Ankle Clin N Am, 7, pp.611~619 (2002)
- Krackow KA, "A new stitch for ligament-tendon fixation. Brief note", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 68, pp.764~766 (1986)
- Kitaoka HB, "Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes", Foot Ankle Int, 15, pp.349~353 (1994)
- Arner O, "Subcutaneous rupture of the Achilles tendon; a study of 92 cases", Acta Chir Scand Suppl, 116(239), pp.1~51 (1959)
- Saxena A, "Wound complications from surgeries pertaining to the Achilles tendon : an analysis of 219 surgeries", J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 98, pp.95~101 (2008)
- Cetti R, "A prospective randomized study and review of the literature", Am J Sports Med, 21, pp.791~799 (1993)
- Ma GW, "Percutaneous repair of acute closed ruptured Achilles tendon : a new technique", Clin Orthop, 128, pp.247~255 (1977)
- Sutherland A, "A modified technique of percutaneous repair of ruptured Achilles tendon", Oper Orthop Traumat, 7, pp.288~295 (1999)
- Winter E, "Comparison of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment", Clin Orthop, 207, pp.156~163 (1986)
- Aracil J, "Percutaneous suture of Achilles tendon ruptures", Foot and Ankle, 13, pp.350~351 (1992)
- Kakiuchi M, "A combined open and percutaneous technique for repair of tendo Achilles. Comparison with open repair", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 77, pp.60~63 (1995)
- Assal M, "Limited open repair of Achilles tendon ruptures: a technique with a new instrument and findings of a prospective multicenter study", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 84, pp.161~170 (2002)
- Jung HG, "Surgical Repair of Achilles Tendon Rupture by Minimal Incision Technique", J Korean Foot Ankle Soc, 9, pp.173~178 (2005)
- Lee KB, "Limited Open Repair Technique of Achilles Tendon Ruptures - Operative Technique and Early Results -", J Korean Foot Ankle Soc, 10, pp.37~41 (2006)