아킬레스건 파열의 세 가지 수술적 치료법의 임상 결과에 대한 비교: 관혈적 봉합술, 경피적 봉합술, 아킬론을 이용한 최소절개 봉합술
Comparative Study of Clinical Outcome of Three Surgical Techniques in the Achilles Tendon Rupture: Open Repair, Percutaneous Repair, and Minimal Incision Repair by Achillon
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study compared the clinical outcomes of open repair, percutaneous repair, and minimal incision repair by Achillon in ruptured Achilles tendon. Materials and Methods: The outcomes of 12 patients with open repair (group 1), 8 patients with percutaneous repair (group 2), and 10 patients with minimal incision repair by Achillon (group 3) from February 2013 to March 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The postoperative clinical evaluations were done by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, ArnerLinholm scale, mid-calf circumference difference, one-leg heel raise difference, visual analogue scale (VAS) for postoperative scarring, time to return to work, and complications. Results: No significant difference in the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, Arner-Linholm scale, and time to return to work was observed among three groups (p=0.968, 0.509, and 0.585). The mean differences in the mid-calf circumference in groups 1, 2, and 3 were 1.09, 0.73, and 0.58, respectively; groups 2 and 3 were significantly higher than group 1 (p=0.002). In addition, the mean VAS scores for postoperative scarring in groups 1, 2, and 3 were 7.0, 9.1, and 9.1, respectively; groups 2 and 3 were significantly higher than group 1 (p=0.001). The mean differences in one-leg heel raising in groups 1, 2, and 3 were 2.03, 1.91, and 1.33, respectively; group 3 was significantly higher than groups 1 and 2 (p=0.010). The complications encountered were one case of deep infection in group 1 and one case of sural nerve hypoesthesia in group 2. Conclusion: Minimal incision repair by Achillon is recommended as an effective surgical treatment for Achilles tendon rupture because it minimizes the risk of complications, leads to an improved tendon strength and healing, and achieves cosmetic satisfaction.
Abstract
Purpose: This study compared the clinical outcomes of open repair, percutaneous repair, and minimal incision repair by Achillon in ruptured Achilles tendon. Materials and Methods: The outcomes of 12 patients with open repair (group 1), 8 patients with percutaneous repair (group 2), and 10 patients with minimal incision repair by Achillon (group 3) from February 2013 to March 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The postoperative clinical evaluations were done by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, ArnerLinholm scale, mid-calf circumference difference, one-leg heel raise difference, visual analogue scale (VAS) for postoperative scarring, time to return to work, and complications. Results: No significant difference in the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, Arner-Linholm scale, and time to return to work was observed among three groups (p=0.968, 0.509, and 0.585). The mean differences in the mid-calf circumference in groups 1, 2, and 3 were 1.09, 0.73, and 0.58, respectively; groups 2 and 3 were significantly higher than group 1 (p=0.002). In addition, the mean VAS scores for postoperative scarring in groups 1, 2, and 3 were 7.0, 9.1, and 9.1, respectively; groups 2 and 3 were significantly higher than group 1 (p=0.001). The mean differences in one-leg heel raising in groups 1, 2, and 3 were 2.03, 1.91, and 1.33, respectively; group 3 was significantly higher than groups 1 and 2 (p=0.010). The complications encountered were one case of deep infection in group 1 and one case of sural nerve hypoesthesia in group 2. Conclusion: Minimal incision repair by Achillon is recommended as an effective surgical treatment for Achilles tendon rupture because it minimizes the risk of complications, leads to an improved tendon strength and healing, and achieves cosmetic satisfaction.
참고문헌 (28)
- Raikin SM, "Achilles tendon injuries in a United States population", Foot Ankle Int, 34, pp.475~480 (2013)[DOI]
- Jung HG, "Surgical repair of Achilles tendon rupture by minimal incision technique", J Korean Foot Ankle Soc, 9, pp.173~178 (2005)
- Deangelis JP, "Achilles tendon rupture in athletes", J Surg Orthop Adv, 18, pp.115~121 (2009)
- Azar FM, "Campbell's operative orthopaedics, Vol 3", pp.2008, Mosby
- Cretnik A, "Percutaneous suturing of the ruptured Achilles tendon under local anesthesia", J Foot Ankle Surg, 43, pp.72~81 (2004)[DOI]
- 전택수, "경피적 기법에 의한 아킬레스건 파열의 수술적 봉합술", 대한정형외과학회지, 44(6), pp.661~667 (2009), 대한정형외과학회
- Cetti R, "Operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study and review of the literature", Am J Sports Med, 21, pp.791~799 (1993)[DOI]
- Maffulli N, "Rupture of the Achilles tendon", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 81, pp.1019~1036 (1999)[DOI]
- Mukundan C, ""Miniopen" repair of acute tendo Achilles ruptures--the solution?", Foot Ankle Surg, 16, pp.122~125 (2010)[DOI]
- Fortis AP, "Repair of Achilles tendon rupture under endoscopic control", Arthroscopy, 24, pp.683~688 (2008)[DOI]
- Tang KL, "Arthroscopically assisted percutaneous repair of fresh closed Achilles tendon rupture by Kessler's suture", Am J Sports Med, 35, pp.589~596 (2007)[DOI]
- Khan RJ, "Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. A metaanalysis of randomized, controlled trials", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87, pp.2202~2210 (2005)
- Ahmed IM, "Blood supply of the Achilles tendon", J Orthop Res, 16, pp.591~596 (1998)[DOI]
- Bradley JP, "Percutaneous and open surgical repairs of Achilles tendon ruptures. A comparative study", Am J Sports Med, 18, pp.188~195 (1990)[DOI]
- Lim J, "Percutaneous vs. open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon--a prospective randomized controlled study", Foot Ankle Int, 22, pp.559~568 (2001)[DOI]
- Ma GW, "Percutaneous repair of acute closed ruptured Achilles tendon: a new technique", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (128), pp.247~255 (1977)
- Sutherland A, "A modified technique of percutaneous repair of ruptured Achilles tendon", Orthop Traumatol, 7, pp.288~295 (1999)
- Assal M, "Limited open repair of Achilles tendon ruptures: a technique with a new instrument and findings of a prospective multicenter study", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 84, pp.161~170 (2002)[DOI]
- Rebeccato A, "Repair of the Achilles tendon rupture: a functional comparison of three surgical techniques", J Foot Ankle Surg, 40, pp.188~194 (2001)[DOI]
- Rippstein PF, "Surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture using a "mini-open" technique", Foot Ankle Clin, 7, pp.611~619 (2002)[DOI]
- Kitaoka HB, "Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes", Foot Ankle Int, 15, pp.349~353 (1994)[DOI]
- Arner O, "Subcutaneous rupture of the Achilles tendon; a study of 92 cases", Acta Chir Scand Suppl, 116(Suppl 239), pp.1~51 (1959)
- Soroceanu A, "Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis of randomized trials", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 94, pp.2136~2143 (2012)[DOI]
- Willits K, "Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a multicenter randomized trial using accelerated functional rehabilitation", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 92, pp.2767~2775 (2010)[DOI]
- Chiodo CP, "Diagnosis and treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 18, pp.503~510 (2010)[DOI]
- Saxena A, "Wound complications from surgeries pertaining to the Achilles tendon: an analysis of 219 surgeries", J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 98, pp.95~101 (2008)[DOI]
- Kosanovic M, "Subcutaneous suturing of the ruptured Achilles tendon under local anaesthesia", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 113, pp.177~179 (1994)[DOI]
- Huffard B, "Achilles tendon repair: Achillon system vs. Krackow suture: an anatomic in vitro biomechanical study", Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 23, pp.1158~1164 (2008)[DOI]